- 26,898
- 383
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2005
I remember I wanted these so bad when they 1st dropped.
T-Mac 2 Retro is a go. Sort of.
- Thread in 'Other Brands' Thread starter Started by clutchshooter,
- Start date
- 26,898
- 383
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2005
I remember I wanted these so bad when they 1st dropped.
- 1,561
- 812
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2004
Pics as promised...
Some comparison shots between these and the OG's
Notice the difference in ankle collar height
Puremotion outsole
My T-Mac 2 family (always on the lookout for more
)
If you guys want some more angles, pics or a review let me know. I'll be unDSing these within the next few days. Suffice it to say that for $65 these are a must cop if you are a fan at all of the originals.
Some comparison shots between these and the OG's
Notice the difference in ankle collar height
Puremotion outsole
My T-Mac 2 family (always on the lookout for more
If you guys want some more angles, pics or a review let me know. I'll be unDSing these within the next few days. Suffice it to say that for $65 these are a must cop if you are a fan at all of the originals.
- 1,561
- 812
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2004
Pics as promised...
Some comparison shots between these and the OG's
Notice the difference in ankle collar height
Puremotion outsole
My T-Mac 2 family (always on the lookout for more
)
If you guys want some more angles, pics or a review let me know. I'll be unDSing these within the next few days. Suffice it to say that for $65 these are a must cop if you are a fan at all of the originals.
Some comparison shots between these and the OG's
Notice the difference in ankle collar height
Puremotion outsole
My T-Mac 2 family (always on the lookout for more
If you guys want some more angles, pics or a review let me know. I'll be unDSing these within the next few days. Suffice it to say that for $65 these are a must cop if you are a fan at all of the originals.
- 4,969
- 5,506
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2010
^thanks for the pics! when you wear them for the first time you should post some pics of what they look like on feet and let us know how they feel
- 4,969
- 5,506
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2010
^thanks for the pics! when you wear them for the first time you should post some pics of what they look like on feet and let us know how they feel
- 568
- 10
- Joined
- May 2, 2011
Never really liked these..
- 568
- 10
- Joined
- May 2, 2011
Never really liked these..
- 468
- 35
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2008
The removal of the torsion plate is almost as bad as the bootie getting taken out. It may be due to the Pure Motion sole. It's still very sad that Adidas tinkered with the shoe so much.
- 468
- 35
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2008
The removal of the torsion plate is almost as bad as the bootie getting taken out. It may be due to the Pure Motion sole. It's still very sad that Adidas tinkered with the shoe so much.
- 2,303
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2011
soles look horrible.
- 2,303
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2011
soles look horrible.
- 1,347
- 11
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2007
Thisss. Thx
- 1,347
- 11
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2007
Thisss. Thx
- 1,561
- 812
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2004
On feet pics as promised!
Quick review: After wearing these around most of the morning, I can say these are quite comfortable. Not as comfortable as the OG's though. With the removal of the inner bootie, there's less padding. As a result, while not as comfy, they are less bulky feeling and more lightweight. This is the first Adidas shoe I have with a Puremotion outsole, so I dont know much about that tech, but they feel lower to the ground and I think could have a great court feel. I have tile in my house and the outsole traction feels very solid as well. Overall I think these are worth it for $65 and when I get the chance to ball in an indoor court, I may bring these for a test wear.
Hope this helps some of you guys out!
Quick review: After wearing these around most of the morning, I can say these are quite comfortable. Not as comfortable as the OG's though. With the removal of the inner bootie, there's less padding. As a result, while not as comfy, they are less bulky feeling and more lightweight. This is the first Adidas shoe I have with a Puremotion outsole, so I dont know much about that tech, but they feel lower to the ground and I think could have a great court feel. I have tile in my house and the outsole traction feels very solid as well. Overall I think these are worth it for $65 and when I get the chance to ball in an indoor court, I may bring these for a test wear.
Hope this helps some of you guys out!
- 1,561
- 812
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2004
On feet pics as promised!
Quick review: After wearing these around most of the morning, I can say these are quite comfortable. Not as comfortable as the OG's though. With the removal of the inner bootie, there's less padding. As a result, while not as comfy, they are less bulky feeling and more lightweight. This is the first Adidas shoe I have with a Puremotion outsole, so I dont know much about that tech, but they feel lower to the ground and I think could have a great court feel. I have tile in my house and the outsole traction feels very solid as well. Overall I think these are worth it for $65 and when I get the chance to ball in an indoor court, I may bring these for a test wear.
Hope this helps some of you guys out!
Quick review: After wearing these around most of the morning, I can say these are quite comfortable. Not as comfortable as the OG's though. With the removal of the inner bootie, there's less padding. As a result, while not as comfy, they are less bulky feeling and more lightweight. This is the first Adidas shoe I have with a Puremotion outsole, so I dont know much about that tech, but they feel lower to the ground and I think could have a great court feel. I have tile in my house and the outsole traction feels very solid as well. Overall I think these are worth it for $65 and when I get the chance to ball in an indoor court, I may bring these for a test wear.
Hope this helps some of you guys out!
- 468
- 35
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2008
I wouldn't have doubted the Puremotion at all. They're quite comfortable and I wouldn't have tripped if they simply swapped the the sole. The bootie issue just floors me. Other than maybe thinking the Puremotion sole would compensate, I just don't understand the logic behind it. I'd probably still get them but not to play in, especially outdoors.
- 468
- 35
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2008
I wouldn't have doubted the Puremotion at all. They're quite comfortable and I wouldn't have tripped if they simply swapped the the sole. The bootie issue just floors me. Other than maybe thinking the Puremotion sole would compensate, I just don't understand the logic behind it. I'd probably still get them but not to play in, especially outdoors.
- 4,163
- 3,973
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2008
man! these look great! thanks for the pics fam. i cant wait till mine get here now after seeing these.
- 4,163
- 3,973
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2008
man! these look great! thanks for the pics fam. i cant wait till mine get here now after seeing these.
- 17,790
- 834
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2008
wow they changed them so much
- 17,790
- 834
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2008
wow they changed them so much
- 1,347
- 11
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2007
i like the patent toe and brighter blue. Considering copping OG's right now but the Returns are growing on me
- 1,347
- 11
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2007
i like the patent toe and brighter blue. Considering copping OG's right now but the Returns are growing on me
- 4,723
- 2,385
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2011
yo those are nice.. and they can be had for less then $65. Thanks for the pics and mini review! You can def see where material were cut out to save money compared to the og's
