Swarovski Concord XIs (Pic)

[guerrilla warfare]

 

[xavier23]

Wackkkkkkkkkk......

 

[i3asuncion]

Classic Killer...

 

[thakidfrombk]

DAMN SMH

 

[ajxv]

NO WAY N THEY WR IN GOOD CONDTN...................

 

[xclusyvwun]

This is a terrible waste of a good pair of retro XI's

 

[radrztj85]

I hope nobody buys these

 

[batusai]

plain 5tupid!!!!

 

[kingcrux31]

Ewww

 

[rockdeep]

Who knew you could de-value a shoe by adding Diamonds...

Didn't Reebok try this already.??? How did that work out?

 

[marcus0681]

Originally Posted by TaggPopperNJ

you can rock those with the A-Life "Limited edition" Michael Jackson glove...lol

Co-sign. that is even worse than the diamond encrusted question that they made a couple years ago. Someone somewhere is trying to start a trend of coveringanything in diamonds or precious stones and it's really not working. Damien Hirst's diamond skull is another bad example of that attempt to a trend.The should just stop

 

[trilbiejenna]

 

[tz85]

pure gay i will go nuts if jb ever thinks of selling something like that to us lol.

 

[edunpeal]

what an idiot

 

[xtrill]

way to ruin an amazing shoe

 

[23kidd]

 

[bananaboy2601]

He probably thought he was doing it too...

 

[mjshoefanatic]

Michael Jackson could have rocked these in '84 and everyone would have been on them like white on rice.

 

[xxhonchoxx]

 

[mike2389]

 

[kuruptedkickz]

looks like something out of the movie glitter

 

[phillyjayking]

 

[njstress03]

Originally Posted by mjshoefanatic

Michael Jackson could have rocked these in '84 and everyone would have been on them like white on rice.

 

[jordan4real]

Originally Posted by micheal623

Dumb.

 

[air marvin]

Those are hella UGLY!!

Maybe the seller is a hypebeast..

And yeah Michael Jackson PE's..