- 1,869
- 316
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2012
I said they used to be considered the standard bearer of their time. NOT of now or all time. Before you lecture other people on reading comprehension, learn a little humility and set your elitism aside. Back then they were seen as a significant improvement over previous releases like the DMPs. Thats why MJO23DAN felt '13s were so well done. I didn't compare them to Banned for the simple reason they were such a one off that Jordan brand gave us that its hard to justify using them as the standard bearers. The same reason I wouldn't use the BIN23 Premio collection as standard bearers. Also, I don't need the opinions of a YouTuber to tell me how I should feel. I can formulate my own ideas. That is the real disease of this generation. Looking onto others to know how one should feel.
The 2013 Bred 1s as the "standard?" LOL
The 2013 Bred 1s as the most top notch Bred 1 of its time, even better than past Bred 1s including the 2011 Banned? Really bro? Or maybe you're just suffering from hype disease just like thousands of others around the world. Yeah that's probably it.
And oh, before I forget, maybe you should comment on MJO23DAN's video above on youtube and ask him if he thinks the 2013s are overpriced at $600-800 and if they're slightly, just slightly , overrated based on quality and materials used.
After all, if you didn't catch it, he ranked the 2013's in LAST PLACE when compared to the '85s, '94, 2011, and 2001. So much for the '13 being "the standard."