- Jun 19, 2005
- 10,074
- 5,885
Those look black. And I really need a black pair like that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure about the shape, not an expertThe supposedly great new shape is nowhere near as ergodynamic and comfortable as Air Max models of the past few years. The angles are all wrong and the toe area is oddly slanted. I don’t understand why Nike changed it. All these releases of original color combinations are ruined now.
less full of speed??? Less toe room??? Are you shrek?Can someone explain to me what is so good about the "new shape"? I know people have hassled me here for saying that I prefer the old shape before this year, so what exactly is so good now? Honestly, I'm trying to understand. I've been looking at pairs of shoes next to each other. The new shape feels so much less full of speed with the less angled lines, and the toe area has a lot less room. Someone please enlighten me.
I'm pretty sure (although I can't prove it, of course) that professional runners would be able to run faster in the shape before 2017, than they can in this "amazing" new shape. The lines in the material construction and comfort was just superior. And, no, I'm not a Sheik.less full of speed??? Less toe room??? Are you shrek?
Can someone explain to me what is so good about the "new shape"? I know people have hassled me here for saying that I prefer the old shape before this year, so what exactly is so good now? Honestly, I'm trying to understand. I've been looking at pairs of shoes next to each other. The new shape feels so much less full of speed with the less angled lines, and the toe area has a lot less room. Someone please enlighten me.
Yes, the REAL old shape that was so nice. Not the odd shape that Nike has started to make their Air Max 1s in this year. Have you ever seen any of the Air Max 1s fron back then? They’re beautiful, mate. And more powerful and... they looked like they were shot from a canon. POW.So we’re clear - 2012 air max is the old shape for you?
I'm pretty sure (although I can't prove it, of course) that professional runners would be able to run faster in the shape before 2017, than they can in this "amazing" new shape. The lines in the material construction and comfort was just superior. And, no, I'm not a Sheik.
Now I know without a doubt you’re a troll. HahahahaYes, the REAL old shape that was so nice. Not the odd shape that Nike has started to make their Air Max 1s in this year. Have you ever seen any of the Air Max 1s fron back then? They’re beautiful, mate. And more powerful and... they looked like they were shot from a canon. POW.
the dude was talking before that he rock hickies in his am1, of course he is trolling what else ??Now I know without a doubt you’re a troll.
WTF? Last time I checked, the Air Max 1 was a RUNNING SHOE. Am I in the wrong forum here???You see professional runners now wearing AM1’s? Amateurs? I run, never in an am1. Only time I run in an AM1 is if it’s unexpected.
WTF? Last time I checked, the Air Max 1 was a RUNNING SHOE. Am I in the wrong forum here???
Alright if you're not trolling by saying roshes are running shoes, I'm outAM1 is a “running shoe” the same as an Air Force 1 is a “basketball shoe”. It’s 2017 man, frees and rosche runs exist. But hey if you like running in them than I’ll support it. Happy holidays.