darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 47,495
- 32,314
I mean... obviously... but...
Our defense is so different without AD.
Our defense is so different without AD.
||The Official Los Angeles Rams Season Thread||
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by casper90403,
- Start date
- Feb 23, 2010
- 23,510
- 26,660
The rookies not shrinking in the moment and playing solid D is a great sign
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 47,495
- 32,314
Gaaaahhhh.
He had Kupp.
Ballsy call.
Me no likey. Punt that way.
He had Kupp.
Ballsy call.
Me no likey. Punt that way.
- Aug 13, 2011
- 8,682
- 3,391
We got this
- Sep 5, 2010
- 94,282
- 131,811
Kyren needs his *** beat for running out of bounds with two mins and change left.
HIM
Supporter
- May 10, 2006
- 27,783
- 65,442
In hindsight, it didn't matter. Still a dumb play tho.
Stafford got lucky with that dropped pick
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 47,495
- 32,314
Well this sucks.
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 47,495
- 32,314
They just marched straight downfield.
Cotdamb.
Cotdamb.
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 47,495
- 32,314
#welp
- Feb 23, 2010
- 23,510
- 26,660
HIM
Supporter
- May 10, 2006
- 27,783
- 65,442
This was the biggest play imo. We would have gone up 6+ if he hangs on
- Nov 25, 2017
- 4,091
- 4,710
tough L.
on to AZ.
tought not having pakua & offensive line not healthy.
on to AZ.
tought not having pakua & offensive line not healthy.
- Nov 25, 2017
- 4,091
- 4,710
Johnson & kupp out for a couple weeks now.
team is full of injuries.
forgot to post yesterday's tough L
team is full of injuries.
forgot to post yesterday's tough L
HIM
Supporter
- May 10, 2006
- 27,783
- 65,442
Season might be over in week 2 
0-2 missing our 2 biggest weapons and most of our O-Line for the next month. if we can't win 2 out of the next 3, it might be best to go full tank
0-2 missing our 2 biggest weapons and most of our O-Line for the next month. if we can't win 2 out of the next 3, it might be best to go full tank
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 47,495
- 32,314
Yeah it's been rough, 'specially that Cards game.
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 47,495
- 32,314
I know it's just a 2 game sample size, but 67 points through 2 games.
Can we get Aaron Donald back on line 1?
Can we get Aaron Donald back on line 1?
HIM
Supporter
- May 10, 2006
- 27,783
- 65,442
Let's goooooooooooo
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 47,495
- 32,314
Man that was a fun comeback.
Stafford's deep ball > *
Stafford's deep ball > *
HIM
Supporter
- May 10, 2006
- 27,783
- 65,442
Nah why McVay do his lil bro like that 
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 47,495
- 32,314
I live in Illinois.
I'm just saying, we better not lose this game.
I'm just saying, we better not lose this game.
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 47,495
- 32,314
Interception.
Game: blouses.
I'm not leaving the house.
Puka & Kupp back yet?
Game: blouses.
I'm not leaving the house.
Puka & Kupp back yet?
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 47,495
- 32,314
No AD.
No Puka.
No Kupp.
No Bueno.
No Puka.
No Kupp.
No Bueno.
HIM
Supporter
- May 10, 2006
- 27,783
- 65,442
Should have won every game besides the AZ game
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 47,495
- 32,314
VERY winnable game today.
That missed PAT on the pick 6 in the 1st half totally changed everything at the end of the game.
Pick 6 to go up 6 but could have been up 7.
Pack go on a 17-0 run; down 11 (could be just 10).
We get a TD; down 5 and have to go for 2.
Fail; lose by 5.
If we would have been down 10 after that last Pack TD, we would have gotten our TD + PAT and then been down 3 on our final possession, obviously needing only to get in FG range instead of needing a TD
That missed PAT on the pick 6 in the 1st half totally changed everything at the end of the game.
Pick 6 to go up 6 but could have been up 7.
Pack go on a 17-0 run; down 11 (could be just 10).
We get a TD; down 5 and have to go for 2.
Fail; lose by 5.
If we would have been down 10 after that last Pack TD, we would have gotten our TD + PAT and then been down 3 on our final possession, obviously needing only to get in FG range instead of needing a TD
HIM
Supporter
- May 10, 2006
- 27,783
- 65,442
Don't look now
