- 15,978
- 32,024
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2013
I’m not sure what you mean. I’m referring to others who have second thoughts based on wether or not they used 3M or not.Didn't they just get bought?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I’m not sure what you mean. I’m referring to others who have second thoughts based on wether or not they used 3M or not.Didn't they just get bought?
I see what you mean, I was saying Reebok has now switched ownership so hopefully future iterations will be more uniform.I’m not sure what you mean. I’m referring to others who have second thoughts based on wether or not they used 3M or not.
thanks for saving me the purchase and return.Welp, i hate to tell you both wings, back panel and top of the tongue. But not on the midsole
That's what Nightwing's (YouTuber) review also said. He got them last year and did a review on them.The finals pair came in and the leather is nice and soft. Compared to the Georgetowns and even the Philly pair I copped, these have the best quality by far.
I see what you mean, I was saying Reebok has now switched ownership so hopefully future iterations will be more uniform.
I wouldn't count on any Reebok foam right now as comfortable. the I-Pak system they have on the Iversons is mediocre at best. the only good ones that Reebok have imo are the DMX 10s.So I've been hearing reports that these are at least comfortable compared to the 2012/2013 pair in terms of cushioning; is this true? I have the Georgetowns and those don't feel like they have anything in them, not even DMX Foam. The only good DMX Foam I've felt was in the Answer X and Answer XII, if they felt like those then I can cop multiple pairs.
Yeah the quality is waaaaay better than any answer retro I’ve purchased prior. Which we got real DMX in them, but that would be asking a lot lol
this is the reason why I always hesitate to buy the Iversons. Reebok charges too much on the name but puts less on the product. funny thing is that they put all that DMX tech on their lifestyle and runner models for cheap. if only Reebok put all that back in, I would have gotten a few more pairs of Iversons.I would agree if they didn’t put DMX in other shoes (including the Answer 1, Answer 5 retros and other recently released ones). They put DMX in those with really no hype or instagram announcements, but they hype these up and put nothing in them. It’s not like they don’t have it or can’t, they’re just maximizing profit and that’s just wrong to me.
I get it that they’re releasing them as a lifestyle shoe but don’t charge the equivalent in price (from the OG days). Just drop them back down to like $130 like they used to be, or charge more and put the dang tech in. I’d easily pay $200 for these for the real DMX, double cop at that with no questions asked…
this is the reason why I always hesitate to buy the Iversons. Reebok charges too much on the name but puts less on the product. funny thing is that they put all that DMX tech on their lifestyle and runner models for cheap. if only Reebok put all that back in, I would have gotten a few more pairs of Iversons.
I love the look of the Iversons but I can't really ball in them. tried them once but I felt my knees would give in. used them for an 8 hr work shift and my legs and knees were worn out as hell. I have returned the Answer 4.5 sleeve since they were so hard to walked on. the Legacies were decent but still underwhelming. only the DMX 10s had me smiling.As much as I love these I’m probably sending them back to Finishline. Every time I put them on and feel nothing it just negates the look of them. I have a case number with Reebok to discuss this, it’s getting beyond ridiculous to me at this point and it really pisses me off because this is literally THE BEST SHOE of all time to me.
Answer IV Game 5 is being released today.