- Nov 3, 2011
- 26,536
- 29,753
You using goals and assists to explain why Pogba, a midfielder, is less influential than Sturridge, a forward, is a reason why people should ignore you.
**** all that though my guy Axel on
Damn you! Why couldn't I have put it to simply.
In response to y'all hypocritical thinking as @NorthOaklandFC so eloquently put it, but of course y'all gonna ignore it cause it don't suit y'all alternative facts having selvesTo me that's looking at in a vacuum. I don't think it's categorically true that forwards are of greater intrinsic value than central midfielders.
Even harder than scoring goals is creating goals. A central midfielder of Pogba's caliber gets paid to score goals, create goals, and prevent the opposition from scoring goals. That sounds like damn good positional value to me.
I wasn't implying that anyone said midfielders aren't important to the team either. All I said was to valuate Pogba based on what positions he doesn't play on the field is flawed.
Yes forwards can appear* to win you games by themselves but citing the greatest player of all time isn't a good example. Sticking with Barca though, what about their 08/09 CL winning season? Samuel Eto scored +30 goals, was he more influential than Xavi? What about 2011, David Villa scored 25 across competitions. Far more goals than Iniesta, was he more valuable?
But we got sidetracked here. My point wasn't who's more valuable or influential, FW or CM.
I just think placing a cap on Pogba's value explicitly because of the nature of his position is flawed. Pogba was the most expensive player ever due to the market growth rate we see year-to-year in the sport. EPL playing with monopoly money this year dramatized that market growth.
Nah playa, I saw that.
You said "and you talk out of your backside"
Stop talking out y'all backsideNah playa, I saw that.
You said "and you talk out of your backside"
Last edited: