- 637
- 46
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2012
Bao getting picked apart
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
wait really? How come this is the first time I'm hearing this? News media must be suppressing this info!!!!GZ dads a judge his mama was a judge too
There's no way the man will be convicted
Both his parents worked for the court system he will walk easily
You have to be illiterate to think that's not a factor
wait really? How come this is the first time I'm hearing this? News media must be suppressing this info!!!!
damnwait really? How come this is the first time I'm hearing this? News media must be suppressing this info!!!!
Either that
or you're going deaf could be wax build up
Get you some cotton balls put some sweet oil on it
Stick'em in both ears for a few days you'll be ii8
She could be, or maybe just maybe the defense team doesn't have their act together.This Judge is terribly biased.
This Judge is terribly biased. If Zimmy gets convicted he has alot of grounds for new trial.
for the 51st time his dad was never a judge. Never ever everGZ dads a judge his mama was a judge too
There's no way the man will be convicted
Both his parents worked for the court system he will walk easily
You have to be illiterate to think that's not a factor
YES but the thing is the law doesnt state you can stalk someone, chase them down, scare them and when you approach the person they whop you rbutt out of shear fear and you shoot.I kind've think that as well. But the thing about the stand your ground law, it's basically how you interpret what it means. Imo, it's saying that if I'm out hanging and someone attacks me for no reason, then I have the right to fight back and not have to retreat. It's not saying that I can instigate a conflict then use deadly force once I start getting beat. Imo It's basically how the jury interprets the meaning of the law. I know that I can definitely be in TM's situation because if someone is following me late at night, then start chasing after me once I start running, I most likely will attack that person as well.
Because it is not true and even GZ dad stated this is not truewait really? How come this is the first time I'm hearing this? News media must be suppressing this info!!!!
for the 51st time his dad was never a judge. Never ever ever
and when GZ is convicted, dont you go hiding under a table because you will be clowned in this same thread so be prepared for shear embrassament and clowning troll
There is no evidence to contradict Zimmerman's claim that Martin confronted him while he was walking back to his vehicle. It will never be proven that Zimmerman confronted Martin or tried to detain him, that is your imagination talking. Zimmerman was not given a police order, the dispatcher simply suggested that he not follow martin, and he agreed and complied. The dispatcher testified on the stand that they are not allowed to give orders for liability reasons.quick question...
is there ANY body on George Zimmerman's side?
seems like everybody believes he was wrong ...
for the 51st time his dad was never a judge. Never ever ever
and when GZ is convicted, dont you go hiding under a table because you will be clowned in this same thread so be prepared for shear embrassament and clowning troll
YES but the thing is the law doesnt state you can stalk someone, chase them down, scare them and when you approach the person they whop you rbutt out of shear fear and you shoot.
That is not self defense.
Self defense if im minding my own business and my life get threatend. GZ was not minding his own biz
That is the whole issue at hand now with this trial. All they are trying to prove that GZ stalked him and caused the issue
You cant go around picking fights then get your butt beat to a pulp and shoot back kill someone and claim self defense..It dont work that way
There is no evidence to contradict Zimmerman's claim that Martin confronted him while he was walking back to his vehicle. It will never be proven that Zimmerman confronted Martin or tried to detain him, that is your imagination talking. Zimmerman was not given a police order, the dispatcher simply suggested that he not follow martin, and he agreed and complied. The dispatcher testified on the stand that they are not allowed to give orders for liability reasons.
If Zimmerman was provably the aggressor, this would be a very different case. He could still potentially show that he acted in justified self defense under Florida law, but his burden would be harder to meet. That isn't the case here though, there is no significant evidence that Zimmerman was the aggressor, and Zimmerman claims Martin was the aggressor, and the injuries, location and timing of the confrontation, seem to support his story.
According to the last person to speak to Martin, he was already back at his house, which, when considering the location of the struggle, would mean he had to double back to confront Zimmerman.
There's nothing to contradict Zimmerman's story that he walked straight at the T-intersection and then back towards his car. You might not believe him, but there isn't any evidence to contradict it.
The kicker is that even if Zimmerman had followed Martin, wanted to confront Martin, and actually confronted him, that is not illegal. Poor judgement perhaps, but not illegal. What is illegal is physically assaulting someone, and all the evidence points to Zimmerman being assaulted by Martin. Nothing points to the contrary.
Thank you, for speaking some pretty basic foundation of why this case is going the way it's going.
I really don't understand, as a minority myself, how some of you still are trying to make this a race thing. There's zero, ZERO proof, of anything related to race. America, right?
Thank you, for speaking some pretty basic foundation of why this case is going the way it's going.
I really don't understand, as a minority myself, how some of you still are trying to make this a race thing. There's zero, ZERO proof, of anything related to race. America, right?
hahahah naw your wrong . A magistrate is NOT a judge nor do they have judical powers and also his dad only work that low level spot from 2001-2006.. You really think he have connects, get out of hereFalse... GZ's dad is a retired judge. Not that it matters... but your statement is in fact false. His dad served as a full time magistrate for the Supreme Court of Virginia from 2000-2006. Not sure what or where you are getting your info from
He followed him and considered him a suspect because he was black (If not please explain why he did). There is nothing suspicious about walking outside in the rain to any normal individual. People do it all the time... If you believe he would have reacted the same way to a white man in a suit or polo then you are delusional.
EDIT: In the real world common sense does not go outside of the window just because there isn't any "proof". It's clear that Zimmerman sized up Trayvon and due to his appearance felt he was a "punk" and a "suspect" It is clear he appeared to Zimmerman as a black male with a hoodie. The implications are very clear.