- 455
- 620
Haha truth there.haha I hear ya. And yea I realize people won't see them and I'm ok with that. They'd really just be for me. Completely unneeded and unnecessary but the same can be said for anything past like 2 pair of sneakers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haha truth there.haha I hear ya. And yea I realize people won't see them and I'm ok with that. They'd really just be for me. Completely unneeded and unnecessary but the same can be said for anything past like 2 pair of sneakers.
not positive but if it's going to be anything like the OG & Atmos releases last year they will likely be pretty difficult to get from nike/snkrshmm , are these animal print air max 1 releasing on air max day hyped up ? i badly want a pair of them
Alot of L's will be handed out.!!!Animals will be difficult.
You put the names Atmos, Parra, or Patta next to an Air Max 1, guaranteed difficult cop.
https://www.sneakersnstuff.com/en/product/30941/nike-air-max-1-anniversaryanyone know where the aquas in a mens 8.5 or obsidian mens 8.5 could be had
Hypothetical:
You buy mint ds 1999 og mesh og red and obsidians. Still factory laced. Just gorgeous. Do you keep them ds as collectibles or do you wear them, inevitably have the midsoles crumble, and then swap them out and continue wearing them?
I'm torn on it. They make for some sick collectibles but I wear my ****. But then I have the 2017 version to wear, why do I need to wear the 1999?
What would you do?
Ugh I agree so much with what you're saying. Honestly my biggest issue is cutting up a ds pair from 1999 and swapping it. It's like buying a Picasso and then making edits to it. It would hurt my soul.I'm not in the exact same situation as you as i don't own retros of my 1991 BW leathers (they never released that's why), but I can guarantee you that i'll wear to death my '91 after soleswaping them, soon or late.
I see vintage AMs like an opportunity to have better AMs than the currents, because they are the OGs, the shape, the comfort of the upper (having tried on vintage BWs and 95s and current BWs and 95s, i can guarantee that there a difference with the upper's comfort, more padding,the shape follows the foot's shape, remember that the OGs were running shoes),etc BUT they need to be functionnal, so a soleswap is necessary
I don't buy vintage for display, it is for me a waste of money...imo
Ugh I agree so much with what you're saying. Honestly my biggest issue is cutting up a ds pair from 1999 and swapping it. It's like buying a Picasso and then making edits to it. It would hurt my soul.
Ahh yea, we're very different there. I buy new and old. I don't discriminate. If all you buy is old then you have no choice but to swap. I really really really want to swap and wear them but I just don't know if I can bring myself to do it. It's like buying a ds 57 Corvette and then ripping the engine out of it. But if the engine doesn't work, you have to swap it out right? Ugh.you're right, that's why on my '91 BW, i will soleswap it so that there is not a single difference between the OG and the final product (bubble's color, outsole, etc will be exactly the same), i won't really see the difference, apart from a 50% tinier bubble and no forefoot air bubble lol, but with my 95s i will take more liberty as they will become beaters
but again, you're right; maybe the main difference between us is that i buy no more current releases (only pre-2000) and that my '91 BW's sole is already crumbling lol
that would explain the differences in our reasoning
It's like buying a ds 57 Corvette and then ripping the engine out of it. But if the engine doesn't work, you have to swap it out right? Ugh.
That's crazy that Nike really allowed a reseller to make his own Nike's and then resell them for astronomical prices.
HAHAHAHAHAHA
I doubt they are allowing it. He doesn't even have a Nike account. They can't threaten him with cancelling his account. I'm sure he already has his allotment for the release. This is why Nike should have NEVER allowed him to even be in the vote.That's crazy that Nike really allowed a reseller to make his own Nike's and then resell them for astronomical prices.