ayzee
Banned
- Sep 22, 2013
- 3,144
- 1,748
It doesn't apply to brains right?stunters save lives...make sure you got the organ donor sticker on your license and we good fambs
Sportbike Club terrorizes family in a Range Rover in Manhattan (vid)
- Status
createdestroy
Banned
- Apr 18, 2010
- 4,310
- 2,017
stunters save lives...make sure you got the organ donor sticker on your license and we good fambs
It doesn't apply to brains right?
1. you don't want a biker's brains
2. It's usually smeared across the asphalt/fender anyways
Proposition Joe
formerly rollinwithangel
- Oct 5, 2012
- 10,218
- 8,054
ayzee
Banned
- Sep 22, 2013
- 3,144
- 1,748
That was actually a knock at Rollin. Poor execution by me.
Just playing around Rollin...
createdestroy
Banned
- Apr 18, 2010
- 4,310
- 2,017
i know... i was playing along
antidope
Supporter
- Jan 2, 2012
- 63,526
- 68,127
- Dec 3, 2007
- 8,179
- 5,402
No dambs given.
He has his boy (the one that attempted to bike check the Range) to thank for his condition.
...
- Sep 17, 2006
- 9,635
- 6,436
- Jan 20, 2002
- 54,310
- 31,867
you think the guy in the range was looking for trouble the morning of that day. those bikers knew what they were doing by breaking the law. they have a history of not giving a damn when they are together
- Oct 9, 2007
- 3,511
- 418
notice how the conversation changed from
these innocent bikers just wanted to exchange insurance info and the driver fled to
the drive is going to lose all driving privileges and owe a lot of lawyer fees.
This is a clear desperate grasp at a "win" instead of admitting you were wrong.
Bikers had a history of being menacing, attacking innocent people, and disobeying traffic laws
these innocent bikers just wanted to exchange insurance info and the driver fled to
the drive is going to lose all driving privileges and owe a lot of lawyer fees.
This is a clear desperate grasp at a "win" instead of admitting you were wrong.
Bikers had a history of being menacing, attacking innocent people, and disobeying traffic laws
- Jul 26, 2013
- 571
- 201
So this basically happened...
- Apr 30, 2011
- 10,915
- 2,735
^ Why?
createdestroy
Banned
- Apr 18, 2010
- 4,310
- 2,017
bring back the wait period
- Apr 28, 2010
- 10,322
- 2,557
Didn't read most of pages 20-57.
Ninjahood is appreciatted and you can say he's like a founding father of Niketalk.
yes I know he hasn't been around since day one, but EVERY NTer knows who he is.
Ninjahood is appreciatted and you can say he's like a founding father of Niketalk.
yes I know he hasn't been around since day one, but EVERY NTer knows who he is.
- Jul 20, 2012
- 4,772
- 1,174
Settle down there.
Groupie
zx10kid
Banned
- Aug 7, 2012
- 101
- 11
Love the avatar
- May 15, 2003
- 56,662
- 65,623
This isn't the 1940's
- Mar 2, 2004
- 1,721
- 656
In all seriousness, maybe you should try to get your license...just because they didnt ask you for one three times. What were the reasons you got pulled over for?
- Jan 3, 2004
- 29,014
- 4,130
He joined like 3 months ago tho...
- Aug 12, 2013
- 10,749
- 14,781
Quote:
ninjahood has repeatedly failed to address valid criticisms against his argument despite them being quoted OVER and OVER again. The combination of arguments falling on deaf ears and ninjahood's childish last resort tactic of "say it to my face" led to personal attacks. Par for the course in a ninjahood thread.
What really struck a chord with me was remembering what ninjahood posted in the other thread about wanting a car purely for vanity and the first thing he was going to do when he gets his car is go smoke with his goons on the highway. I don't care if a man wants to spend his money on a car purely for vanity. We are men and we love automobiles so I understand that. Ya know what, I don't even really care if you smoke while driving because personally I don't find it impairing. If you're going somewhere and you wanna smoke to enjoy the ride a little bit it's whatever.
But, if you're only reason for being on the highway is to smoke in your car with your boys, or, stunt on your bike with your boys...see now I know why ninjahood is defending these fools on their bikes. They were on the highway for the same reason he wants to be, vanity purposes. If that's your reason for being on the highway just do it responsibly and if you endanger others be prepared to accept the consequences for your actions.
These bikers were not responsible at all. Forget the RR clipping a biker and leaving the scene of a crime which was a misdemeanor. That's what ninjahood is saying started this all right? No. The bikers were breaking traffic laws way before they even caught up to the RR. Holding up red lights, stopping cars, essentially acting as cross guards to their unorganized joy ride through the city. The erratic and wreckless driving of this group is what lead up to the offense of the RR accidentally hitting one of the bikers. You can not tell me that this man, with his family in the car, purposefully hit a biker riding with a mob.
Even if there was a jury full of ninjahood's for this case, the judge is entitled to take into account matters proved during the trial, or laid before him/her after verdict, as a guide to determining the quantum of punishment. I just don't see any kind of punishment coming down on Lien when the mob of bikers broke laws which placed him in unfavorable circumstances from the start and then the crime of recklessly endangering (class A misdemeanor) was also committed towards Lien and his family when the bikers made him pull over by brake checking and started engaging in conduct which created a substantial risk of serious physical injury to Lien and his family.
I'm trying to think like ninjahood and understand why he won't admit the bikers were at fault and the only way I could rationalize was to think back about what he posted about his reasons for using the highway. Just to stunt and be vain. The definition of vain is "producing no result; useless." So if you're breaking laws on the highway, not even using it as a means of transportation, just being useless and endangering others who are abiding by laws and probably have somewhere to go. AND you have the audacity to be upset when your wreckless behavior results in someone accidentally hitting you. AND you can't realize you were in the wrong to begin with. AND you go that extra step further and start bashing the RRs window and slashing tires trying to place the blame on him.
I don't see how this behavior can be justified by anyone but a fool.
I don't see how this thread has gone full circle...
ninjahood has repeatedly failed to address valid criticisms against his argument despite them being quoted OVER and OVER again. The combination of arguments falling on deaf ears and ninjahood's childish last resort tactic of "say it to my face" led to personal attacks. Par for the course in a ninjahood thread.
What really struck a chord with me was remembering what ninjahood posted in the other thread about wanting a car purely for vanity and the first thing he was going to do when he gets his car is go smoke with his goons on the highway. I don't care if a man wants to spend his money on a car purely for vanity. We are men and we love automobiles so I understand that. Ya know what, I don't even really care if you smoke while driving because personally I don't find it impairing. If you're going somewhere and you wanna smoke to enjoy the ride a little bit it's whatever.
But, if you're only reason for being on the highway is to smoke in your car with your boys, or, stunt on your bike with your boys...see now I know why ninjahood is defending these fools on their bikes. They were on the highway for the same reason he wants to be, vanity purposes. If that's your reason for being on the highway just do it responsibly and if you endanger others be prepared to accept the consequences for your actions.
These bikers were not responsible at all. Forget the RR clipping a biker and leaving the scene of a crime which was a misdemeanor. That's what ninjahood is saying started this all right? No. The bikers were breaking traffic laws way before they even caught up to the RR. Holding up red lights, stopping cars, essentially acting as cross guards to their unorganized joy ride through the city. The erratic and wreckless driving of this group is what lead up to the offense of the RR accidentally hitting one of the bikers. You can not tell me that this man, with his family in the car, purposefully hit a biker riding with a mob.
Even if there was a jury full of ninjahood's for this case, the judge is entitled to take into account matters proved during the trial, or laid before him/her after verdict, as a guide to determining the quantum of punishment. I just don't see any kind of punishment coming down on Lien when the mob of bikers broke laws which placed him in unfavorable circumstances from the start and then the crime of recklessly endangering (class A misdemeanor) was also committed towards Lien and his family when the bikers made him pull over by brake checking and started engaging in conduct which created a substantial risk of serious physical injury to Lien and his family.
I'm trying to think like ninjahood and understand why he won't admit the bikers were at fault and the only way I could rationalize was to think back about what he posted about his reasons for using the highway. Just to stunt and be vain. The definition of vain is "producing no result; useless." So if you're breaking laws on the highway, not even using it as a means of transportation, just being useless and endangering others who are abiding by laws and probably have somewhere to go. AND you have the audacity to be upset when your wreckless behavior results in someone accidentally hitting you. AND you can't realize you were in the wrong to begin with. AND you go that extra step further and start bashing the RRs window and slashing tires trying to place the blame on him.
I don't see how this behavior can be justified by anyone but a fool.
dahuhuhyah
Banned
- Aug 3, 2013
- 1,075
- 132
Why are you riding on the streets with no license bruh? Like don't you understand the danger your putting yourself and other drivers in? Respect your life and others bro, that mess is no joke. If you drive a Motorcycle I'm sure you could pass the driving portion and †he written probably ain't that hard. Just go get it man, you trippin
- Oct 22, 2004
- 5,409
- 923
- Jul 18, 2012
- 20,396
- 14,184
I agree. I think it's beyond stupid to ride a bike w/ no license or insurance. It's people like him that give bikers a bad name.
Also, Hen brought up a lot of good points in his post.
Personally, I LOVE a good debate. However, NH has shown repeatedly over the years that he's beyond ignorant with some of his opinions and viewpoints. Having a differing opinion is fine...taking it to the level in which he does, doesn't warrant any sort of appreciation for the man that he portrays himself as here on the board.
- Jul 18, 2012
- 20,396
- 14,184
- Status
