- 284
- 128
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2015
If I'm wrong correct me I don't follow.Is this the hill you want to die on b lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
If I'm wrong correct me I don't follow.Is this the hill you want to die on b lol
For the 3Rd time. What I'm saying is the lifestyle along with other contributing circumstances lead to the fall.Let me get this straight...so you're really saying that there's some sort of vast historical gay conspiracy to end civilization?
...n come to think of it I haven't heard anybody use that word in my day to day In a min it seems , probly months ...things really done changedWhen Kobe got fined for calling a ref the F-word, I knew things started to become serious
Totally forgot about this
I swear Aaron's the new Negrodamus man
The prediction really was uncanny
View media item 1814373
View media item 1814378
Thug is out there with it, but he's never gone close to that far . Someone PS'd his face onto that pic.
That's not him.
Ran outta reps.As a black man this is such a pathetic mentality. This some loser ****. Admitting that you took a L to homosexuals about rights? After centuries of slavery and fighting for freedom, civil rights, and equality that's just some bull **** I can never agree with.
The more I see black ppl pit our struggle against gay ppl the more I
"You've yet to explain what homosexuality has to do with the downfall of the roman empire".
Explained...
As I stated there were contributing circumstances that went along with the homosexual factor. That alone didn't bring the demise buthe it's a factor. Homosexuals don't have offspring which weakens the economy (look at china's 1 child policy). Again once moral boundaries get blurred it's a downward trend.
"Seeing as all great empires in history came to an end, I doubt the sexuality of the citizens had much to do with the inevitable".
Explained...
It's a domino effect every action has a reaction, the homosexual community have lobbies and divide and conquer ensue we destroy ourselves from within and the historical cycle continues. Now in and of itself the lifestyle is neither here nor there but the subsequent issues that follow are the issue.
Along with every other circumstance a society faces.
There is a lot of good input here but it's deeper than that. Throughout history when this behavior is rapant it's tends to mean the end of that society. The Romans indulged in it before their fall. We're all victims of history (society that is) and as you can tell with the economy and manufactured wars were heading for the same fate, only time will tell.... But this story has been told by history before.
Boom denzel.gifI actually think about this all the time. I cant even remember the last time i said it. Like at this point I actually feel bad whenever the word comes out of my mouth. I wonder if the N word will be like that some day.
all of these people in here arguing with you have not even click and read the article.I'll engage but tell me your stance on the points I've addressed before we move on. I don't want to spin our wheels discussing a moot point.
enlightenedespot.. My point is that it's a factor no matter the magnitude along with other factors the piggyback along with it. China's policy has hurt their economic growth everything is relative. I personally don't care what an individuals orientation is. It hurts when the agenda is being forced fed to impressionable youth.
It's nice that we have an openly gay member here. How do you feel about the recent threads about homosexuality and some NT members' responses? For example when someone says they don't agree with homosexuality. It's good that we have the perspective of a gay member now.also curious to hear about this agenda that is constantly brought up.... you mean the one in which we're trying to secure equal rights?
your line about impressionable youth seems to imply that exposure to gay people will turn them gay. i grew up in the '80s in a normal, stable home. 2.5 kids in the suburbs and all that. was never molested, my parents weren't abusive nor were they overly coddling. i didn't have a gay uncle. we didn't have family friends that were gay, nor did i see it on tv. literally the most normal childhood you can imagine with ZERO exposure to anything that might be considered gay. and yet despite all of that, i turned out gay. it was something i recognized early on but didn't understand. it wasn't a choice (who in the hell would choose that growing up in alabama?) and it certainly wasn't environmental. it's just who i am and nothing could have been done to change that.
also curious to hear about this agenda that is constantly brought up.... you mean the one in which we're trying to secure equal rights?
your line about impressionable youth seems to imply that exposure to gay people will turn them gay. i grew up in the '80s in a normal, stable home. 2.5 kids in the suburbs and all that. was never molested, my parents weren't abusive nor were they overly coddling. i didn't have a gay uncle. we didn't have family friends that were gay, nor did i see it on tv. literally the most normal childhood you can imagine with ZERO exposure to anything that might be considered gay. and yet despite all of that, i turned out gay. it was something i recognized early on but didn't understand. it wasn't a choice (who in the hell would choose that growing up in alabama?) and it certainly wasn't environmental. it's just who i am and nothing could have been done to change that.
As I stated there were other contributing circumstances that went along with it. Now onto your point there is a moral degradation that occurs once lines start to get blurred. Which leads to the downfall of societies, no there weren't homosexual wars but it's a cycle that's has been throughout history is my point.
Does him being a fool have anything to do with him being black or gay?Sp can I call Young Thug a damn fool without being labeled a bigot?
You should study your history more closer.There is a lot of good input here but it's deeper than that. Throughout history when this behavior is rapant it's tends to mean the end of that society. The Romans indulged in it before their fall. We're all victims of history (society that is) and as you can tell with the economy and manufactured wars were heading for the same fate, only time will tell.... But this story has been told by history before.
Okay then it's pretty simple which do you think was a more important factor in leading to that fall?Let me clarify that behavior ALONE did not lead to the fall; war,corruption,military occupation of foreign countries and invasion. These also lead to it all of which are present in our current situation.
BruhInteresting from the article you posted. Same sex marriage first began in this Roman society in 27bce and their fall was 476 that's 449 years roughly 5 generations. America has been established Roughly 250 years. At this rate were on the same tragectory.I dont think you can compare the roman era to now.
people are constantly evolving and times are much different now.
Interesting read
http://appliedsentience.com/2013/07...ng-homosexuality-lead-to-civilizational-ruin/
Moral boundaries being blurred didn't have a damn thing to do with the fall of the Roman empire."You've yet to explain what homosexuality has to do with the downfall of the roman empire".
Explained...
As I stated there were contributing circumstances that went along with the homosexual factor. That alone didn't bring the demise buthe it's a factor. Homosexuals don't have offspring which weakens the economy (look at china's 1 child policy). Again once moral boundaries get blurred it's a downward trend.
"Seeing as all great empires in history came to an end, I doubt the sexuality of the citizens had much to do with the inevitable".
Explained...
It's a domino effect every action has a reaction, the homosexual community have lobbies and divide and conquer ensue we destroy ourselves from within and the historical cycle continues. Now in and of itself the lifestyle is neither here nor there but the subsequent issues that follow are the issue.
Along with every other circumstance a society faces.
You mean the article he didn't post? The one sckid did?all of these people in here arguing with you have not even click and read the article.I'll engage but tell me your stance on the points I've addressed before we move on. I don't want to spin our wheels discussing a moot point.
At no time did I say it was immoral. I was off topic with my initial post. I have no facts on weather people are born like it not my debate, but I know of someone first hand who was impressionable and decided to live the lifestyle.Can you tell us what you believe is immoral about homosexuality?