- Apr 22, 2012
- 85,109
- 113,886
I tell youYou mean like 'Cuse did in the 80's with their orange Dunk's?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I tell youYou mean like 'Cuse did in the 80's with their orange Dunk's?
Just offer a kid $280 for size 9.5 he passed, that's $120 profit, smh
for those that have both 2013 and 2016, is it worth it to chase down a 2016 pair for resell if you already have the 2013? The pictures seem to be a huge difference but what about in person, in hand?
for those that have both 2013 and 2016, is it worth it to chase down a 2016 pair for resell if you already have the 2013? The pictures seem to be a huge difference but what about in person, in hand?
for those that have both 2013 and 2016, is it worth it to chase down a 2016 pair for resell if you already have the 2013? The pictures seem to be a huge difference but what about in person, in hand?
I looked at em and immediately thought "I could rock those with Knicks gear"
eh...seriously doubt the Yeezy (or Skateboard P NMD drop) will effect the resell game on these. For the need to undercut your profit margin on these you would have to assume the next retro is not that far around the corner....and while JB is definetly in taxSZN with the 2013 turnaround time don't see these coming through for another 5-7 years. 1s are like bonds you hold on to them you don't cash them in early for the latest tech public offering. Flippers are getting off Nylon 12s, NMD wools, et al....for Yeezys.
My older brother just came up on a pair of 2013 for $180
I have the 2001, 2011 and the 2016s and the 2011 are cool and all but imho they don't touch the 2016 when it comes to that OG feel and shape. Materials on the 2011 are defiantly nice but theres just too much going on with all the X X X X signs in the interior and the big one plastered on the back.Like both, but 2011 > 2016
I have the 2001, 2011 and the 2016s and the 2011 are cool and all but imho they don't touch the 2016 when it comes to that OG feel and shape. Materials on the 2011 are defiantly nice but theres just too much going on with all the X X X X signs in the interior and the big one plastered on the back.
I have the 2001, 2011 and the 2016s and the 2011 are cool and all but imho they don't touch the 2016 when it comes to that OG feel and shape. Materials on the 2011 are defiantly nice but theres just too much going on with all the X X X X signs in the interior and the big one plastered on the back.
If you wanna know if it's a good pair. Take a long sniff and if you get high. They're legit.
I was in the same boat a while ago, but ultimately decided that I needed these '16s. Now that I have both, I'd say, it's worth it. They're both nice of course, but the '16 pair is definitely softer, seems higher quality in terms of the leather used on them in comparison (both the tumbled red and the black sections), though not an OG detail, I like the tumbled portions, and I love the details and callbacks to the original '85 pair.for those that have both 2013 and 2016, is it worth it to chase down a 2016 pair for resell if you already have the 2013? The pictures seem to be a huge difference but what about in person, in hand?
Truth. My pair is from a JCPenney employee from 1985. The box has multiple price stickers. $64.99 > Reduced to $39.99 > Reduced to $19.99. He told me with his employee discount he paid around $13.00.Nike oversaturated the market with I's in 1985. They were eventually liquidated for less than $20/pair. Stocking up on those and clearanced vintage Star Wars toys would've paid off huge!