- Jun 1, 2008
- 38,406
- 7,519
Or maybe he was just shooting blanks. Since his heyday was in the 60s-70s, I doubt he was using condoms much.
Yea he was definitely shooting blanks, he needed that Dwight esque fertileness.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or maybe he was just shooting blanks. Since his heyday was in the 60s-70s, I doubt he was using condoms much.
You did not include the inflation of thots in today's society every where you look there's a Thot bWilt's game with the yambs wouldn't translate to this era. He wouldn't be able to spit over IG or Twitter. It was much easier to slay as a professional basketball player back then. He would have too much competition now.
Wilt's game with the yambs wouldn't translate to this era. He wouldn't be able to spit over IG or Twitter. It was much easier to slay as a professional basketball player back then. He would have too much competition now.
He wouldn't even take a day offWilt couldnt even take a week off to get that baby batter replenished
PER is a overvalued stat
Theres no way David Robinson and Chris Paul are in the same conversation with those other guys
Man what?
Robinson is one of the best centers to ever play and Chris Paul is one of the best pg's ever, you sound crazy.
nah mike smith wasnt too bad last night, the new kid was all over the place though. first asking if cp3 is the goat pg, then when mike smith shut him down he said something like "well according to per cp3 is the greatest pg ever" or somethingExactly. I'm the first to admit Mike Smith says a lot of dumb ****, but if you're going to criticize him, at least do it for stuff he actually says.Dat dere comprehension.
Brian Siemen asked Mike Smith if he's ever seen a better PG than CP3.Mike Smith, the homer, said Magic was better but CP3 is the best PG he's seen since he started broadcasting. I think he's been broadcasting for like 10 years.
I hate Mike Smith as much as you guys but the reaching is outrageous on here.
Wizards would son GS too
PER is a overvalued stat
Theres no way David Robinson and Chris Paul are in the same conversation with those other guys
This is an interesting perspective, anyone agree disagree?Tony Parker's Individual accomplishments really don't measure up at all.
If he didn't play with Timmy....we'd look at him like we view Chauncey Billups.
What do you mean "how"?
how is brandon jennings shooting 13% this week
PER is a overvalued stat
Theres no way David Robinson and Chris Paul are in the same conversation with those other guys
a lot of people don't realize this all PER is are the box score stats . PTS/REB/AST/BLK/STL ect, adjusted for pace of play, league enviroment and weighted for value.
it's just a faster way of saying this guy averaged 20, 12, 5 and with 2 blocks and 1.5 stls. Instead you just say he had a 24.2 PER.
to say PER is overvalued, what you are really saying is that a player is contributing less or more than his traditional box score stats would indicate. You would have to explain why. but to say that PER is overvalued doesn't quite make sense.
also PER can't measure defense, and probably overvalues shot creation.
i guess a counter point would be that TP's individual stats would be higher if he had to carry a team on his own and didnt have the spurs system to take the pressure off himThis is an interesting perspective, anyone agree disagree?Tony Parker's Individual accomplishments really don't measure up at all.
If he didn't play with Timmy....we'd look at him like we view Chauncey Billups.
its just that all the other guys on my fantasy team played hard this week, KD even came back ahead of schedule to try and lead my team to a WWhat do you mean "how"?
how is brandon jennings shooting 13% this weekyou don't ask questions when it comes to players like that, players like Josh Smith etc.
or he has we just dont know.I never thought about that, it's a marvel that Wilt has no kids from an Era where condoms were not used frequently