- 14,363
- 3,028
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2003
Originally Posted by sherwin100s
Another thing, what if our shadows are us in the 2nd dimension?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by sherwin100s
Another thing, what if our shadows are us in the 2nd dimension?
no.....common misconception. when we talk about "dimensions," we're talking about spacial dimensions....time is not a spacialdimension.Originally Posted by Redrum SB
the 4th dimension would be someone's past and future all at once, so it's is involved with time.Originally Posted by JOE CAMEL SMOOTH
time isn't a dimensionOriginally Posted by Xtapolapacetl
Man, my tiny brain isn't complex enough to imagine such things. But I thought that the 4th dimension was time. We have three dimensions of space and one dimension of time.
I also heard that in order for "the string theory" to work, there would have to be 9 dimensions or something. Weird.
and it's 11 not nine, but other people think there's more. @*%$ is wild.
Imagine yourself as a giant snake that sprawls out and begins with your birth and end's with your death, that' the 4th dimension.
Originally Posted by StonedFace
So when a dimension is lost so is the real figure? When he puts up the cube in 3d and shows us its 2d shadow and how it is skewed and appears uneven it is that loss of a dimension that makes it appears that way... and by trying to show us a 3d cube into the 4th dimension we we are unable to see the real "tesseract" (however you spell/pronounce it) because we are stuck in the 3rd dimension, but if we were somehow able to see in the 4th dimension that "tesseract" would be perfectly equal.
crazy
Wow, I watched this video sober when you posted it earlier and didnt really understand what he was talking about , smoked a bowl an hour ago,watched it again and that understanding in my first post was produced.. proofOriginally Posted by ATLien Seeko
Originally Posted by StonedFace
So when a dimension is lost so is the real figure? When he puts up the cube in 3d and shows us its 2d shadow and how it is skewed and appears uneven it is that loss of a dimension that makes it appears that way... and by trying to show us a 3d cube into the 4th dimension we we are unable to see the real "tesseract" (however you spell/pronounce it) because we are stuck in the 3rd dimension, but if we were somehow able to see in the 4th dimension that "tesseract" would be perfectly equal.
crazy
Basically. What you saw was a three dimensional "shaddow" of a tesseract.
yup, we cannot see a true tesseract, because we can't perceive the 4th dimension.Originally Posted by ATLien Seeko
Originally Posted by StonedFace
So when a dimension is lost so is the real figure? When he puts up the cube in 3d and shows us its 2d shadow and how it is skewed and appears uneven it is that loss of a dimension that makes it appears that way... and by trying to show us a 3d cube into the 4th dimension we we are unable to see the real "tesseract" (however you spell/pronounce it) because we are stuck in the 3rd dimension, but if we were somehow able to see in the 4th dimension that "tesseract" would be perfectly equal.
crazy
Basically. What you saw was a three dimensional "shaddow" of a tesseract.