- 5,296
- 11,855
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2006
The new soccer mom thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
TROLOLOLOLOLOLL
WHY IS THIS DUDE NOT BANNED YET?.....
75 might've been too low.Over/under 75 pages?
I know, for some reason whenever I read his posts, I read it as if I was this person talking View media item 602606
but srs my stance on this situation is that the bickers were in the wrong for being dbags on the road and the driver was in the wrong for running over that guy. If I was in the situation I would have done what he did but I would have driven to a police station instead of the middle of traffic...
No need to break the law in the first place. You'll never get it man. You really think you're above the law. Another worthless member of society right here.
I.E. - when im out wit the homies or alone, im always down to fight whoever if it calls for it.
If im out alone with a chick and someone provokes me, im going to think twice bc of the womens safety in the situation, something we would all do.
Why?BTW I hate those stupid "Watchout for Motorcycle" bumper stickers.
She said weaving in and out of traffic, not oncoming traffic, he chose to put that particular gif up
IT COULD'VE BEEN AVOIDED IF THE BIKERS DIDN'T ACT LIKE THEY RULED THE ROAD THAT DAY. Why is the Range driver being held to a higher standard of cool-headedness than the bikers? Here's an idea bikers: don't be dickbag, Billy Badasses who act like you run **** on the road. Maybe taking that approach could've helped avoid this whole ordeal.
I'm not even arguing whether or not it was smart to not let the bikers pass. Could he have? Sure. Should he have? That's not really my call. Maybe he had somewhere he needed to be. Maybe he didn't know the unwritten rules of biking. All I'm saying is that the Range driver was well within his LEGAL rights to be where he was and to continue traveling on the road he was on. If the bikers were indeed stopping traffic, well, that's illegal. If the bikers impeded the Range driver's progress, well, that's illegal.
All that matters is that the Range was legally driving. The bikers allegedly were illegally stopping/slowing traffic for their group to pass. Also, note the unlawful imprisonment charge brought against buddy who brake checked. Do you not have the right to get out of a situation where you're unlawfully imprisoned?
Does anyone think this incident might force the NYPD and other law enforcement units to make some changes (not sure how) with how to respond to calls against dudes riding their bikes illegally?
You keep mentioning how they were driving. Who cares if they were driving illegally. He's not the cops. That's their job. He's supposed to be worried about his family, remember.
If you meet a obnoxious drunk person, do you engage them? Being publicly intoxicated is illegal and he might be unruly, but they are a threat, so you avoid them. One hundred men on motorcycles was a threat that should have been avoided instead of engaged. The police don't even engage them, because they are a threat.
IT COULD'VE BEEN AVOIDED IF THE BIKERS DIDN'T ACT LIKE THEY RULED THE ROAD THAT DAY. Why is the Range driver being held to a higher standard of cool-headedness than the bikers? Here's an idea bikers: don't be dickbag, Billy Badasses who act like you run **** on the road. Maybe taking that approach could've helped avoid this whole ordeal.
I'm not even arguing whether or not it was smart to not let the bikers pass. Could he have? Sure. Should he have? That's not really my call. Maybe he had somewhere he needed to be. Maybe he didn't know the unwritten rules of biking. All I'm saying is that the Range driver was well within his LEGAL rights to be where he was and to continue traveling on the road he was on. If the bikers were indeed stopping traffic, well, that's illegal. If the bikers impeded the Range driver's progress, well, that's illegal.
All that matters is that the Range was legally driving. The bikers allegedly were illegally stopping/slowing traffic for their group to pass. Also, note the unlawful imprisonment charge brought against buddy who brake checked. Do you not have the right to get out of a situation where you're unlawfully imprisoned?
You keep mentioning how they were driving. Who cares if they were driving illegally. He's not the cops. That's their job. He's supposed to be worried about his family, remember.
This is the crux of the whole ******g thing!!!
Magic - did their breaking of the law by how they were riding, affect other people on the road? Yes or no?
The wife confirmed this was weekend leisure drive... Bikers are dead wrong for the bullying they do when riding in packs, but why antagonize them? Everyone has a right to the road but these nothing to lose type ****** are the ones you don't go mano e mano with...
Really this was some when worlds collide ****... 99% v. 1%, one side looks down on BMW/RR drivers the other looks down on bikers... It's always hilarious to hear people projefct personalities on people based on the car they drive. It's so dumb
It all kinda reminds me of this movie
This is the crux of the whole ******g thing!!!
Magic - did their breaking of the law by how they were riding, affect other people on the road? Yes or no?
I never said it didn't. I said the situation should have been avoided, because there was nothing to gain. He wasn't going to win against 100 bikes. Both of them played a part in the events. At some point one person has to be the bigger and more mature person. Let them pass...be late to your destination. You have your family in the car. You can't pick and choose when you want to use that excuse.
On point.
Both parties should have just watched this movie to see how quick things can escalate.
Next thing you know, Lien's start-up is going to fold out of nowhere. Accounts frozen and errything.
his car was stopped completely two times.... both times the group attacked his car instead of riding ahead.