- 7,004
- 522
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2001
Is it really necessary to get rid of Megan at this point?
So they don't have to split half their supplies
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Is it really necessary to get rid of Megan at this point?
it's getting boring, it might just be time to end it..
kings with pet tigers? really?
negan still a fool though..
I disagree. Ezekial has potential to be a very interesting character and I feel like Kirkman will have him around for a while (the last time a newly introduced character got their own cover was Michonne, and you see how long she's been around). I'm curious who Negan apparently killed on the cover of #111 (for those who haven't seen it yet: http://i.imgur.com/EuESgKC.jpg).I feel the eggsack same way.
I can't wait for this entire arc to be over with.
This. Nothing happens.this ish is boring now.
This. Nothing happens.
This is an interesting tidbits from the "Letter Hacks" page:
[table][tr][td]
[/td][/tr][/table]"Okay, if you're not up on all the Walking Dead news that's spun out of this summer, let's recap: ALL OUT WAR starts in #115. It will run 12 Issues. Those 12 issues will come out from October to April. That's one year of TWD mainlined in 7 months."
Okay, so we're getting TWO issues per month starting in October? Interesting. At least we don't have to wait a whole goddamn year to get rid of this Negan ********.
Interesting issue. Negan is an interesting adversary. If you really think about it, what bad has he really done? He killed Glenn after Rick killed 3 or 4 of his dudes, thats about it really. He's been more than reasonable with Rick. He could have killed Carl but he let him go unharmed. If you look at it, between Rick and Negan, whose realy the bad guy?
Oh...
shiva