- Aug 17, 2007
- 11,411
- 5,368
Isnt hulk not fully owned by MU tho?
Yeah I thought this is what stopping future hulk movies is the legal **** or something
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Isnt hulk not fully owned by MU tho?
Not likely. He's almost 50 and its still just ensemble roles in Avengers movies.you think maybe norton takes over again one of these days? would be cool to see
I. Dont know why people are hating on 08 hulk at all....is it because 8 years has passed and other movies have come out with better cgi??
Hulk had a good story, fun fights. What more did you want from the movie
Yep, as a film it was great. Only part where they screwed up is by not further connecting it to the MCU afterwards. Thunderbolt Ross appearing in Civil War is like one of the few times it's ever been referenced. I remember a few people in here weren't even aware that it was part of the MCU at all.
I liked Norton more, but i'm a fan of Ruffalo as well and don't mind him sticking around.
Universal has the distribution rights.
See what Thor was up to during #CaptainAmericaCivilWar! Get this & other bonus on Dig HD 9/2 pic.twitter.com/M97y6CM1Mg
— Marvel Studios (@MarvelStudios) August 28, 2016
Marvel put the Thor CW clip they showed at SDCC on Twitter. It's going to be on the CW blu-ray. It's pretty funny.
See what Thor was up to during #CaptainAmericaCivilWar! Get this & other bonus on Dig HD 9/2 pic.twitter.com/M97y6CM1Mg
— Marvel Studios (@MarvelStudios) August 28, 2016
Anyways, here's what was shown at Comic Con:
who did the kids say the guy in purple was?
couldn't hear that part