- 9,086
- 11
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2006
I wouldn't do it if I were the Bucks. I see the upside but that's too big of a risk. The owner of the Bucks is willing to spend money as evident by their moves this off-season but that might be too much for him. I think the Bucks will do what the Rockets did with McGrady, keep Redd until the deadline and hope to dump him for pieces on a team desperate for cap relief.Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
So what do you think of moving Gil for Redd? I think it would give the Bucks a lot of flexibility in their backcourt....you can start gil at the 2, and when Jennings needs a spell...slide him over to the 1. When Gil is at the 1, you can plug in Salmons/CDR to get minutes there....Honestly, I think it would make sense for both teams....although, I could see the Bucks wanting to include another player in the deal since Redd's contract is coming off the books.Originally Posted by I NaSmatic I
Maggette is definitely a SF...Salmons can play SF but should be the starting SG. I think CDR will get his minutes at SG because the team has enough capable SFs at the moment.Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
Can any of those guys play the 3? If so, Gil in Milwaukee might not be a bad look. I think Redd is in no-mans land right now....but I can see the Bucks holding on to him because he's got an expiring deal.Originally Posted by Im Not You
Would make sense if Milwaukee didn't re-sign Salmons and pick up CDR and Maggette.