- Jun 24, 2016
- 1,030
- 772
Don't like to pass immediate judgement, but these look very underwhelming...like takedowns.
Maybe Nike is doing this on purpose, pricing these at $160 and having them look like plain takedowns, so that it justifies pricing retros that might possibly release at premium prices ($220ish)?
Maybe Nike is doing this on purpose, pricing these at $160 and having them look like plain takedowns, so that it justifies pricing retros that might possibly release at premium prices ($220ish)?
Last edited: