- 3,538
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2008
I'm a BMW type of guy, but the new mustang's interior really isn't bad. You're making it out to be some kind of horrendous, unbearable interior when in reality it is decent.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
thats all these guys can do to try an bring down mustangs is talk about interior. once they cant say anything about the engine they move onto the interior like anyone cares lulz.Originally Posted by nawlinsjunkie
I'm a BMW type of guy, but the new mustang's interior really isn't bad. You're making it out to be some kind of horrendous, unbearable interior when in reality it is decent.
Originally Posted by mases apprentice
This is why i think american cars suck.
Originally Posted by RFX45
With all these interior talks, to me it doesn't matter if it's retro inspired or modern but it has to be of good quality, especially for that price. For a $60k-$70k car, I don't want painted plastics and fake aluminum trims. That is why even if I looking for a fast car, the ZR1 is probably not going to be on my short list because they feel cheap inside and out. For the price, I'd probably get an R8 or an Aston Martin V8 Vantage and sacrifice the power. I know others opinion may vary but to me that plays a part in the vehicle.
The market Ford is after with the Mustang doesn't really care about the interior and materials and all that non sense. A new Mustang GT can be had for $30k that will keep up with an E92 M3 around a track. For half the price something is sacrificed so of course the materials in the interior will be of lesser quality in the Mustang. And why are you comparing a LUXURY car makers interior with a Mustang. If you wanna compare the Mustangs interior compare it with the Camaro or Challenger. And yes, the live rear axle isn't the greatest setup but its quick enough for a Boss 302 to dust several other sports cars past its price range around a track.Originally Posted by mases apprentice
omg you guys act like it changed dramatically.
vs
This is why i think american cars suck.
a mustang is fast.... but that is all it does! 60k dollars for a live rear axle, horrible interior, and no mouth dropping exterior.
if its not a corvette. its trash. cst-v gets a pass. even though im not a fan. Jeeps also get a pass.
Originally Posted by xsalvioutlawx
I'll take a base model 2012 Corvette over this Mustang.
This isn't a base model, but ahhh baby.
The M5 will be NO WHERE close to 144k. The reason being is that BMW NA accounts for the largest percentage of M5's sold, so we here in the US get a HUGE discount as opposed to some other countries. You can't just use an exchange rate. It starts around 90,000 and a fully optioned M5 will be around 104K max.Originally Posted by jrdnsrnss
I was going with the price cguy610 wrote. Just clicked the link and said its 100,000 euros and after exchange rates comes out to $144,000 US. Said US price probably won't be that high due to the VAT Europe has.Originally Posted by KayCurrency
...The price is speculated to be around $95k... IDK where $144k came from.Originally Posted by jrdnsrnss
With the price tag difference between the V and M5 it better be a faster car. That's the biggest thing with American car performance, bang for the buck. Yeah the M5 is faster but you can pick up a brand new CTS-V and one of the new Shelby GT500's or the Camaro ZL1 for the price of one brand new M5. I love the new M5, beautiful design and its up there with the E39 M5 for my favorite M5 but the price is ridiculous. $144K.
....It's all talk right now though, nothing official
This is my personal opinion, but I was a former Cadillac owner, and when I blew a rod in the $12k engine I decided to just get a new car. I looked at everything from Toyotas to the CTS sedan to the new Ford Focus and BMWs. The Focus, CTS, and BMWs had interiors with so many goddammed buttons that I thought I was going to lose my mind.Originally Posted by jrdnsrnss
The market Ford is after with the Mustang doesn't really care about the interior and materials and all that non sense. A new Mustang GT can be had for $30k that will keep up with an E92 M3 around a track. For half the price something is sacrificed so of course the materials in the interior will be of lesser quality in the Mustang. And why are you comparing a LUXURY car makers interior with a Mustang. If you wanna compare the Mustangs interior compare it with the Camaro or Challenger. And yes, the live rear axle isn't the greatest setup but its quick enough for a Boss 302 to dust several other sports cars past its price range around a track.Originally Posted by mases apprentice
omg you guys act like it changed dramatically.
vs
This is why i think american cars suck.
a mustang is fast.... but that is all it does! 60k dollars for a live rear axle, horrible interior, and no mouth dropping exterior.
if its not a corvette. its trash. cst-v gets a pass. even though im not a fan. Jeeps also get a pass.
looks are subjective, and I honestly hope you don't think the CTS-V with the LSA will outperform the F10 M5...Originally Posted by Zyzz
id still take a CTS-V over an M5 anyday, looks and performance wise>>>>>>M5.
Got one on the way man. I'm doing Euro Delivery on an '11 Lemans Blue/ Fox Red M3 Sedan (basically loaded w/ 19" competition wheels). I think my E90 M3 is the last one made (Production finished Oct 29).Originally Posted by CAFinest23
Originally Posted by bruza
M3 >>>>
Ask me how I know
How do you know? Basically asking you to post pics of your M3 I want one bad or an 2000-2003 m5
This is the reason why I love my Magnum SRT8.Originally Posted by NikeAirsNCrispyTees
I guess I just prefer straightforward and simple vs. "luxury". I don't even want any screens in my cars. Ever.
(Leather seats are a must though— you can't go back after having leather seats.)
Originally Posted by Thizz Marley
but even comparing to the gt500 it isn't meant to be plush and comfortable. its meant to go fast. luxury ain't the focus. so why compare it to the BMW?
and I hate mustangs if it matters.
Originally Posted by Thizz Marley
but even comparing to the gt500 it isn't meant to be plush and comfortable. its meant to go fast. luxury ain't the focus. so why compare it to the BMW?
and I hate mustangs if it matters.