- 8,372
- 48,016
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2016
2004 > 1986If I'm being honest, I prefer the regular build. 2017 > 2023
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
2004 > 1986If I'm being honest, I prefer the regular build. 2017 > 2023
Going to wear my HOA today bc of this post lol2004 > 1986
If I'm being honest, I prefer the regular build. 2017 > 2023
Big bubble reveal. Nice box. Not sure about the laces and shape.
Big bubble reveal. Nice box. Not sure about the laces and shape.
All the better for me....saves me money
Yikes! Sure you have the big bubble, but that mudguard looks like it’s from the “dark age” era. I know it resembles the Original, but the 2017/2022 mold/shape/upper looks so much better to me.
It’s funny because the slim/sleeker “remastered” AM90 looked better than the thick mudguarded mold, while the AM1 looks better with the thick mudguard as opposed to this big bubble upper.
This reminds me of the am1 ultra 3.26… waiting for more images. A lace swap is needed to me (not sure to cop with that first look)
This where I’m at. I think we’ve gotten so use to the shape over the years, or maybe the changes they’ve made over the years have been for the betterI mean... Hey... That's how the OG looked so...yep
Huge fan? Nah
Copping? Yep
This is where I am. The 2017 was based on the Urawa/2005 era shape and I think we all prefer it over the og 86/87 shape these were modeled after. I wish they'd left the upper alone and just slapped a bigger bubble on it. Am1 is one of the only shoes that got better after the og and peaked in that 2005 era. They've been chasing it since then.I mean... Hey... That's how the OG looked so...yep
Huge fan? Nah
Copping? Yep
I think I it was a poor attempt for sureI'll also say 1987 > 1986
Now I wonder, was dark ages 2009-2016 trying to be like the 1986 shape?