- 241
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2008
Will we ever see White/Infrared VI?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by Xnyles
Will we ever see White/Infrared VI?
With that being said, i assume that you haven't bought a pair of retro J's in probably 6-7 years. Most jordan's since 2003 have beenfar inferior to the Originals....Originally Posted by blco02
Originally Posted by SLP Product
The VI's never used 3m.
The perforations along the ankle had some foil or some reflecting material behind it.
"Some reflecting material". How do you know that it wasn't 3M?
Ok, well whatever material it was, if these aren't exactly like the og's then I'm not interested. I only want the shoes that MJ wore and that I couldn't afford as a kid. Not a half-assed replica.
Originally Posted by Souljaman22
Originally Posted by 2396Bulls
Originally Posted by Souljaman22
3m was only in the preforations right?Originally Posted by blco02
If the Black VI's don't have 3m in the upper like the og's, I'm not interested.
and i think the 3m on them was ugly and im glad it was removed and this is a diff colorway from the ogs anyway
How is the 3m ugly? you can only see it when the light is on it just right. who cares if its not an og color? the 3m is still a detail of that shoe. we get the crap jb puts out because people like you gobble up anything they put out no matter how far removed from the og a shoe is. yikes.
you just made no sense
i stated my opinion that i didnt like the 3m on the og infrareds
the only VI ever to have 3m was the og black/infrared VI am i right?
THESE ARE NOT INFRAREDS SO ITS NOT AN OG COLORWAY SO ITS NOT MISSING THE 3M BECAUSE IT NEVER HAD IT
understand? lmao at you thinkin your dropping knowledge
sorry for liking a new release
i was thinking about picking up the mettalic 1 retros is that okay or should i pass because the ogs didnt have tumbled leather?
so the 3m or whatever it is was on every coloraway?Originally Posted by 2396Bulls
Originally Posted by Souljaman22
Originally Posted by 2396Bulls
Originally Posted by Souljaman22
3m was only in the preforations right?Originally Posted by blco02
If the Black VI's don't have 3m in the upper like the og's, I'm not interested.
and i think the 3m on them was ugly and im glad it was removed and this is a diff colorway from the ogs anyway
How is the 3m ugly? you can only see it when the light is on it just right. who cares if its not an og color? the 3m is still a detail of that shoe. we get the crap jb puts out because people like you gobble up anything they put out no matter how far removed from the og a shoe is. yikes.
you just made no sense
i stated my opinion that i didnt like the 3m on the og infrareds
the only VI ever to have 3m was the og black/infrared VI am i right?
THESE ARE NOT INFRAREDS SO ITS NOT AN OG COLORWAY SO ITS NOT MISSING THE 3M BECAUSE IT NEVER HAD IT
understand? lmao at you thinkin your dropping knowledge
sorry for liking a new release
i was thinking about picking up the mettalic 1 retros is that okay or should i pass because the ogs didnt have tumbled leather?
I stand corrected I guess. I know, you KNOW FOR SURE, that the material was 3m. Without a doubt, 3m. It couldn't have been anything else. Not another material? Whatever you say. By the way, the og infrared IV's were not the only shoes to have the "3m" behind the perforations. You forgot to mention og carmines, og maroons, og white/infrareds, and og sport blues. So, NO you are not right. Also, I was making a point about the current status of Brand Jordan. If you missed it in my post: sorry, thats on you. But thanks for your knowledge of and I'm paraphrasing "these are not an og color so they dont have the 3m". Thanks, really, thanks. Didn't know black/VARSITY RED was a new color and not an og. Didn't know at all. Had no idea. Let me guess, your witty reply will be to tell me that VARSITY RED is a shade of red, right? And again, I didn't say anywhere in my post you couldn't buy any j's you wanted, now did I? No, didn't think so. But since you CORRECTED me, I'll reiterate my point from my original post and simplify it for you so the idea can't be missed: JB makes money off of retros even though they are not like the original. Again, I stand corrected. I am completely and utterly corrected. So corrected am I, I should just change my first and last name to: CORRECTED. Thanks. Going to change my niketalk name to Corrected as well. Nothing but Corrected, Corrected, Corrected. Correct? Lest I forget, Im sure you're going to say in your complexly, vastly, intelligent reply something like "I never used the word correct". Oh! If I misspelled a word or have some small grammar mistake, I'm sure you won't point that out either, right? Again, Im Corrected, right?
Originally Posted by ninjahood
they making a mistake by darking da infared into varsity red........but we're so starved for VI's that imma cop em anywayz....
Originally Posted by Souljaman22
so the 3m or whatever it is was on every coloraway?Originally Posted by 2396Bulls
Originally Posted by Souljaman22
Originally Posted by 2396Bulls
Originally Posted by Souljaman22
3m was only in the preforations right?Originally Posted by blco02
If the Black VI's don't have 3m in the upper like the og's, I'm not interested.
and i think the 3m on them was ugly and im glad it was removed and this is a diff colorway from the ogs anyway
How is the 3m ugly? you can only see it when the light is on it just right. who cares if its not an og color? the 3m is still a detail of that shoe. we get the crap jb puts out because people like you gobble up anything they put out no matter how far removed from the og a shoe is. yikes.
you just made no sense
i stated my opinion that i didnt like the 3m on the og infrareds
the only VI ever to have 3m was the og black/infrared VI am i right?
THESE ARE NOT INFRAREDS SO ITS NOT AN OG COLORWAY SO ITS NOT MISSING THE 3M BECAUSE IT NEVER HAD IT
understand? lmao at you thinkin your dropping knowledge
sorry for liking a new release
i was thinking about picking up the mettalic 1 retros is that okay or should i pass because the ogs didnt have tumbled leather?
I stand corrected I guess. I know, you KNOW FOR SURE, that the material was 3m. Without a doubt, 3m. It couldn't have been anything else. Not another material? Whatever you say. By the way, the og infrared IV's were not the only shoes to have the "3m" behind the perforations. You forgot to mention og carmines, og maroons, og white/infrareds, and og sport blues. So, NO you are not right. Also, I was making a point about the current status of Brand Jordan. If you missed it in my post: sorry, thats on you. But thanks for your knowledge of and I'm paraphrasing "these are not an og color so they dont have the 3m". Thanks, really, thanks. Didn't know black/VARSITY RED was a new color and not an og. Didn't know at all. Had no idea. Let me guess, your witty reply will be to tell me that VARSITY RED is a shade of red, right? And again, I didn't say anywhere in my post you couldn't buy any j's you wanted, now did I? No, didn't think so. But since you CORRECTED me, I'll reiterate my point from my original post and simplify it for you so the idea can't be missed: JB makes money off of retros even though they are not like the original. Again, I stand corrected. I am completely and utterly corrected. So corrected am I, I should just change my first and last name to: CORRECTED. Thanks. Going to change my niketalk name to Corrected as well. Nothing but Corrected, Corrected, Corrected. Correct? Lest I forget, Im sure you're going to say in your complexly, vastly, intelligent reply something like "I never used the word correct". Oh! If I misspelled a word or have some small grammar mistake, I'm sure you won't point that out either, right? Again, Im Corrected, right?
can i see pics please?
if it was on every colorway then i apoligize because i was wrong
if it was on every og colorway then it is part of the shoe and that would be like leaving the heeltab off of the retros
my bad man but i still think they look better without the 3mand i dont just gobble up anything JB releases i just like these kicks
again sorry
Originally Posted by blackiceblaze
With that being said, i assume that you haven't bought a pair of retro J's in probably 6-7 years. Most jordan's since 2003 have been far inferior to the Originals....Originally Posted by blco02
Originally Posted by SLP Product
The VI's never used 3m.
The perforations along the ankle had some foil or some reflecting material behind it.
"Some reflecting material". How do you know that it wasn't 3M?
Ok, well whatever material it was, if these aren't exactly like the og's then I'm not interested. I only want the shoes that MJ wore and that I couldn't afford as a kid. Not a half-assed replica.