- May 4, 2005
- 12,911
- 843
cam.. you need to sell me some of your 95's
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by DIDDYDADAGGER
they are both legendary in their own right but the edge goes to the earliest innovation
No disrespect, but it seems like you enjoy making up your own words.Originally Posted by BinYe
97's have more rigidity and feel more snug on your feet.
Through durationous wear-and-tear, 97's last longer.
95's structural cage loosens after a dozen runs for me (i have wide feet and seldom lace up my jawns to nestling proportions, i do that to omitify creasage on toe-box).
Sheer aesthetics, 95's are like a fat kid... cuz it takes the cake.
But in gist, it boils down to build quality for me. The 97's > 95's
Originally Posted by Redrum SB
97's imo look too much like running shoes....
Me neitherOriginally Posted by JorPun662
never owned a pair of either