- 6,260
- 7,216
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2014
I know this is the MCU thread, but i'm still confused as to why some of yall refuse to blame the real culprit in this mess: Disney. They've gotten too big for their own good.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I know this is the MCU thread, but i'm still confused as to why some of yall refuse to blame the real culprit in this mess: Disney. They've gotten too big for their own good.
Too big for their own good? What studio has a W rate of 100% since inception?I know this is the MCU thread, but i'm still confused as to why some of yall refuse to blame the real culprit in this mess: Disney. They've gotten too big for their own good.
I don't disagree with you on them making successful MCU movies with spiderman in them. But I gotta side with Sony on this dispute. Disney is asking for wayyyy to much. I can't lie, part of me wants the MCU to have to change course because of this.And yet.. they’re 2/2 in Spider-Man movies.. 5/5 if we’re including CW, IW and EG
Meanwhile Sony has butchered couple Spider-Man movies.. and other studios have done the same with other beloved properties from my childhood
Me and Disney Gucci when it comes to marvel properties.. other things, sure we could have a cup of coffee about, but marvel we good
Too big for their own good? What studio has a W rate of 100% since inception?
They literally havent had a badly performing movie since Marvel Studios became a thing...........This is business. There`s no such thing as TOO big, in business.
SONY got a big head and now they believe they can do it without Marvel/Disney. Thats the issue, not M/D.
I don't disagree with you on them making successful MCU movies with spiderman in them. But I gotta side with Sony on this dispute. Disney is asking for wayyyy to much. I can't lie, part of me wants the MCU to have to change course because of this.
You keep saying DISNEY................While Disney owns Marvel, its MARVEL that makes and produces the movies.So, we gonna conveniently omit how the mouse has butchered the star wars franchise? No studio has a perfect track record, including Disney.
I have zero clue what Disney is actually asking for, thou
I can't lie, part of me wants the MCU to have to change course because of this.
Wasn't spiderman going to be the face of the MCU now that IM is no more?Did you see the lineup for Phase 4? Marvel Studios ain't worried about not having Spider-Man.
they want 50/50 while they already have 100% of the spidey merch $$$
still sucks though but who do you guys think is gon be the center of mcu now? back to doc strange again? thor if hemsworth stays for another 10 years?
CM? Blade?
But has that been confirmed or is Sony just pushing that to the media?
its from the very first report before sony even responded
from deadlines updated article after sony has said their piece so its not really sony pushing anything out there, what they are saying is that feige is gon' be too busy: https://deadline.com/2019/08/kevin-...nter-soldier-tom-rothman-bob-iger-1202672545/
Sony Pictures spent much of yesterday trying to spin Deadline about the prospective loss of Kevin Feige from future Spider-Man films. First the studio downplayed the idea he might be leaving; then insiders pinned his exit on added responsibilities from the Fox acquisition of the X-Men franchise, though they declined to make a statement. All this was reflected as factors in Deadline’s break of an important and widely regurgitated story. But sources maintain that Feige’s exit was about money; it was about Disney seeking the 50/50 co-fi stake as the price for Marvel and Feige’s continued guiding hand that resulted in the delivery of Sony’s biggest grossing film ever. Sony declined to meet those terms. It was an aggressive stance by Disney, which already owns the merchandise on Spider-Man, and a tough nut for Sony to swallow, giving up half of its most valuable franchise. But these talks had been going on for some time. Had Sony agreed to Disney’s ask, Marvel and Feige would not have withdrawn from the Spider-Man films, sources said.
Sony issued a statement late in the evening, not denying anything Deadline revealed yesterday, but reiterating its stance that Feige was too busy, which seems like spin. Deadline stands squarely behind its reporting.
50/50 on that tooYea 50/50 split is a tough pill to swallow especially when they’re not getting the toy and I don’t think merchandise revenue.. but what’s the deal with production costs and promotional costs?
Because I could see an argument THEN if all that is on Disney and essentially Sony is getting 500 mill per to lease out the character(s) and then I assume they get the full dvd, blue ray and after theater release revenue
Too big for their own good? What studio has a W rate of 100% since inception?
They literally havent had a badly performing movie since Marvel Studios became a thing...........This is business. There`s no such thing as TOO big, in business.
SONY got a big head and now they believe they can do it without Marvel/Disney. Thats the issue, not M/D.
50/50 on that too
Disney is willing to do 50/50 on production as well. After release profits I’m not 100% sureOn which part?
Production and promotions? Or after theatrical release profits?
This man get it!if disney is putting up 50% of the money to finance the film, i assume theyre gon' want 50% of all the profits as well
i love disney but they are pretty damn greedy themselves if not the greediest of all
From a business perspective, why would Sony concede that much in profits?Just sit back and watch this play out. Sony didn’t get out of a whole just to go back into it. They’ll give Disney what they want