- 150,448
- 201,131
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
was watching im2 the other day, high key trash. did not age well.
I know Lana Condor played Jubilee for the fox men
I think Marvel studios should cast her as Jubilee again. I think she's killing it in Deadly Class, this new syfy show.
Lana has a nice chest. Your thoughts Amel?
The pilot only has been shown. Although her role in the series is a key one, IMOShe’s getting more recognition for her movie on Netflix.I know Lana Condor played Jubilee for the fox men
I think Marvel studios should cast her as Jubilee again. I think she's killing it in Deadly Class, this new syfy show.
So you claim this, yet you forgot the plot of IM2?It would be an unusual move for marvel to tie a third act of a solo movie so heavily to the plot of an avengers movie
Historically marvel has not done that
Ironman 2 was definitely the worst out of the 3 ironmanswas watching im2 the other day, high key trash. did not age well.
Bits and pieces of IM2 are coming back to me yea. I stand by what I said. Name dropping Avengers initiative and introducing shield is not = tying to a plot of an Avengers movie to me
lamekilla's spoilers are linking Captain Marvel's third act to events that occurred in infinity war specifically
Lol what are you arguing exactly? That I'm saying certain mcu elements shouldn't be introduced in solo movies? I never said that. Don't put words in my mouth.Nick Fury and Coulson are in this movie as their younger selves. You don’t think that the idea of the Avengers initiative will be mentioned at all? Or the introduction of Shield in some capacity? That was shown to exist when Hank Pym was still a younger man and Howard Stark was still living?? Really???
Lol what are you arguing exactly? That I'm saying certain mcu elements shouldn't be introduced in solo movies? I never said that. Don't put words in my mouth.
*edit
Why would they mention the Avengers initiative in 1995?
Introducing an element that will be expanded upon in future movies is different. Every mcu movie is doing that. It's a part of building a shared universe.A question isn’t an argument. I’m asking as to why you think that a film that has key member that were integral in forming the Avengers as well as a hero who’s existence was hinted at in an Avengers film won’t or shouldn’t tie into a plot of an Avengers film. Granted the spoiler I posted should be taken with a grain of salt. Take that out the equation and ask yourself how many people watched Antman and Wasp and will understand how the Quantum realm manipulates time? A plot point that will be integral to an Avengers film yet introduced in a solo MCU film...
LOL IM3 is THE worst MCU movieIronman 2 was definitely the worst out of the 3 ironmans
Wasn’t ant man near quantum energy? And he wasn’t snapped awayOn one hand, its pretty ballsy a move. Nothing like that has really been done with a heroes origins a d juat entire concept and premise. It has a ton of potential.
On the other hand, some of that is complete over the top ridiculous fanwank nonsense Oh being near quantum energy keeps you from being snapped away somehow? The literal all powerful infinity gauntlet just has exceptions not named the Living Tribunal (or One above All)?
Plus the source
Not everyone was snapped away though.Wasn’t ant man near quantum energy? And he wasn’t snapped away
So Loki was under the influence of the Mind stone the whole time too? Was this common knowledge?
https://bgr.com/2018/12/31/avengers-endgame-spoilers-marvel-just-made-a-huge-change-to-canon/amp/