Mr Dink
formerly foamposite xi
- Oct 8, 2012
- 12,106
- 10,320
Retro+ = non-OG colorway. Retro = shoe that came out years ago that is being brough back, regardless of color.So ur saying a Retro+ and a Retro mean the EXACT same thing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Retro+ = non-OG colorway. Retro = shoe that came out years ago that is being brough back, regardless of color.So ur saying a Retro+ and a Retro mean the EXACT same thing.
I know exactly what the differences are between a retro, retro+, and an OG cw retro in terms of JB anyway. I was tryin to help someone else out. Aint even really no point in even havin that discussion right now its not even relevant.Retro+ = non-OG colorway. Retro = shoe that came out years ago that is being brough back, regardless of color.
No. A retro+ is a new or non original colorway. The baron ix would be a retro+ as well as the laney v. Neither were original releases. We are in a time now where retros of retro+ jordans are occurring however.
obviously it's not---I don't see a resounding number of people agreeing with you. So I'mma say....
yea, no. Def not "obvious." Now, it may be your OPINION, but very far from obvious. Extremely even. I mean if you talkin' bout STRICTLY OGs then yea..... but these new Retro + CWs can go to hell in a hand basket.
yes, a lot of this is true. there are more bad retro+ than good. there are a lot of Frankenstein crap shoes. the quality has gone down. but you can CERTAINLY ball In retro jordans.... frankly I laugh at people who complain like crazy and say you can't. you definitely can just as well as any 200 dollar nike. as for the black/red thing, I would rather wear a bulls cw Jordan everyday for the rest of my life than wear a flower print 200 dollar hypebeast shoe once. or some fruity pebble baby stuff. idk lebrons, kobes, and kd's and now even drose shoes seem like they have IMMATURE looking colorways almost every time. But if you want to be hip and rock the highlighter oranges and yellows on your feet in your 20s and 30s, by all means go for it. As far as I'm concerned that stuff is ok for like highschool ballers/students who are still very young and growing up but some clown in his 20s thinking he's killing it in the latest "fruity pebbels jawns" needs to wake up and realize he ain't tight . just my opinion ofc but damn every shoe does not need a theme to be nice. so many ppl out here hyping **** up that we get the "championship pack" with glow in the dark cigar and champagne shoes, fruity pebbles lebrons, flowers, ugly sweater, I mean the list goes on. I fail to see how any of that sht is cool on it's own people only get obsessed with it because it's on a limited shoe that they like. it's so random and corny imho.
Lol i dunno why everybody keeps calling all these new colorway Js a retro+. It can't be a retro+ if its a colorway that has never been seen before. We havent had any REAL Retro+ since the Laneys since they originally dropped as just a RETRO in 2000. Plus why type a + sign forn o reason
WrongThat's what a retro+ is
Once again a retro+ is a non og colorway that is being re retroed. A Retro is brand new colorway. Baron 1s and 9s, infra 3, pb3, vg10, cg10 all are just RETROS. Sorry Magic1978 but ur wrong on this one buddy.
No. A retro+ is a new or non original colorway. The baron ix would be a retro+ as well as the laney v. Neither were original releases. We are in a time now where retros of retro+ jordans are occurring however.
THIS.you right... I googled it and back in the early 00s they used the retro + thing, now everything just says retro on the box.
Every NON OG retro Jordan is not a RETRO+ which is what ur saying.Fall back kid
Read and learn
For example black and chrome VIII's had retro+ on the box, meaning it wasn't an OG colorway.
Every NON OG retro Jordan is not a RETRO+ which is what ur saying.
Its obvious that u have them and still dont know what it means.You have no clue what you're talking about
It's obvious you've never had a retro+ box.
Back when they first were retroing models(late 90's-early 00's) they did use the "+" for any non original color. That includes the "Laney" 5, white/navy/Columbia 4, etc...I think they did away with that now, as far as labeling it that way on the box.Every NON OG retro Jordan is not a RETRO+ which is what ur saying.
Agreed. ReppedBack when they first were retroing models(late 90's-early 00's) they did use the "+" for any non original color. That includes the "Laney" 5, white/navy/Columbia 4, etc...I think they did away with that now, as far as labeling it that way on the box.
I think back then JB was going to release them with the mostly infra-red midsole as some catalogs showed them as and at last minute JB changed the colorblocking back to OG form and then we we're left with that infamous sample.As for retro+, can anyone explain this especially on an OG colorway. I always knew that Retro+ is on non - OG colorways, but why on this? This always boggles me. I think that the 2000's said deep infrared as opposed to infrared.