- Aug 6, 2012
- 57,881
- 61,629
I had to do it.the bat signal has been activated.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I had to do it.the bat signal has been activated.
lulz wut. thor has done well. ragnarok will boost it to another level.
the bat signal has been activated.
ionno.. I think it's probably more of a Disney decision.It would but I do understand why they aren't doing it. Don't wanna give up them May dates
I feel like after AoU Avengers will be at a point where no matter when it releases it will destroy anything that gets near it. Had they moved those two movies as well Tomorrows movie headlines would be how everyone has moved THEIR release date because they dont wanna be within earshot of an Avengers movie.
Honestly at this point, I'd say the Iron Man & Thor franchises are tied for being the weakest. Just gotta wait till Ragnarok comes out to see.Im not saying it did bad. Just saying it is doing the weakest of the other currently running franchises, and its the only property, besides the new ones, that they might wanna keep away from JL.
Also you wouldnt want the movie that needs to prove itself to have competition. Cap 3 could easily take JL because Cap 2 has already proven the franchise. Im saying this and I liked Thor 2. Just thought it couldve been better if Malekith was an advanced magic user.
I see we already got some negative nancies regarding this spectacularly, amazing news. It makes sense to push the films back. They were already a long wait, waiting a little longer isn't going to hurt. You don't get Spiderman back only to shelve him. Also, I don't see the plot of any of these movies being affected by his inclusion. He'll just be....included.
bring back jk simmons
Post credit scene in AOU where Tony is already recruiting Peter Parker would be
Honestly at this point, I'd say the Iron Man & Thor franchises are tied for being the weakest. Just gotta wait till Ragnarok comes out to see.
Ion eem care. You could have Baltroc be the villain, I'm there midnight.let's start speculating about Spider-Man villians
let's start speculating about Spider-Man villians
need the MCU to have The Spot as the villianlet's start speculating about Spider-Man villians
Ion eem care. You could have Baltroc be the villain, I'm there midnight.
probably the most realistic chance because he needs zero set-uplet's start speculating about Spider-Man villians
Kraven the Hunter. I wouldnt normally use him as a villain to introduce a franchise but spidey has had 5 movies in the last 13 years.
lulz wut. thor has done well. ragnarok will boost it to another level.
the bat signal has been activated.
Im not saying it did bad. Just saying it is doing the weakest of the other currently running franchises, and its the only property, besides the new ones, that they might wanna keep away from JL.
Also you wouldnt want the movie that needs to prove itself to have competition. Cap 3 could easily take JL because Cap 2 has already proven the franchise. Im saying this and I liked Thor 2. Just thought it couldve been better if Malekith was an advanced magic user.
You could've said Venom. But Venom & Carnage?Venon and carnage and no one else