- Feb 2, 2008
- 40,883
- 46,999
yea 2020 joint wilddddd slimmer
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I had to look for the difference in person. It isn’t that noticeable.Theyre all prob a bit mismatched in some way. Look at the Volts. The tongue liner and insole isnt even close to the other parts. The purps most likely look fine in person. I have a feeling its mostly due to the camera.
Just not a fan, huh? That's disappointing.I do know I’m in less of a hurry to copp all these new joints now though
Chunky but still kept a sleek stance though. The Chunkiness has nothing to do with the recent toebox and MG problems. I keep referring to the 2000s, the Golden age, but they were perfect back then imo, a little Chunky but still had that sleek overall shape Construction and materials were all on point.So glad they’re doing away with AM90 bulkiness. Never understood why a running shoe should be bulky. That’s the main thing that’s deterred me away from 90s for so many years minus the infrared cw (I always copp those regardless). I love the OG running shoe shape vs what we’ve always gotten. The bulbous toe box and extremely high mudguard will not be missed.
Love the CW, Not a fan of the build. The changes seem more performance than OG to me. I love that we’re gettin love, I just wish they did the same as they did with 87s.Just not a fan, huh? That's disappointing.
More performance? What do you mean? Visually they look like an og-clone to me.Chunky but still kept a sleek stance though. The Chunkiness has nothing to do with the recent toebox and MG problems. I keep referring to the 2000s, the Golden age, but they were perfect back then imo, a little Chunky but still had that sleek overall shape Construction and materials were all on point.
I get not liking the silhouette. I’m just pointing out that the recent 90 problems aren’t synonymous with Bulkiness lol
Love the CW, Not a fan of the build. The changes seem more performance than OG to me. I love that we’re gettin love, I just wish they did the same as they did with 87s.
I’m talking about the actual build. They seem really light and flimsy.More performance? What do you mean? Visually they look like an og-clone to me.
Ahh gotcha. You're talking materials. I thought you were talking build.I’m talking about the actual build. They seem really light and flimsy.
Hell I like both lol@cumma Those Crocs have a mustache lol
Volts came in... Final answer on these now that I have a couple in hand, they might have gone a little OD with the performance upgrades.
I think you could actually run in these now? Lol
That synthetic micro suede is flimsy af and prone to toe dents. MGs are small, but I can learn to live with em.
I am having a little trouble processing the loss of 90 Chunkiness though. They’re almost like a different shoe.
heres a side by side with 2011 Volts
2020s still look rough without shoe trees
they look much better on foot than they do in hand now lol
more like keep the production cost as low as possible, am90s are lifestyle shoes they are not made for running lolThe changes seem more performance than OG to me.
That’s fair. It’s just something that made 90s, 90s imo. All just one mans opinion thoughWow. Never heard of a *running shoe being built for performance.
they changed the shape in 2012 when the faux vintage infrareds dropped and in 2015 those clowns changed it againIs it just me or is the toe less bulbous on the 2011/2012? That volt from then is one of my favorites, too!
They seem really light
Hopefully I can cop all of them with the swoosh account. That'd be saving me a lot of money. .
I like the sleekness of the them. Very clean. 2 of each for me.