- 568
- 131
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2003
I've been waiting for these to drop but the SAs @ LV don't know #@#$ here. I know a high version of these is coming also but i need to know when theydrop, anyone?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Im guessing this year. I got the on sale a saks. They are the womens version tho. I got the last biggest they had.Originally Posted by BgL2687
houstonsnk when did those Acups come out? I need a pair for the summer.
Originally Posted by RFX45
^^^ Those lows has been out and isn't selling too well.
Your store should be able to order them for from another store, even ship it to your house for free.
Not sure about the high top version though.
What the "gang rape" advertisement?Originally Posted by SDS45
Originally Posted by RFX45
^^^ Those lows has been out and isn't selling too well.
Your store should be able to order them for from another store, even ship it to your house for free.
Not sure about the high top version though.
Thanks, good to know they're out but if the toronto store doesn't have it i doubt any other LV in Canada would. Hopefully they're late and will eventually release here.
Also Gucci is marking down prices again today (friday), store might be worth hitting up and those D&G are nice but i would never wear the brand because of their advertisements
Yeah people can say what they want about them being somewhat played out but definitely one of the most comfortable casual sneakers made by anyhigh end brand.Originally Posted by KrisC
I love Pradas.
Originally Posted by Kingtre
same
Originally Posted by SDS45
^ more like the men in a locker room, guys looking at naked guy on the floor and the two guys version of that banned puma bj one. Seams like the brand is more geared towards a certain "lifestyle". I'm not saying thats wrong, just not my thing.....
Originally Posted by icebergslm
Originally Posted by SDS45
^ more like the men in a locker room, guys looking at naked guy on the floor and the two guys version of that banned puma bj one. Seams like the brand is more geared towards a certain "lifestyle". I'm not saying thats wrong, just not my thing.....
Honestly all this high end fashion is geared towards rich housewives and gay men. Just look at how the majority of the men's clothes fit, and the men who model them. The other thing is 90% of the male designers are gay, D&G is just one company who incorporates that into their ads trying to be edgy and provocative. I thought you were saying you don't wear it because the ads are offensive to you morally like that gang rape ad, but if your reason for not wearing it is because the ads are sometimes gay themed, you might as well not wear any of the high-end male designed brands because in essence, they all are.
Originally Posted by RFX45
Originally Posted by icebergslm
Originally Posted by SDS45
^ more like the men in a locker room, guys looking at naked guy on the floor and the two guys version of that banned puma bj one. Seams like the brand is more geared towards a certain "lifestyle". I'm not saying thats wrong, just not my thing.....
Honestly all this high end fashion is geared towards rich housewives and gay men. Just look at how the majority of the men's clothes fit, and the men who model them. The other thing is 90% of the male designers are gay, D&G is just one company who incorporates that into their ads trying to be edgy and provocative. I thought you were saying you don't wear it because the ads are offensive to you morally like that gang rape ad, but if your reason for not wearing it is because the ads are sometimes gay themed, you might as well not wear any of the high-end male designed brands because in essence, they all are.
Some of those concepts are reaching. Do you think only gay people wear fitting clothes? The runway models aren't even as bad as some skinny pants out there. And just because the models are skinny doesn't make them or the clothes for gay people. The logic of designers being gay and how the clothes fit and the model that wears them makes them suited or made for gay people is ridiculous.
I agree that the advertisement should not affect how you like the clothes/shoes but I can understand how people could feel about it and if they decide to stay away from that brand, then not a problem at all.
icebergslm wrote:
It's common sense look who's designing the clothing, and who they're designing it for and be honest with yourself.
Again, generalizing who the clothes are made for just because it is made by a certain group.
Common sense has nothing to do with it, you can't judge how these clothes look in the runway and who designed them.
Runway models has always looked that way for decades now and I don't see it going away.
Honestly, Gucci and LV has been designing clothes for the supposedly Urban Scene for a while now and they have boldly advertised it too.
(I'm not sure why the texts are bold after the qoute)
Originally Posted by RFX45
^^^ I think we did agree with your point but you did somewhat generalize by simply saying; "Honestly all this high end fashion is geared towards rich housewives and gay men. Just look at how the majority of the men's clothes fit, and the men who model them. The other thing is 90% of the male designers are gay..."
You emphasize that and boldly said their clothes are for gay men.
As for the clothes you described, you need to get out of NT because there are plenty of people clamoring for short shorts and skin tight v neck sweaters. Visit Style Forum at times, those looks are considered as a good and daring and confident.
There is no common sense, you don't need to wear clothes designed by straight men. Hell that would limit our fashion horizon to Ecko, Sean John, LRG, etc... even some designers from those brands are probably gay too, they just have a different style. I don't think designers designs their clothes and say, "this is perfect for this dude I want to date."
icebergslm wrote:
It's common sense look who's designing the clothing, and who they're designing it for and be honest with yourself.
Originally Posted by RFX45
^^^ I think we did agree with your point but you did somewhat generalize by simply saying; "Honestly all this high end fashion is geared towards rich housewives and gay men. Just look at how the majority of the men's clothes fit, and the men who model them. The other thing is 90% of the male designers are gay..."
You emphasize that and boldly said their clothes are for gay men.
As for the clothes you described, you need to get out of NT because there are plenty of people clamoring for short shorts and skin tight v neck sweaters. Visit Style Forum at times, those looks are considered as a good and daring and confident.
There is no common sense, you don't need to wear clothes designed by straight men. Hell that would limit our fashion horizon to Ecko, Sean John, LRG, etc... even some designers from those brands are probably gay too, they just have a different style. I don't think designers designs their clothes and say, "this is perfect for this dude I want to date."
icebergslm wrote:
It's common sense look who's designing the clothing, and who they're designing it for and be honest with yourself.
If you think that my point is that we need to wear clothes designed by straight men, then you really are missing my point. And no that was not a generalization. I said that 90% of high end male fashion designers are gay which is exaggerated, but true. I said that these designer design clothes geared mostly towards rich housewives and gay men which is also true. When I say geared towards, I mean that they are the "target audience", which is true as well. Obviously debatable, but true nonetheless. Think about it if you had to answer 1.) who are golf club commercials targeting? 2.) Who are minivan commercials targeting? If you answered honestly you would answer: white men to the first and white women to the second. By no means does that mean only white men play golf, and only white women drive mini vans, it just means that that's who they make the majority of their money from, so that's their "target audience". That's all that i'm trying to explain. And also, i'm sorry what does I need to get out of NT mean? I didn't follow that.Originally Posted by icebergslm
Originally Posted by RFX45
^^^ I think we did agree with your point but you did somewhat generalize by simply saying; "Honestly all this high end fashion is geared towards rich housewives and gay men. Just look at how the majority of the men's clothes fit, and the men who model them. The other thing is 90% of the male designers are gay..."
You emphasize that and boldly said their clothes are for gay men.
As for the clothes you described, you need to get out of NT because there are plenty of people clamoring for short shorts and skin tight v neck sweaters. Visit Style Forum at times, those looks are considered as a good and daring and confident.
There is no common sense, you don't need to wear clothes designed by straight men. Hell that would limit our fashion horizon to Ecko, Sean John, LRG, etc... even some designers from those brands are probably gay too, they just have a different style. I don't think designers designs their clothes and say, "this is perfect for this dude I want to date."
icebergslm wrote:
It's common sense look who's designing the clothing, and who they're designing it for and be honest with yourself.
Again, generalizing who the clothes are made for just because it is made by a certain group.
Common sense has nothing to do with it, you can't judge how these clothes look in the runway and who designed them.
Runway models has always looked that way for decades now and I don't see it going away.
Honestly, Gucci and LV has been designing clothes for the supposedly Urban Scene for a while now and they have boldly advertised it too.
(I'm not sure why the texts are bold after the qoute)
Originally Posted by RFX45
If you think that my point is that we need to wear clothes designed by straight men, then you really are missing my point. And no that was not a generalization. I said that 90% of high end male fashion designers are gay which is exaggerated, but true. I said that these designer design clothes geared mostly towards rich housewives and gay men which is also true. When I say geared towards, I mean that they are the "target audience", which is true as well. Obviously debatable, but true nonetheless. Think about it if you had to answer 1.) who are golf club commercials targeting? 2.) Who are minivan commercials targeting? If you answered honestly you would answer: white men to the first and white women to the second. By no means does that mean only white men play golf, and only white women drive mini vans, it just means that that's who they make the majority of their money from, so that's their "target audience". That's all that i'm trying to explain. And also, i'm sorry what does I need to get out of NT mean? I didn't follow that.Originally Posted by icebergslm
Originally Posted by RFX45
^^^ I think we did agree with your point but you did somewhat generalize by simply saying; "Honestly all this high end fashion is geared towards rich housewives and gay men. Just look at how the majority of the men's clothes fit, and the men who model them. The other thing is 90% of the male designers are gay..."
You emphasize that and boldly said their clothes are for gay men.
As for the clothes you described, you need to get out of NT because there are plenty of people clamoring for short shorts and skin tight v neck sweaters. Visit Style Forum at times, those looks are considered as a good and daring and confident.
There is no common sense, you don't need to wear clothes designed by straight men. Hell that would limit our fashion horizon to Ecko, Sean John, LRG, etc... even some designers from those brands are probably gay too, they just have a different style. I don't think designers designs their clothes and say, "this is perfect for this dude I want to date."
icebergslm wrote:
It's common sense look who's designing the clothing, and who they're designing it for and be honest with yourself.
Again, generalizing who the clothes are made for just because it is made by a certain group.
Common sense has nothing to do with it, you can't judge how these clothes look in the runway and who designed them.
Runway models has always looked that way for decades now and I don't see it going away.
Honestly, Gucci and LV has been designing clothes for the supposedly Urban Scene for a while now and they have boldly advertised it too.
(I'm not sure why the texts are bold after the qoute)