silverbackhoney
Banned
- Dec 14, 2014
- 9,160
- 2,675
Embiid is gonna be a bust.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sixers haven't put any effort forth building a balanced team since Hinkie took over. No free agent is walking into a mess like that. Embiid hasn't played a minute in the league and who knows if he even plays this year. So yeah, comparing him to a superstar and top-3 player in the NBA (a guy 1 year older than Embiid) is just foolish and setting yourself up for failure. It's not the best front court in the NBA. It's a good player in Noel, a rookie in Okafor who should become a good player and a center who could turn into Greg Oden 2.0. Maybe if you have some interestign guard prospects people would care, but you don't. Lakers have a better foundation, whether you like it or not.Do the Knicks or Lakers have Embiid, Noel or Okafor to convince young free agents to sign with them?
I think free agents will soon want to play with the future best frontcourt in the league, especially if Embiid turns out to be the next AD like they think he can be.
Just like how I think the Cousins-WCS pairing could turn around the mess that it's been in Sacramento.
Embiid was never supposed to be AD, but he was supposed to be Akeem
Yeah, style. His whole frosh year that was the comparisonin terms of style right, not because AD is better than the Dream?
Philly is probably the least attractive FO destination by far.
What place is less attractive? Idiot gm, (insert coach name here), no proven star players, threat of being traded halfway through the tank, etc etc, where is worse?Hell no
location plays a factor to some degree buts its obviously not the most important.Dude still think that location is the number one factor.
How did that turn out for the Lakers and Knicks?
It's about plan and money.
Where a team is located at is far less important than how competitive a team is.
As it stands now, lal nyc and Philly all won't be fa hotspots come next summer until one of them show that they can be competitive.
What place is less attractive? Idiot gm, (insert coach name here), no proven star players, threat of being traded halfway through the tank, etc etc, where is worse?
not hair splitting at all. la looks way more attractive then philly atm. a reason why LA even took a look at the lakers . why not take a look at philly or other bad squads?Which is worse? You're hair splitting
All those places aren't attractive at all and none of them will attract free agents next summer unless they turn the corner this season and look like a competent franchise.
[/SPOILER]
TBH, geographic location, by itself, is pretty meaningless now unless a player wants to get in on the whole "going home" narrative. Money, front office stability, team fit and best chance to win are the biggest issues for FAs now.
not hair splitting at all. la looks way more attractive then philly atm. a reason why LA even took a look at the lakers . why not take a look at philly or other bad squads?
Follow
Sam Amick [emoji]10004[/emoji]@sam_amick
Mavs owner Mark Cuban, via his Cyber Dust app, makes it clear he's not impressed with DeAndre Jordan's apology.