The hell are you talking about?
Reps, fakes, bootlegs....they're all the same thing. What's going on here Niketalk?
because of Air Randy IYKYK
oh man... haven't heard anyone bring up that name in a while. I remember all of those PE's and samples from that time
When are the blue releasing?
I think the first time I heard this term was after the 2012 Jordan 6 Olympic retro release when this youtuber, Sneakgeeks, had an early pair but it was found out he had fakes. He was notorious for early release pairs and people started to speculate he had fakes. Then over time people started using the term unauthorized, yadda yadda yadda.
It's not really an opinion, it's technically/legally a fact. If there's a marketplace product and anyone else makes a replication of that product, then they're 'fakes' (as only the original version created by the original creator (brand/enterprise) is authentic). There is obviously a spectrum of 'fakes', from really bad (ie bad likeliness to original in terms of materials, quality... etc.) to well done replications. However, they're all fakes - no ifs or buts about it. People creating customs and/or bespokes aren't creating 'fake' specific products (usually) as they tend to not create exact replicates of original products. They are, however, creating 'fake' Nike (or whatever other brand/enterprise) products. Meaning if someone (other than Nike) makes a bespoke 'Air Max 1', then it's simply that artists approximation of an 'Air Max 1'. It's not an actual 'Air Max 1' and not a Nike product - regardless of whether authentic Nike elements were used.
you collect closets?
What are these? They looks like a women's pair from a few years ago but better materials?Struck out on Patta’s. My consolation prize.
AH8145-202.
That's a pair I didn't manage to buy. Regrets, for sure. Dope ones, brah.Sry, no wavey mud, just a regular 87.
There's 3 more coming, not sure the colors though.
