- Feb 10, 2008
- 6,998
- 2,790
Packer shoes has about half of the sizes for $100
Last edited:
Reebok Answer 1 returning in May 24, 2013. Retail $150
- Thread in 'Other Brands' Thread starter Started by fdub,
- Start date
- Mar 22, 2013
- 529
- 201
I hope these come back too, I didnt get a chance to get these but I did get the http://www.complex.com/sneakers/201...ersons-signature-reeboks/reebok-the-answer-ii
- Jun 18, 2001
- 5,019
- 2,820
Uggggh the answer 2?
After the question and then the answer 1,
God those were trash. Like a jb shoe to a numbered jordan.
Theyjust felt cheap n looked it too. Granted the first two shoes in the iverson line were classics and deserved the retro.
The iv? Not too bad, but everyone had em cuz they were cheap and had mad colors. No shoe after the iv deserves a retro haha
After the question and then the answer 1,
God those were trash. Like a jb shoe to a numbered jordan.
Theyjust felt cheap n looked it too. Granted the first two shoes in the iverson line were classics and deserved the retro.
The iv? Not too bad, but everyone had em cuz they were cheap and had mad colors. No shoe after the iv deserves a retro haha
Last edited:
- Feb 29, 2000
- 88,758
- 47,965
The questions and answer 1- 4 are straight classics.
The 2 was fire in the first two colorways and design wise. was superior to the answer 1. The unique lacing, although did nothing performance wise, looked pretty cool.
The answer V was where they lost it. Although they were ok
and on another note the answer vii had the cheapest paper thin leather I have EVER wore in my life. Worse than the nike stuff of today.
The 2 was fire in the first two colorways and design wise. was superior to the answer 1. The unique lacing, although did nothing performance wise, looked pretty cool.
The answer V was where they lost it. Although they were ok
and on another note the answer vii had the cheapest paper thin leather I have EVER wore in my life. Worse than the nike stuff of today.
Ricky D
formerly centex hogg
- Mar 3, 2013
- 19,438
- 14,210
looking to cop for under retail, anybody know where i can get a pair size 10.5?
- Oct 23, 2012
- 1,715
- 574
Packer Shoes has these for 100 (some sizes) also people say these fit big, so u maybe have to size down .5 or a full size
http://packer-shoes.myshopify.com/products/reebok-answer-dmx-10
- Aug 15, 2012
- 17
- 11
How do these compare in sizing to the retro XIIIs?
I'm 10.5 in the XIIIs, should I go down to a 10 for the Answers 1s?
I'm 10.5 in the XIIIs, should I go down to a 10 for the Answers 1s?
- Sep 16, 2010
- 5,186
- 7,409
Yes because these run really big.. I wear a size 11 in 90 percent of my shoes and in these, I had to get a 10.5...
- Jan 18, 2013
- 748
- 83
i personally thought the quality wasn't too bad. Wasn't horrible, but wasn't the best. regardless I was picking up this shoe no matter what. DMX cushioning or not. This shoe has a lot of memories for me. Having the OG version back when they dropped, living in the philly area and watching AI play majority of his career there, these were a must cop for me. I should of waited for the price drop below $100 but oh well. Got them for $20 below retail. I love how these aren't a high top and just a nice mid top. I like these better than the Answer 4's. Answer 1's have always and will be a classic to me. Especially this gold / black colorway.
- Apr 1, 2008
- 13,529
- 9,454
Answer IIIs are so fire. I have this colorway and the blue ones.
I would love to see the Gtowns retro... by far my favorite colorway for this shoe
- Dec 14, 2004
- 60,034
- 50,948
3s are money. I had the white/black pair when they came out. I always wanted the Georgetown color. I found some white/blue and all black in the outlets back in 05-06. I was dumb hyped, bought them instantly.
- Apr 1, 2008
- 13,529
- 9,454
My best friend in jr highl had the OG white/blacks. I actually liked retro versions better than the OGs because they had colored toecaps compared to the solid white caps on the OGs.
Id love to see these retro with DMX. The last reissue in 2006/07 still had real DMX, but I doubt well see it next time around.
- May 2, 2012
- 27,111
- 14,584
Does packer charge for shipping
- Mar 25, 2013
- 5,259
- 2,275
Answer I up on Sneaker Politics for under $100 using code "Goodbye". Pretty good sizes too.
http://www.sneakerpolitics.com/shop/index.php?l=product_detail&p=1368
http://www.sneakerpolitics.com/shop/index.php?l=product_detail&p=1368
- Jun 13, 2013
- 26
- 11
A must cop
- Dec 21, 2002
- 28,114
- 2,665
damn only 9 and 12
- Mar 25, 2013
- 5,259
- 2,275
^Yea, unfortunately Kicks Deals caught wind of it after I posted it on here. I'll be on the lookout for others.
- Feb 11, 2008
- 19,658
- 12,688
- Dec 21, 2002
- 28,114
- 2,665
yea they been sold out of my size since last week, it shows all sizes, but when you try to add to cart it tells you "Sold Out"
- Aug 26, 2004
- 844
- 634
I dont get how reebok can put moving air DMX in the dmx skys but not in the answer retros
Reebok DMX Sky Ridiculous Cushioning from BlogSport on Vimeo.
Reebok DMX Sky Ridiculous Cushioning from BlogSport on Vimeo.
- Aug 10, 2012
- 617
- 397
People are buying the DMX sky shoes, whereas they don't know if people will buy the retros, so they skimp out on them as a "safe strategy". Funny thing is, they're still riding shelves lol
- Jan 3, 2013
- 9
- 10
love these kicks glad they came back out
- Aug 14, 2008
- 1,148
- 17
- Jan 21, 2013
- 183
- 25
If I'm a little bigger than a 9.5, should I get a 9 or 9.5?
- Aug 15, 2012
- 17
- 11
I'm wondering what size I should get too. I'm a 10.5 in the Jordan Retro 12s and 13s. Should I grab a 10 in these or go even lower?
Anybody who owns both please let me know!
Anybody who owns both please let me know!
Last edited:
