- 8,754
- 5,705
Edit: Not directed towards Tdogg2k, I'm just addressing the theory.here was my friend's insight
So instead of writing my essay about masculinity in American cinema I have decided to read parts of A Song of Ice and Fire again. And the more I read and think, the more I am inclined to believe that what I am saying right from the start is actually the truth. I keep talking about the bloodlines but I keep forgetting about the blood magic. So once I added the blood magic into the equation it all fell into its place. The funniest thing is that we have the layout for the Lands of Always Winter narrative but we take it as granted. Targaryens were once sheepherders who stumbled upon a dragon lair. Over time these dragons became their…not because they learned how to train them (anyone could do that) but because they have bound them to their blood, hence the words "Fire and Blood"…Therefore, dragons respond only to the blood of Valyria, i.e., Targaryen blood. And that's it. Bran sees the blood sacrifice in the weirwood by the means of green seeing, ability inherent to the Children of the Forest and not the First Men…which means that the First Men somehow acquired these abilities in the distant past, way before Targaryens stumbled upon the dragons. After the Long Night Starks were called The Kings of Winter. The Wall was built seemingly out of nowhere. And Winterfell was built. And WW were not killed. Instead, it is the blood magic that is the key here. I proposed that Bran the Builder was a demigod a product of First Men and White Walkers but I was wrong. He bound his blood (which will produce the Stark lineage) to the White Walkers. Same way Targaryens bound their blood to the dragons. It is the exact same thing just slightly different in the sense that one is Light (not good, just bright as summer) and one is Dark (not evil just grim as winter), i.e. ice and fire. Jon Snow is the product of both and his is The Song of Ice and Fire. Just like Daenerys had to step into the fire to hatch the dragons in a blood sacrifice, Jon will have to "die" in an ice sacrifice in order to bring the WW to him and unleash his abilities. As the only human being able to control both WW and dragons Jon will be the all powerful person in the world that will bring balance and order to it. Will he fight Daenerys or not depends solely on Daenerys and her ego. But if they do, she will perish, of that I am sure. So, to sum it up, Starks are bound to White Walkers by blood magic, they control the winter and ice and are considerably more immune to it, just like Targaryens are to fire. Neither is good or bad…This aspect depends solely on the person currently in charge. And Jon has the advantage over Daenerys here, due to many facts we have read or seen. This is what the show is currently trying to establish - dichotomy between these two characters.
This is an interesting theory, but there is some Reed Richards level stretching going on here. Let's start with the bold.
Where in that statement is the blood tie to WW? It says that the Starks inherited the green seeing ability from the children of the forest who in the story of the Long Night teamed up with The First Men to defeat the Others. Then the wall was built to keep The Others out. The entire story is about The First Men and Children working together, so I see a blood tie to The Children, but WW? How?
Next, Jon controlling dragons.
What dragons exactly is Jon going to control? Dany's? The dragon she blood sacrificed to hatch, then raised? He's simply just gonna take them? I guess this isn't a plot hole since I don't have evidence against it, but lets be honest it would be kinda lame if Dany's dragons simply turned on her.
If the "Ice dragon" is the case, then it's still one Ice Dragon vs 3 Fire Breathing Dragons. Don't see how Jon wins this one. One top of that the only weakness of The Others is dragon glass which some believe was made from dragons so Jon raising an army against an enemy that has ties to their only weakness and winning sounds crazy to me.
Third, prophecy
There are a lot of prophecy's through out the books and GRRM said some may come true and some may not, but one thing I know is there isn't a prophecy or mention of a person resurrecting to lead the WW against the realms of men. There is the Night's King, but Jon being the Night's King seems even less likely.
I'm not bashing the theory. Reading theories like this actually brings more excitement to the series IMO and makes me pay more attention every time I read the books.
Last edited: