- 12,333
- 7,856
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2006
I would take it easy with the denim when wearing these. Too much is too much.
id never wear denim with my denims. too much matching imo. i wore them once and with khakis since it was casual friday.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I would take it easy with the denim when wearing these. Too much is too much.
id never wear denim with my denims. too much matching imo. i wore them once and with khakis since it was casual friday.
exactly. some people tryna dress like theyre wearing a denim jumpsuit.
Should at least one of the colors on the kicks match your outfit? or is that too much? Say like those teal ones that just came up, would you wear black bottoms and a plain teal shirt? or is this too much, what your thoughts?
yea i think some ppl can def. pull it off. I try not to match but sometimes I just can't help it hahaha. If i do i'll do it subtle. However i'm trying to stay clear from that. Like you said let the shoes speak for themselves. I have worn the denims a couple of times and just suck with gray and black gear.For me personally I don't match the colors of my shoes to any of my clothes. Now catch me in 03 i wouldve been coordinated exactly with the matching hat, shirt, shoes, heck even sometimes my jeans would matchbut I'm too old for that now a days I'm usually in a plain colored button up, or a black or grey tee with some fitted denim and I let the shoes speak for themselves.
But to each their own, I still see some kids around my city or on Instagram who do the matchy matchy thing and they pull it off
the pair with the nubuck is probably a unreleased pre-production sample
Oh and as you know I've been waiting for any info on these for a stateside release so I don't have to pay 180 on euro sites. But these joints are fake right? I'd post in the legit check forum but the nike legit checks hardly get any views. I mean, these don't even have nubuck on the toebox. And the dark grey is supposed to be nubuck or suede too, right? Unless they changed something last minute? Again, I'm an AM 90 noob. I'm expert at spotting GM J's, but these I'm noob as hell. These are fake, yes?
Thanks. Repped. So I can rest assure that the shoes pictured are the real deal? I don't like them as much without the nubuck hits, but I still really like the colorway so I'll cop. Found them for 105 shipped. Another noob question. The LTR stands for leather? In reference to the use of leather instead of mesh?
the pair with the nubuck is probably a unreleased pre-production sample
nike scraped the nubuck for the final retail version, so you now have leather on the mudguard and on the toebox
thanx for the dropping the knowledgeAKsuited- Those are legit. Theres actual 2 different versions of the same CW,
Thanks for the info guys. Both of you repped.AKsuited- Those are legit. Theres actual 2 different versions of the same CW, using different materials for each. The all leather joints seemed to have dropped here in the U.S. ( 652980-002 LTR) Where as the Suede version ( 666578-003) has dropped across the waters. From what Ive seen- Size?, Kickz , Titolo.....etc.
better you wait a lil bit, maybe the suede version will come to the US
Thanks for the info guys. Both of you repped.
Oh well...I really wanted the suede versions, but it looks like 160ish shipped for those. I couldn't pass up the regular leather ones for 105 shipped on Ebay even though I like the other ones more. I mean, damn, it's a 60 dollar difference.
You really think so? I hope not, I already copped the leather joints off ebay for 105 shipped
better you wait a lil bit, maybe the suede version will come to the US