- Dec 7, 2006
- 12,393
- 7,890
The only 2 acceptable variations were the '12s and the c3.0s. The waterproof or whatever was trash.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and the hyperfusesThe only 2 acceptable variations were the '12s and the c3.0s. The waterproof or whatever was trash.
these are fire
How many times are they gonna retro the infrareds
Just put my 2010s in the washing machine over the summer and they look DS again. I was shocked.
i wish they would retro the laser blue or the mesa's as much as the infrareds
i like those 2 cws way more than the infrareds
its about time for you to quit buying AM90s cuz nike is not gonna go back to the pre 2012 shape, it will only get worse imothe nylon, the mold, the shape, just not the same no more.
its about time for you to quit buying AM90s cuz nike is not gonna go back to the pre 2012 shape, it will only get worse imo
im fully aware that they dont look the same as before, but for me the current shape from the upper is still acceptable
hopefully it will stay like that and not gonna go downhill in the future, but you'll never know with damn nike nowadays :x
A tiny bit on the inside of the toe box. Doesn't come out well in the pics, but attached them for you amyway[/quote]
appreciate it man
what kind detergent u use? if u use any
90s shape is not nearly as bad as the 1s shape
Those are quite tacky.
my local foot locker manager showed me these cws last week and told me that they will sell them instore next week
24 november on footlocker
are the air maxes in your avi yours?
my local foot locker manager showed me these cws last week and told me that they will sell them instore next week
and also he asked me if i was interested in them and if i want them to stash away 2 pairs for me
but i declined their offer cuz it was not really my cup of tea
material wise they were pretty good but the shape from the am1 was just horrible imo