Shooting Reported at Las Vegas Casino Hotel

getback said:
Who said anything about "disarming" citizens? :stoneface:
Click to expand...

....one can categorize this as "anything about "disarming" citizens"...

gry60 said:
Disarmament (preferably through buy back programs) + tighter restrictions on the kind of firearms that can be sold to the public (because the NRA and its gun making backers are just as responsible for the deterioration of the gun issue)
Click to expand...


...that's just in the last few pages...more examples if you go back further
...unless you were talking about folks in government and not posters in this thread
 
We really still having the same ‘it won’t be 1000% foolproof’ argument when people continue to explain that an iron clad law that always works is ridiculous.

It’s a straw man argument.
 
anybody else find it ridiculous that they are trying so hard to find out what made him do it even going as so far as to place the blame on his bank robbing father he never knew?

like come on man let that be any other race and they would say hes either with al qaeda or just a bat **** crazy thug

trying to dig so deep as to what the cause was like white america never did this type of **** before

this guy was just a bat **** crazy selfish loser.
 
Just read that the shooter killed himself before the cops get to the room? :smh:

Loser.
 
The gun debate spin is idiotic. Murder is already illegal. Clearly people like this don't care about the laws.
 
https://www.boston.com/news/politic...-shooting?s_campaign=bcom:socialflow:facebook

RI congressman drafts gun control bill after Vegas shooting
PROVIDENCE, R.I. (AP) — A Rhode Island congressman says he’s drafting a bill to prohibit devices that can enable a rifle to fire continuously, like an automatic weapon.

Authorities say the Las Vegas gunman had 23 guns with him at the hotel and 12 “bump stock” devices that can enable a rifle to fire continuously.

Democratic U.S. Rep. David Cicilline is asking his colleagues to co-sponsor legislation he’s working on that would prohibit the manufacture, possession, sale or transfer of devices to convert a semi-automatic weapon into the near equivalent of a fully automatic machine gun.

The Sunday night rampage by Stephen Craig Paddock killed at least 59 people and injured more than 500.
 
green rhino123 said:
....one can categorize this as "anything about "disarming" citizens"...




...that's just in the last few pages...more examples if you go back further
...unless you were talking about folks in government and not posters in this thread
Click to expand...

And I stand by my words. If mofos can't self regulate, somebody should.

Yesterday, someone brought up the upcoming vote on allowing the sale of armor piercing bullets.

Has anyone ever thought that if the police didn't have a high probability of facing heavily armed civilians, maybe, just maybe, they would be more accepting of patrolling with just a club, mace, a taser, and a whistle?

Want to solve the gun violence problem? De-escalate. That's the only thing the US hasn't tried yet.
 
noblekane said:
anybody else find it ridiculous that they are trying so hard to find out what made him do it even going as so far as to place the blame on his bank robbing father he never knew?

like come on man let that be any other race and they would say hes either with al qaeda or just a bat **** crazy thug

trying to dig so deep as to what the cause was like white america never did this type of **** before

this guy was just a bat **** crazy selfish loser.
Click to expand...
They gotta blame it on something so they can keep up the “white ppl are good n minorities/Muslims are bad” narrative

Any other type of person this you woulda been hearing terrorist, thug, or criminal before they even looked into backgrounds and facts
 
N if ppl are serious about gun control or preventing this from happening again , steps need to be taken before another event ...ppl only care after something happens then is back to business as usual , real change needs to happen when everything is “cool”
 
Last edited:
gry60 said:
And I stand by my words. If mofos can't self regulate, somebody should.

Yesterday, someone brought up the upcoming vote on allowing the sale of armor piercing bullets.

Has anyone ever thought that if the police didn't have a high probability of facing heavily armed civilians, maybe, just maybe, they would be more accepting of patrolling with just a club, mace, a taser, and a whistle?

Want to solve the gun violence problem? De-escalate. That's the only thing the US hasn't tried yet.
Click to expand...


Places where police shootings occur most often already have higher levels of gun control.

In America today police don't want to deescalate in urban environments. Guns banned or not we would still be getting shot and beat.

Civilians having armor piercing rounds is insane though
 
frshstunna said:
They gotta blame it on something so they can keep up the “white ppl are good n minorities/Muslims are bad” narrative

Any other type of person this you woulda been hearing terrorist, thug, or criminal before they even looked into backgrounds and facts
Click to expand...


LVPD Chief is now talking bout why no one ever said anything about his suspicious behaviors, pointing the finger at anyone who knew or interacted with him.

Didnt they already say he should no signs of going coo coo this way
 
Let's be honest, if new research comes back with recommendation that gun regulation will lower death of all kind, dudes will ignore it.

I can already spell the goal post move to "Welp, maybe we need to look into profiling mass shooter better".

I mean c'mon.....

ownership-vs-deaths630.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: MVP
kicks2024 said:
LVPD Chief is now talking bout why no one ever said anything about his suspicious behaviors, pointing the finger at anyone who knew or interacted with him.

Didnt they already say he should no signs of going *** *** this way
Click to expand...
fox news had the same rhetoric " see something, say something"....really tho ?
like how sway...
most of those close to " mass shooters" always say the same **** anyway...completely unexpected
 
SneakerProSr. said:
Places where police shootings occur most often already have higher levels of gun control.

In America today police don't want to deescalate in urban environments. Guns banned or not we would still be getting shot and beat.

Civilians having armor piercing rounds is insane though
Click to expand...

High levels of gun control but also high levels of illegal guns flooding in from other states into urban neighborhoods

We can't even attack that problem because the NRA buys off politicians to keep the ATF underfunded
 
RustyShackleford said:
Let's be honest, if new research comes back with recommendation that gun regulation will lower death of all kind, dudes will ignore it.

I can already spell the goal post move to "Welp, maybe we need to look into profiling mass shooter better".

I mean c'mon.....

ownership-vs-deaths630.png
Click to expand...


How much of this is suicide related? I know Alaska's at the top because their #1 suicide method is gun, and it makes them highest on the gun death list by percentage.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest News

View All News

Thread Gallery

View Full Gallery

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

Site contents may not be incorporated into AI training data or any other derivative works without prior express written consent.

Links to participating merchants may generate referral or affiliate commissions that help support our community. See our policies for details. NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom