- Aug 5, 2012
- 27,886
- 27,697
How we feeling about our moves y'all
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How we feeling about our moves y'all
Yeah I wish we'd just fully commit to the rebuild and get out of this purgatory we've been plagued with for TOO longTrash, IMO. Need to trade Harrell or Kuzma (or both) for a decent PG and 6th man. I’d keep KCP for shooting + defense, but the current roster still has nobody who can create their own shot, or create a shot for other ppl, outside of Brad.
We really traded a first ballot Hall of Famer for the Lakers' garbage.How we feeling about our moves y'all
I appreciate the attempt to pierce the pessimism that surrounds this team, but it's not strictly accurate to refer to these three as "expiring deals."John Wall was considered the worst contract in basketball. They turned it into Westbrook and then they turned that into expiring deals.
We really traded a first ballot Hall of Famer for the Lakers' garbage.
This was, fundamentally, the same offer they made for Buddy Hield.
If you're celebrating this move, it could only be because the franchise has successfully lowered your standards.
The fit with Russ wasn't ideal, but if the goal was to compete for a title during Beal's prime then we should've been looking for a third star, like Kawhi Leonard. (The last time we tried to take a swing like that, KD wouldn't even schedule a meeting - and none of us could blame him.)
If the goal is a rebuild, then we should've brought back picks. Instead, in typical Wizards fashion, Sheppard tried to split the difference.
If he sought to give Beal a "supporting cast," the group popularly scapegoated for failing to support LeBron and AD is unlikely to achieve that goal. In an era where most contenders have three stars, we're down to one and we don't currently have the cap space to sign a star this summer, even if one were interested. Beal hasn't yet requested a trade, but it's only a matter of time. The Bertans deal killed us, and the only way out is a Josh Smith style buyout to which Ted would never, ever assent.
On the Webber scale of franchise setbacks, I would liken this to the Caron Butler for Josh Howard deal.
The "rebuild" won't begin in earnest until Beal gets flipped for magic beans prior to the trade deadline, but the Westbrook trade marks the moment when we flipped the switch from "disappointing" back to "awful." There is no third setting.
It's hard to escape the feeling that this is going to be one of those drafts we'll forever regard with a mixture of regret and disgust.
I appreciate the attempt to pierce the pessimism that surrounds this team, but it's not strictly accurate to refer to these three as "expiring deals."
KCP's Klutch sports special pays him $14 million in 2022/23. Kuzma's on the books for $13 million per until his player option the following year, which, given the trajectory of the franchise, he will exercise. Harrell's got one more year at $9.7 million. We didn't make Russ' contract disappear; we just broke it into smaller pieces - like the Kings did when they traded Chris Webber to Philly.
You could argue that this is still progress, because winning with Russ was always a pipe dream and the possibility exists that Wes could help rehab one or more of the Lakers' dregs so that they could be flipped into picks or prospects and free up more cap space, but the writing is on the wall for Beal now, and that's hard to feel good about.
What kind of package did you think Russell Westbrook was going to net in 2021? You make it same it like getting the same package that was being offered for Buddy Hield is a bad thing...when that should tell you that's exactly what Russell Westbrook is worth. Hell...go in the Lakers thread right now...more than half of their fanbase would have RATHERED the Buddy Hield trade. Him being a first ballot hall of famer means exactly what in terms of his value right now? Keep in mind he got here because we swapped headaches on bad deals for one another. Who's lining up to give some type of fruitful package for Westbrook?
Disappointing...back to awful? I'll reserve judgment until I see who's bought in through FA to play PG...but if they get a starter level talent...I can assure you that this team will be play-in contention just like they were with the "first ballot hall of famer". I found it pathetic how so many Wizards fans really pretended like whatever he did here in a couple of months after being awful...was something that they hadn't seen in the previous regime. We went into the bubble in 9th place...and with two all stars a year later we finished in 8th. Setback where?
Make no mistake...the best course of action would be to completely bottom out and move Beal too...but you're not going to sit up here and convince me that moving Russell Westbrook is a franchise setback. Can't wait to see if ya'll rally around this team when they're charging towards the 8th seed like ya'll did with last year's team.
22.9 PPG on 20.2 FGA (42.8% shooting), 5.6 3PA at 29%, 65.6 FT% on 6.2 attempts, 11.1 RPG, 10.7 APG, 4.5 TO, 3.4 PF, lose 4-1 in the first round = Chris Paul + two first round picks and two pick swaps.Methodical Management what the Wiz got back is bout he the best you can do for Russ in 2021…The goal when they acquired yo was to move him again soon as possible and they accomplished that …Got one less big contract and more flexibility going forward
All the “supporting cast” and “depth talk” is just pr bit to admit to casual fans that they on the tank route
22.9 PPG on 20.2 FGA (42.8% shooting), 5.6 3PA at 29%, 65.6 FT% on 6.2 attempts, 11.1 RPG, 10.7 APG, 4.5 TO, 3.4 PF, lose 4-1 in the first round = Chris Paul + two first round picks and two pick swaps.
22.2 PPG on 19 FGA (43.9% shooting), 4.2 3PA at 31.5%, 65.6 FT% on 6.4 attempts, 11.5 RPG, 11.7 APG, 4.8 TO, 2.9 PF, lose 4-1 in the first round = KCP, Kuzma, Harrell, and the #22 overall pick.
I'm not expecting the same return the Thunder got, but people acting like Russ didn't bounce back last season weren't watching. He's not a different player than he was in OKC and he has fewer years left on that monster contract. He led the league in assists. I'm tired of people acting like we should've been grateful for the Lakers' dregs based not on performance, but off court hot takes from some bitter old talking head like Skip Bayless who never played the game at a competitive level and think Russ is a cancer (gee, I wonder why....)
New Orleans landed three #1's for Jrue Holiday, and we're taking this pawn shop deal from the Lakers? Admittedly, we came out ahead on the Wall deal, but just because we bought low doesn't mean we should've sold low. Tune out the noise and look at production.
People said Chris Paul was washed when he was traded to OKC, too, and that his contract was untradeable. It's hard to argue that Russ didn't have a good season last year, especially given that he started out playing through a quad injury.
The Wizards had two paths here: blow it up and rebuild or try to add a star and contend. Now, they may not be done dealing, given the rumors around Kuzma and Harrell, but at this point it looks like they tried to split the difference because the only goal Ted ever has is to make the playoffs.
Saying "we'll probably end up in the same place this year as last year" is not a positive statement. The worst thing you can be in the NBA is mediocre.
We lost this trade on talent, sending a generational star for three guys who barely played when it mattered for LA. We did gain some flexibility, but not that much. Two of the three players we brought back have multiple years left, which wouldn't leave us with a max cap slot even next summer.
That essentially rules out building around Beal, and yet we didn't bring back what we need to start yet another "rebuild" - unless you think Kuzma, Hachimura, Kispert, and Deni Avdija are the nucleus of a future contender.
We'll have to see what happens from here, but as of now this move did little to raise the hopes of long-suffering Wizards fans. It just starts the countdown on a Beal trade.
I find little solace in the knowledge that Lakers fans are complaining. When is that not the case? They got LeBron James for nothing, won a title*, and they're out defacing his murals.
Last I checked, the Rockets used to be an NBA team and paid a hefty price for Westbrook just two years ago. He had an off year with Houston. Okay. Everyone thought Chris Paul was done after his stint with the Rockets and scared off by his big contract, too. OKC managed to get more out of their flip for an older Chris Paul than we did for Russell Westbrook - after pocketing four future draft picks.You can show me all of Russell Westbrook's counting stats that you believe makes him more valuable than apparently NBA GMs do
I find it amusing that your means of disputing the claim that Westbrook's value shouldn't be determined by cranky old White guys in the media was to post a screen cap of a John Hollinger article. You got me! Stats can't compete with evidence like that.Are you seriously telling me the correct course of action was to add a "third star" to a core of Westbrook and Beal?
I'm done here.
We really traded a first ballot Hall of Famer for the Lakers' garbage.
This was, fundamentally, the same offer they made for Buddy Hield.
If you're celebrating this move, it could only be because the franchise has successfully lowered your standards.
The fit with Russ wasn't ideal, but if the goal was to compete for a title during Beal's prime then we should've been looking for a third star, like Kawhi Leonard. (The last time we tried to take a swing like that, KD wouldn't even schedule a meeting - and none of us could blame him.)
If the goal is a rebuild, then we should've brought back picks. Instead, in typical Wizards fashion, Sheppard tried to split the difference.
If he sought to give Beal a "supporting cast," the group popularly scapegoated for failing to support LeBron and AD is unlikely to achieve that goal. In an era where most contenders have three stars, we're down to one and we don't currently have the cap space to sign a star this summer, even if one were interested. Beal hasn't yet requested a trade, but it's only a matter of time. The Bertans deal killed us, and the only way out is a Josh Smith style buyout to which Ted would never, ever assent.
On the Webber scale of franchise setbacks, I would liken this to the Caron Butler for Josh Howard deal.
The "rebuild" won't begin in earnest until Beal gets flipped for magic beans prior to the trade deadline, but the Westbrook trade marks the moment when we flipped the switch from "disappointing" back to "awful." There is no third setting.
It's hard to escape the feeling that this is going to be one of those drafts we'll forever regard with a mixture of regret and disgust.
I appreciate the attempt to pierce the pessimism that surrounds this team, but it's not strictly accurate to refer to these three as "expiring deals."
KCP's Klutch sports special pays him $14 million in 2022/23. Kuzma's on the books for $13 million per until his player option the following year, which, given the trajectory of the franchise, he will exercise. Harrell's got one more year at $9.7 million. We didn't make Russ' contract disappear; we just broke it into smaller pieces - like the Kings did when they traded Chris Webber to Philly.
You could argue that this is still progress, because winning with Russ was always a pipe dream and the possibility exists that Wes could help rehab one or more of the Lakers' dregs so that they could be flipped into picks or prospects and free up more cap space, but the writing is on the wall for Beal now, and that's hard to feel good about.
Anyone else hate that we’re going to likely give 28 year old, post-ACL tear Dinwiddie a 4 year deal? (Probably around $60+) Like haven’t the Wizards had enough the the injured point guard in his late 20s issues to not go this route? I get it was a rough FA class but damn.
Last I read it was 3/60, which is about his market value. Assuming he returns to form, that's not bad. He probably would have gotten a bigger deal had he not gotten injured (although BKLYN probably would have traded him before the deadline last season). Hope he refines a game a bit and cut down on the pull up 3's. He was actually an elite catch and shoot guy in Brooklyn. It's the pull up 3's that dragged his efficiency down. He's elite at the getting to the FT line and he's a willing passer.
I'm fine with the backcourt. The front court is ridiculously log jammed. Dinwiddie can only come on a sign-and-trade...so I'm guessing one of the LA guys is getting re-routed and/or Deni may be sacrificed. Hopefully they can re-route Bertans' to OKC. Brooklyn actually could use him but no way they're taking the tax hit on a guy like him.
Dear god, I hope we don’t move Deni out for Dinwiddie. Dinwiddie is in his late 20s coming off an ACL injury while essentially missing almost an entire season. Meanwhile, Brooks completely misused Deni as a spot up shooter, which is not his natural skillset so we really haven’t seen all that much of his potential yet. IMO, what this team needs is defense-Lonzo would’ve been ideal but he wasn’t coming here. Brogdon would’ve been even better but 0 chance the Pacers trade him without us including a haul (Rui, future picks, etc.).
If the logjam doesn't clear, Deni is going to be planted to the bench next season. Especially if Kispert's shot translates.
Honestly, Deni could actually be a solid facilitator for the second unit tbh.
Yeah...but where? Only going to speak on the roster as it stands right now...but one of KCP/Kuzma will start at the 3, pushing the other into the second unit. Unless the team wants the embarrassment of 85 million being out of the rotation...that leaves Bertans to fill out the back up 4 role. Then there's Kispert and Deni remaining...and unless Kispert can't shoot in the NBA...Deni might lose that battle.
Honestly, the best case for Deni to get minutes next season is to push Aaron Holiday for backup minutes in a point forward role.
The trade does make more sense in that context, but bear in mind that there was also a story indicating that it wasn't a firm demand. He wasn't going to eat his way out of town like James Harden. He would've honored his contract had the trade not occurred to his preferred destination.I think you’re overlooking the fact that Russ clearly wanted out. The signs of this started when his wife started following AD and LeBron a few weeks ago.
Yeah, that'll help our future free agent recruiting.Lol Terrible Teddy putting his foot in his mouth again
Leonsis compares NBA, NHL player loyalty after Ovechkin re-signing
I wouldn’t look at Ovechkin’s and Russell Westbrook’s situations as similar.www.bulletsforever.com
The trade does make more sense in that context, but bear in mind that there was also a story indicating that it wasn't a firm demand. He wasn't going to eat his way out of town like James Harden. He would've honored his contract had the trade not occurred to his preferred destination.
My issue is that they gave the Lakers the opportunity to bid against no competition. There are GMs in the hot seat right now. You've got teams like the Clippers, the Pelicans, and others with GMs on the hot seat who need to win now in order to keep their jobs. It's obviously all speculation, but I've heard nothing to indicate that they even talked to any other teams. If that's the case, it was more about doing right by Russ than getting the best possible return for Washington.
Despite my frustration, I was willing to give them the benefit of the doubt and see what they could get back if they could rehabilitate Kuzma and increase his future trade value, but now it's looking like they'll have to give up even more assets, possibly including Kuzma, who could get rerouted to a team like Minnesota to make the Dinwiddie sign and trade work with Brooklyn.
We'll see what happens, but I'm not feeling especially optimistic.
Yeah, that'll help our future free agent recruiting.
What a disgrace. DC deserves so much better.