- 15,049
- 1,854
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2007
As much as I hate to admit it, this man can hoop
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by Mateen Cleaves
i like how we have all this talk about him not just in this thread but other as well, after he drops 55.
Originally Posted by bonafide hustla
Baron Davis
Steve Nash
Chauncey Billups
Jason Kidd
Deron Williams
Chris Paul
TJ Ford
Jose Calderon
Andre Miller
Brandon Roy (if u consider him a PG)
Jamaal Tinsley
Gilbert Arenas
Derrick Rose...yea i said it
i have more id even rather be my PG than these but ima keep it conservative
...all better PGs than Tony Parker. He's one of the better scoring PGs in the league by far, but as far as his skills being transferable at the PG position which is the only position he can play..nahhhhh he wouldn't look nearly this good around diff teams in the league. He doesn't really see the floor well and he's not a good defender despite whatever columnist came up with that rediculous stat saying he was 1st team all NBA defense based on points scored when he was on the floorHe can set other people up, but literally ONLY off his driving which isnt a negative, but he wouldn't be able to do that as much in a diff system. Tim Duncan made like 50% of this man's career. Dude can score at will on the Spurs though, but there's much more to the game than just scoring
I would take Tony P. over all these guys except Chris Paul. And I do believe he will make it to the Hall.Originally Posted by bonafide hustla
Baron Davis
Steve Nash
Chauncey Billups
Jason Kidd
Deron Williams
Chris Paul
TJ Ford
Jose Calderon
Andre Miller
Brandon Roy (if u consider him a PG)
Jamaal Tinsley
Gilbert Arenas
Derrick Rose...yea i said it
i have more id even rather be my PG than these but ima keep it conservative
...all better PGs than Tony Parker.
Originally Posted by bonafide hustla
Baron Davis
Steve Nash
Chauncey Billups
Jason Kidd
Deron Williams
Chris Paul
TJ Ford
Jose Calderon
Andre Miller
Brandon Roy (if u consider him a PG)
Jamaal Tinsley
Gilbert Arenas
Derrick Rose...yea i said it
i have more id even rather be my PG than these but ima keep it conservative
...all better PGs than Tony Parker. He's one of the better scoring PGs in the league by far, but as far as his skills being transferable at the PG position which is the only position he can play..nahhhhh he wouldn't look nearly this good around diff teams in the league. He doesn't really see the floor well and he's not a good defender despite whatever columnist came up with that rediculous stat saying he was 1st team all NBA defense based on points scored when he was on the floorHe can set other people up, but literally ONLY off his driving which isnt a negative, but he wouldn't be able to do that as much in a diff system. Tim Duncan made like 50% of this man's career. Dude can score at will on the Spurs though, but there's much more to the game than just scoring
Originally Posted by Div1LBC
Dude already has the rings, if he continues to put up numbers, I don't see why not.
Originally Posted by bonafide hustla
Baron Davis
Steve Nash
Chauncey Billups
Jason Kidd
Deron Williams
Chris Paul
TJ Ford
Jose Calderon
Andre Miller
Brandon Roy (if u consider him a PG)
Jamaal Tinsley
Gilbert Arenas
Derrick Rose...yea i said it
i have more id even rather be my PG than these but ima keep it conservative
...all better PGs than Tony Parker. He's one of the better scoring PGs in the league by far, but as far as his skills being transferable at the PG position which is the only position he can play..nahhhhh he wouldn't look nearly this good around diff teams in the league. He doesn't really see the floor well and he's not a good defender despite whatever columnist came up with that rediculous stat saying he was 1st team all NBA defense based on points scored when he was on the floorHe can set other people up, but literally ONLY off his driving which isnt a negative, but he wouldn't be able to do that as much in a diff system. Tim Duncan made like 50% of this man's career. Dude can score at will on the Spurs though, but there's much more to the game than just scoring
Originally Posted by bonafide hustla
yall take it for what yall want. about half of that list is like hands down no brainers. The other half is personal preference b/c I prefer the traditional POINT GUARD and for the record i said they were better in POINT GUARDING. Being a POINT GUARD is not just scoring or driving and drawing defenses and dumping off to a big man. You have to control a team's flow, ball movement, make good decisions and a host of other things. TPs only decision is drive and if its way too clogged dump off to TD. Most of the time he can go with option 1 b/c he's so quick and it never matters. Pay attention to his decision making skills when he has to though. He misses open players in transition. It's not exposed in the half court b/c he's not even really controlling the offense.
Not that it justifies me more than any next man, but I'm sure I watch like 10x as much basketball as the majority of you dudes, so I aint really trippin on yalls opinions cuz thats all it is at the end of the day. opinion. and again I fully stand behind my statement that those guys are better at playing the POINT GUARD position than Tony Parker
and its cool if somebody doesn't agree with everyone on that list, but whoever said they'd take Tony Parker over all of those POINT GUARDS other than Chris Paul needs a severe backhand. That is outrageous. matter fact, TMAC is a better POINT GUARD than Tony Parker
Originally Posted by koolbarbone
Seriously. I wish I was here to see the Tony Delk HOF posts.Originally Posted by DOWNTOWN43
so he scores 50 and the HOF threads start coming?
Originally Posted by bonafide hustla
yall take it for what yall want. about half of that list is like hands down no brainers. The other half is personal preference b/c I prefer the traditional POINT GUARD and for the record i said they were better in POINT GUARDING. Being a POINT GUARD is not just scoring or driving and drawing defenses and dumping off to a big man. You have to control a team's flow, ball movement, make good decisions and a host of other things. TPs only decision is drive and if its way too clogged dump off to TD. Most of the time he can go with option 1 b/c he's so quick and it never matters. Pay attention to his decision making skills when he has to though. He misses open players in transition. It's not exposed in the half court b/c he's not even really controlling the offense.
Not that it justifies me more than any next man, but I'm sure I watch like 10x as much basketball as the majority of you dudes, so I aint really trippin on yalls opinions cuz thats all it is at the end of the day. opinion. and again I fully stand behind my statement that those guys are better at playing the POINT GUARD position than Tony Parker
and its cool if somebody doesn't agree with everyone on that list, but whoever said they'd take Tony Parker over all of those POINT GUARDS other than Chris Paul needs a severe backhand. That is outrageous. matter fact, TMAC is a better POINT GUARD than Tony Parker
Originally Posted by Djoker33
I agree, i believe he could score alot more if he wanted to, but he does exactly what the team needs him to....and i believe duncan is a big part of his sucess but i dont think duncan is the one breaking ankles and making the opposition miss on blocks. You gotta respect his game. And im not even a Parker fan
TP was driving baseline, getting ready to jump but his left ankle turned to the side.Originally Posted by Clutchshooter
^ not watching that game, elaborate.
Originally Posted by Clutchshooter
^ not watching that game, elaborate.