- 33,428
- 12,558
It is exactly the same though... And he'll argue they only used the logo because it's an iconic picture and pose. Nike doesn't really have an argument. They've contracted with him in the past for permission to use it. They can't say now they never copied his work.
i think nike will win simply because the logo was definitely inspired by the pic but its not EXACTLY the same so...
If what he's saying is that they had a prior contract for a term of two years, and Nike has exceeded that by 25 years, what are they going to say? "So?"
Last edited: