D
Deleted member 37467
Guest
You would have to keep said boxer at kicking range, which is easier said than done.
I'm gonna have to slide into Dana's DM's and tell him to throw big $ @ Spence so we can get our answer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You would have to keep said boxer at kicking range, which is easier said than done.
Aldo is trying hard to get on the November card at MSG, said he'd fight anyone. Cub's wife is apparently expecting so he might not be available
Dude definitely wants to get his contracted MMA fights in so he can consider boxing
you thinking of matt schaub, the qb?Schaub is ALOT more intelligent than i initially used to give him credit for. I guess he did go to UVA he jus soundsss like a meathead imbecile
He's right though
Bruh .. first of all Im not giving a Boxer a great chance and second this is the lack of understanding what was said.No he's not It's not only "take downs" in MMA... Boxers are focused on upper body, how about leg kicks to head? Body? Legs?
But whatever, this is all conjecture anyway. Your 0% seems like more of an emotional than a logical assessment to me, but we'll never get the chance to see it unless the UFC wants to throw big money at somebody. So who cares, for now at least.
Yeah bro.... like Nate Diaz said, Floyd would get demolish and embarrass way worse than Conor in a Boxing ring.
Sorry man, gotta agree with him!
I'll give any MMA a punchers chance to win a boxing ring, than a Boxer in an Octogon!
I'll give any MMA a punchers chance to win a boxing ring, than a Boxer in an Octogon!
Nah. At best 20% chance but that's being very generous. I just don't see any MMA fighters with the necessary know how boxing wise
Acting like everyone is not going to defend their sport.....
If you give a puncher a chance in the ring but not in the Octagon .. is cool ... but we already seen the quickness of Conor in the Octagon ... he has slept dudes without throwing kicks ... or the opponent getting off.
But yet you think a MMA fighter has a better chance in the ring than a boxer in the Octagon ..
Sure buddy.
Let me ask you something, every time I see someone challenge what you said, you always claim they are getting emotional or are mad? Curious to know how old are you to be pulling that childish comment out every single time?You getting way to emotional over this pal.
I'm still taking an MMA fighter in a ring over a Boxer in a Octogon.
It's just that simple. Not bashing anyone or anybody. But I'd feel more comfortable betting some money on the verdict. My take is not facts, it's an opinion. That's it! Literally all it. Don't get so caught up like that my brotha!
Even "no name" fighters, fighter we have never heard of but have a decent record, id give the edge to the MMA fighter.
Let me ask you something, every time I see someone challenge what you said, you always claim they are getting emotional or are mad? Curious to know how old are you to be pulling that childish comment out every single time?
In addition if you read your comments, the fact you said "but he's wrong" means that you think your opinion are facts.
Just learn the difference ...
Damn Def... you actually being more generous than me To me, a punchers chance is close to nothing, more like a possibility. 20% is a good chance bro