elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 106,424
- 195,857
Is it too early to say Luka > Dirk?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is it too early to say Luka > Dirk?
Is it too early to say Luka > Dirk?
Making note of this...
Is it too early to say Luka > Dirk?
Those years where the final scores would be 88 to 94.
Pacing was trash, spacing was trash, scoring was trash. Bogged down offenses
It was an ethical 70. That matters.Tonight was cool and all but we might not make the playoffs
....multiple things can be true.…. No. Defense was just good
Would be helpful if your second best player wasn’t a part timer.Tonight was cool and all but we might not make the playoffs
True story. Iso heavy craze as wellPredictable offense with minimal ball and player movement makes defenses look good.
To me that’s more of what was going on in the dead-ball era than the defenses actually being more elite.
Once his body is adjusted to playing more minutes I don't see what's stopping him from that eventually.His passing is a nice surprise. Could he avg 30, 10+, 5 and 5 one season down the road?
That would definitely be a first.
....multiple things can be true.
Like offenses were *** and defenses were good too back then
Kinda like how you owe multiple debts to multiple ppl.
Multiple true statements can exist simultaneously
I for one am here for someone scoring 70 every season.
Also we need to strike this supposed 100 point game from the books. It didn't happen.
Predictable offense with minimal ball and player movement makes defenses look good.
To me that’s more of what was going on in the dead-ball era than the defenses actually being more elite.