- Dec 13, 2004
- 74,858
- 62,753
No, he didn't have it in the film. Never played the game so I was confused.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
While I agree that I did like some of the wisecracking cause that's the way Spidey is supposed to be but the writers and Garfield over did it.I like the corny web-shooting poses Spider-Man is doing in all the promo pics for this sequel. If anything, you can definitely say they got spidey's whit right in ASM. The wisecracking Spider-Man that Garfield plays is already better than the crybaby Spider-Man that Tobey maguire played in the original trilogy
While I agree that I did like some of the wisecracking cause that's the way Spidey is supposed to be but the writers and Garfield over did it.
To the point where it made me feel like Peter deserved to get bullied cause he seemed like lil dickhead.
I'm getting tired of the Raimi trilogy slander just cause of SP3. We just gonna sit here and act like SP1 wasn't a good movie and SP2 wasn't a classic.
I swear I hate when it becomes cool to hate something. Same thing happened to the Matrix trilogy cause of that one scene in Reloaded. Bunch of people actin like high schoolers afraid of being unpopular.
Spidey is a wisecracking smartass, Peter is not. That's what I meant when I said they over did it.disagree it was perfect. This is what I missed this is the spiderman I knew.
"Oh no knives!!!" We need more of this every movie. Spiderman needs swag. toby was just a nerd turned hero.
this is a geek turned super hero.
While I agree that I did like some of the wisecracking cause that's the way Spidey is supposed to be but the writers and Garfield over did it.
To the point where it made me feel like Peter deserved to get bullied cause he seemed like lil dickhead.
I'm getting tired of the Raimi trilogy slander just cause of SP3. We just gonna sit here and act like SP1 wasn't a good movie and SP2 wasn't a classic.
I swear I hate when it becomes cool to hate something. Same thing happened to the Matrix trilogy cause of that one scene in Reloaded. Bunch of people actin like high schoolers afraid of being unpopular.
While I agree that I did like some of the wisecracking cause that's the way Spidey is supposed to be but the writers and Garfield over did it.
To the point where it made me feel like Peter deserved to get bullied cause he seemed like lil dickhead.
I'm getting tired of the Raimi trilogy slander just cause of SP3. We just gonna sit here and act like SP1 wasn't a good movie and SP2 wasn't a classic.
I swear I hate when it becomes cool to hate something. Same thing happened to the Matrix trilogy cause of that one scene in Reloaded. Bunch of people actin like high schoolers afraid of being unpopular.
More From Marc Webb On TASM 2; Says Fourth Film "Might Not Just Be A SPIDER-MAN Movie"
On What To Expect From A Fourth Movie And Introducing Multiple Characters In The Series:
"Well, I think this was conceived of as a trilogy so there was a defined architecture to the story we were telling and we had sort of a rough outline of what was going to happen. I think [for] the fourth movie, what we've discovered is there are so many ancillary characters, that have enormous, cinematic potential that there may be other ways to exploit those characters, in a way that is exciting and fun and worthwhile. It might not just be a Spider-Man movie.
"I think there's… You know, what was fun about the comics is that there's an entire sort of encyclopedia of characters and stories and histories and nuances and idiosyncrasies and off-shoots. I think that that is something that seems to be really successful and has a lot of potential so it's sort of, as yet, undefined, but intentionally so."
I smell....
More From Marc Webb On TASM 2; Says Fourth Film "Might Not Just Be A SPIDER-MAN Movie"
On What To Expect From A Fourth Movie And Introducing Multiple Characters In The Series:
"Well, I think this was conceived of as a trilogy so there was a defined architecture to the story we were telling and we had sort of a rough outline of what was going to happen. I think [for] the fourth movie, what we've discovered is there are so many ancillary characters, that have enormous, cinematic potential that there may be other ways to exploit those characters, in a way that is exciting and fun and worthwhile. It might not just be a Spider-Man movie.
"I think there's… You know, what was fun about the comics is that there's an entire sort of encyclopedia of characters and stories and histories and nuances and idiosyncrasies and off-shoots. I think that that is something that seems to be really successful and has a lot of potential so it's sort of, as yet, undefined, but intentionally so."
I smell....
whos that in ur avatarI would definitely be down for this. Then they could give Venom a whole movie to show his back story and have Spiderman make Cameos throughout the movie. Kind of how they do most of the movies but from the other perspective. This would limit the chance of another SM3 debacle because they dont know how to move Spiderman/Peter Parker's character along on screen so that you're interested in that story the whole time.
Truth.Sm2 aged great. Better the thor, captain America, iron man sequels, Any Fox film
That's the Ultimate version. All they gotta do here is kill Gwen, make Peter susceptible for the symbiote to bond with him and have it come from space. Simplest way is a meteorite crash at the beginning of the movie, that's taken right from the 90s cartoon when the symbiote came back to Earth the 2nd time (1st time had to do with astronauts going to the moon and bringing it back).How will they introduce it is my question seeing that Peter's father had a role in creating it.
Don't we all? I'm here for his wisecracks seeing as his defense mechanism for fear. Lol Pete's wisecracks vs Ultron LOLOLOLOLGarfield said he'd like to see Spidey with the Avengers.
Hugh Jackman also said he wants to see Wolverine in the Avengers..
I heard...