- Sep 24, 2005
- 10
- 10
the ads aint no problem with me
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Quote:
Oh and how the hell are you gonna say Meth got owned by ISS? What thread are you reading in?
meth didnt get owned, but did you not read the last 4 pages..
[/center]
Quote:
F'n sad day. Finally get my NT account and strolled in at the end
Is it not against Google's rules to ask members to click on ads so you can make money? ISS, Crooked Tongues, Sneakerfreaker never asked me to click on an ad. NEVER. Getting owned by $teve made your head cloudy or what?
well let's hope you never post again. if you don't like it, then leave. Hopefully this will help you out.
Quote:
2. Swearing is unacceptable. Attempting to circumvent this rule using abbreviations, acronyms, or other obvious representations of prohibited language will not be tolerated and will result in administrative action. Other restrictions may be made according to context. If you are unsure if a word is appropriate, DO NOT USE IT.
someone ban him.
Quote:
^^dont know if you know the answer ska, but do they base the google ads on keywords in the forum? or is it topics the administration chooses and google picks out the ads?
As I understand it, Google ads are generated using keywords found on each individual page where the ads appear.
For instance, there's currently a post on page 1 of the general forum about Apple Computers. If you were to click that post, you'd find that all four ads deal with Apple Computers. Click on the Sports forum, you might see ads for NBA Finals tickets, etc. If the search fails to produce any relevant ads, I believe it defaults to ads in our "category."
Of course, we've eliminated probably hundreds of ads from our category by now, so unfortunately many of those ads are now repetitive.
With your help, we have DRAMATICALLY reduced the number of fake ads - and we're still waiting to receive the "master list" from RockDeep that will help us even further. You may remember that someone tried to post a "complete" list of fake ads appearing on Google? Yeah right. If you were to compare that to our block list, you'd be looking at the difference between a book and a pamphlet.
Obviously, new sites pop up all the time so we'll need to be vigilant, but we've made incredible progress in just a few short days.
Quote:
why not let nike put a big ad on top of page, i bet u could get some serious money for that
Don't hold your breath. With precious few exceptions, Nike seems to take this community and its members entirely for granted. They may give lip service, but they don't walk the talk.
Quote:
what if people paid like $20 a year to get these fancy options (free picture hosting, @niketalk.com email, unlimited posting), and then we could keep NT ad free?
The free picture hosting will be offered to ALL Yuku members - so we won't be charging for that. Unlimited posting can negatively impact all of our members and viewers, so I wouldn't be interested in selling such an option.
Realistically, I don't think selling "premium" features to regulars would be enough to cover all of our costs. We need a reliable, repeatable source of income - and ads provide that. We have bills to pay EVERY month and while the demand for "plus" features may fluctuate, demand for advertising on NikeTalk is something we can count on. What we will try to do, though, is find a way to minimize intrusive advertising by exploring alternative fundraising options, like the possibility of plus features, limited apparel runs, etc. to supplement ad revenue. I'd much rather provide goods and services people LIKE to help us meet our fundraising goals, but as has been stated throughout this thread - advertising is a necessary evil when it comes to content based services such as ours. There are ads on blogs, ads on myspace, etc. etc. Unfortunately, it comes with the territory since you're going to entertain far, far more passive viewers (read: freeloaders) than active participants willing to pay for additional products and features. Since they generate so much of the cost, they must be accounted for in the solution.
Quote:
and if clicking on the ads helps, then should we wait for the ad style we like and then click on those ads? cause right now i don't like this style, and i don't want to click in the links if that makes you think i like the style.
You're free to do as you wish, but remember that our forum regulars comprise a small minority of our total viewership. Whereas many of our regulars would be happy to help support NikeTalk by clicking on our ads - even if you had to go to a separate "sponsors" page to do so - the clicks we need to WORK for are those from the non-posting viewers. The majority of our visits are recorded by members who do NOT have NikeTalk accounts. Of the 100,000 people who visited NikeTalk today, the overwhelming majority of them have NOT read this topic. They won't be motivated to click, as you might be, simply to support the community.
We need the support of our regulars, but it's not fair to ask you guys to shoulder the burden alone. So, we need to figure out how to best engage the rest of our audience. That's what these tests are all about.
Thanks to last week's tests, we now KNOW what the support of our regulars looks like. If this other format works better for drawing in the viewing only crowd, we'd see a spike in participation regardless of whether you click the ads or not. Non-posting viewers outnumber our regulars at least 2:1.
If you SAY you don't like the ads - we'll listen and weigh that against whatever additional participation results from various ad styles. If you stop clicking, all that's really going to accomplish is to reduce the amount we'll be able to donate to charity when the test is over.
Quote:
ISS, Crooked Tongues, Sneakerfreaker never asked me to click on an ad. NEVER.
Okay. Do you want a cookie from them? If you even bother to read the entire post, or at least the first post made, you would know why the ads are here and why other websites are able to go ad-free while NT tries to stay profit-free.
Non-profit as in not trying to exploit the shoe community for "the love of shoes."
Quote:
What about banned screen names? Will we be able to reregister them. Not me but other members who have reps on em?
Sorry, Earsill. If you want to register your banned names with Yuku go nuts - but they'll never be allowed back on NT.
Quote:
im guessing view limits have been lifted, cuz ive been on all day and havent seen it hahaha.. when i used to hit the limit on bored days that was the sign to get out of the house...
thanks meth- you just ruined my summer...
Hey, I do what I can. As mentioned in the first post: now that we can actually make a good run at paying our bills, we can give back more than ever to the community. Granting everyone unlimited page views is the first step in that direction. Ads finally allow us to afford offering unlimited views.
Quote:
Sorry, Earsill. If you want to register your banned names with Yuku go nuts - but they'll never be allowed back on NT.
Man Meth, thats when I stayed with my brother, dude went postal on my names. I'm in college now, well home for the summer. You can see the big difference in post. Have you ever seen me go ignorent on this name? No sir, I don't plan on it either.
[/b]