The College Basketball Post


Translation =

The initial number offered:

jadakiss-its.gif
 
No threes for Purdue because they are single covering Edey with Clingan.
 
Nothing I’d like more than to see a Hurley lose, because it’s been **** any Hurley for life since ‘91. But eventually I gotta believe UConn’s seemingly unlimited offensive options win out.
 
No threes for Purdue because they are single covering Edey with Clingan.
why impact bigs with size and length on ANY roster is crucial, especially in the pros

If UConn had the shorter Burns instead of the 7 foot Clingan, Purdue would be winning rn
 
Back
Top Bottom