- 10,915
- 2,735
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2011
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
What's a dude working for the organization doing scalping tickets
We gotta show out this week. Boogie gotta poop on that Davis/Asik frontline.we won the NBA TV fan night
2 games on national TV this week.
no, this shall not stand.@NikeTalker23 your sister wishes she was headed to Paris with me this weekend.
My sister passed away in a car accident 2 years ago, nice joke though.
http://www.nba.com/kings/news/kings-file-game-protest
hopefully we get a final ruling before Dec. 2nd though :x
Instances in NBA history when the protest of a game has been granted:
Matchup: Heat at Hawks
Date: Dec. 19, 2007
Scenario: The Heat protested because, with 51.9 seconds remaining in OT, the Hawks’ scoring table personnel incorrectly disqualified Miami’s Shaquille O’Neal, asserting that a foul committed by O’Neal was his sixth of the game (it was only his fifth). Misstep: The Hawks’ official scorer mistakenly attributed to O’Neal a foul at 3:24 remaining in the fourth quarter that was actually called against the Heat’s Udonis Haslem.
Ruling: The protest will result is the ending of the game being replayed.
Matchup: Lakers at Spurs
Date: Nov. 30, 1982
Scenario: The Spurs claimed misapplication of the lane violation rule with 3 seconds left.
Ruling: Protest was upheld on grounds that the error clearly affected the outcome of the game.
Matchup: Nets at 76ers
Date: Nov. 8, 1978
Scenario: Nets claimed misapplication of technical foul rule in second quarter resulting in four unwarranted free throws and ejection of their head coach.
Ruling: Protest upheld on grounds that the error clearly affected the outcome of the game.
Matchup: Celtics at Lakers
Date: Dec. 8, 1954
Scenario: The Celtics claimed that the final two free throws by Vern Mikkelsen were not valid because they came on a foul committed after the game ended.
Ruling: Commissioner Maurice Podoloff upheld the referee’s ruling.
Per release, Sacramento will host rounds 1 and 2 of the NCAA Tournament in their new building starting in 2017.
— James Ham (@James_Ham) November 17, 2014
My thinking as well. If you can't overturn this one, what the hell can you overturn....I hate to sound whiny here but it was clearly tipped. If they don't reverse the decision, why do they have rules if they don't abide by them?
And there's really no way they can say the ball was not tipped by Hollins
Because they didn't give a crap. They also had the video paused a couple frames AFTER Hollins touched the ball, trying to see if it touched his fingers, when the ball had actually already touched the side of his palmAnd there's really no way they can say the ball was not tipped by Hollinsthey did when they made the call the night of the game though