Porsche Cayman/Boxster - 718 Returns

Nothing wrong with a C230 benz.

It delivers decent power, while getting decent miles per gallon. Not everyone wants a C63 draining their wallets on fuel. The C230 provides great luxury, safe ride, smooth ride, with better mileage than it's big brother engines.

The 128 BMW is sensational. The power to weight, makes it a really fun drive. I would know, because my lady has a 120i and that already moves for it's size, the 128, with extra power is even better.

It seems you're too concerned with the numbers on the back, instead of the driving experience.

There's a reason why car companies make different engine sizes etc.
lol
What driving experience? Stop and go city traffic? 65 mph down the highway in a straight line?
You do realize that "driving experience" is a marketing ploy. That's all it is.
What percentage of thbe popualtion tracks their cars? What percentage utilitze even 75% of their cars potential ? This goes for all types of cars.

Carmakers crank out engines for everyday sedans in the realm of 200+ horsepower not because cars need it. It's because it sells cars.

Your girl needs the 200+ horses in the 128i like I need a Hayabusa.

People can buy whatever they want but pretending like "driving experience" or horsepower matter is irrational.
It's the name and social status.

My aunt recently purchased a BMW X3 even though she was also looking at a RAV4 w/ the 3.5L engine. She went with the X3 because of status. Dollar for the dollar the RAV4 blows the x3 out and that holds true for many non luxury v luxury brands, car v car comparisons. You're paying for the name.

Do you have a car? Have you had multiple cars? I can tell you since I'm about to transition to my 4th car. Driving experience is more than the track. It's more than just putting your foot down. The reality is, I'm stuck in traffic sometimes, the level of comfort is important to me. It's just as important as the comfort when driving down the highway at 120km/h. Safety is important, as I've totalled a car before and luckily walked out with 1 small scratch on me. The luxury features that one has in their car is all part of the driving experience. You do realise that "Driving Experience" does mean, the actual feeling you experience while driving the car right? It's not necessarily the feeling of how the car performs on the track. In fact every car I've ever had, is not a track vehicle. I don't even know why the track was even brought up.

More so, the chasis and handling is very important to me. I live in a city with lots of mountain roads, which means twists and turns every time I go to the beach, certain neighbourhoods or restaurants. I'm not saying the car needs to be drift ready, but it needs to be able to handle the corners comfortably and smoothly. This is all part of the driving experience. Best believe, that a 320d BMW/Lexus IS250/Benz C230 will handle those curves better than many Toyotas.

Horsepower does matter, it's just not the be all and end all to buying a car. Currently I've looked at the Lexus IS, The IS250 is a great engine, but for me the extra ponies in a IS350 doesn't make sense on my gas bill. With your logic it has to be the IS350F. Which is not what I need. I don't need those extra ponies. The 250 provides all of the luxury, comfort, security and ENOUGH horsepower for me to be happy.

Just because your aunt bought an X3 just for the name, doesn't mean all of us buy our cars for the name. Some of us buy our cars because it fits all of the aspects we look for in a car.
I Why cant people keep it funky anymore? Most (not you or some others) people aren't caring about all this stuff you mentioned so if you are different cool but I don't see why people don't think most people get luxury cars for the status, looks, other non driving things. I don't know who said but its true most people don't even use the technology in the cars its just a fancy a to b car which I have no problem with it. All that stuff you mentioned dudes aren't doing all that jive gobble gobble turkey gobble they just getting the car that looks the best to them they can afford.
 
Cayenne and Boxster are the poser porsches....starter kit, entry level (source: evoque thread)

You like the Boxster but don't like the Cayman? Cayman is like 4k more and better looking
 
This guy.

Apparently anything thats not the top of the line model is the poser version and apparently also leased.
laugh.gif


How old are you? I hope you arent older than 17, cause youre trolling is ridiculous. Youre like an itch, annoying and you just want it to go away.
 
Do you have a car? Have you had multiple cars? I can tell you since I'm about to transition to my 4th car. Driving experience is more than the track. It's more than just putting your foot down. The reality is, I'm stuck in traffic sometimes, the level of comfort is important to me. It's just as important as the comfort when driving down the highway at 120km/h. Safety is important, as I've totalled a car before and luckily walked out with 1 small scratch on me. The luxury features that one has in their car is all part of the driving experience. You do realise that "Driving Experience" does mean, the actual feeling you experience while driving the car right? It's not necessarily the feeling of how the car performs on the track. In fact every car I've ever had, is not a track vehicle. I don't even know why the track was even brought up.
More so, the chasis and handling is very important to me. I live in a city with lots of mountain roads, which means twists and turns every time I go to the beach, certain neighbourhoods or restaurants. I'm not saying the car needs to be drift ready, but it needs to be able to handle the corners comfortably and smoothly. This is all part of the driving experience. Best believe, that a 320d BMW/Lexus IS250/Benz C230 will handle those curves better than many Toyotas.
Horsepower does matter, it's just not the be all and end all to buying a car. Currently I've looked at the Lexus IS, The IS250 is a great engine, but for me the extra ponies in a IS350 doesn't make sense on my gas bill. With your logic it has to be the IS350F. Which is not what I need. I don't need those extra ponies. The 250 provides all of the luxury, comfort, security and ENOUGH horsepower for me to be happy.
Just because your aunt bought an X3 just for the name, doesn't mean all of us buy our cars for the name. Some of us buy our cars because it fits all of the aspects we look for in a car.
That's BS and you and I know it.

If you're going to claim that luxury brands are safer than non luxury brands, then I'll laugh in your face.

If you're going to claim that entry level luxury vehicles have better interiors than loaded non luxury vehicles (at a cheaper price), I'll laugh in your face.

If you're going to claim that you're so in tune as a car driver that how a car handles corners at  relatively low speeds ( read: non nascar speeds) actually matters then I'll laugh in your face. That is unless you claim and prove that you were a professional race car driver at some point.

There are substantial differences relegatedto certain models but they're limited to many fewer models among the luxury brands than common belief dictates.
 
Last edited:
when you compare it to other cars in its class in regards to performance, its definitely da poser porsche.

let's put it like this, porsche didn't win da pedigree of having some of da best driving cars in da world producing things like

da cayman or da panamera, or da cayane, they did it on da strength of da 911. now i aint gonna say if you ain't copping a 911 there's

no point in having a Porsche, (thats for da HARDCORE Porsche fans) but to say da boxter wasn't just a "broadening of da customer base"

model then its being SLIGHTLY delusional...however porsche i dont see nothing wrong with having these offerings to compete with other

makers who are doing da same thing.
It's about bringing in more revenue in already saturated markets.

A dude or gal who has a 911, isn't going to purchasing more 911's and the supply of wealthy people is limited.

You're spot on with your assesment.
 
^

But he didnt claim any of that in his post? (Wawawowee or whatever)

He just said what he needs in a car and none extra. Theres no reason to go for the V6 version of the Accord if youre fine with the i4. No reason to get an M3 if youre fine and can only comfortably afford the 335i.
 
Last edited:
Do you have a car? Have you had multiple cars? I can tell you since I'm about to transition to my 4th car. Driving experience is more than the track. It's more than just putting your foot down. The reality is, I'm stuck in traffic sometimes, the level of comfort is important to me. It's just as important as the comfort when driving down the highway at 120km/h. Safety is important, as I've totalled a car before and luckily walked out with 1 small scratch on me. The luxury features that one has in their car is all part of the driving experience. You do realise that "Driving Experience" does mean, the actual feeling you experience while driving the car right? It's not necessarily the feeling of how the car performs on the track. In fact every car I've ever had, is not a track vehicle. I don't even know why the track was even brought up.

More so, the chasis and handling is very important to me. I live in a city with lots of mountain roads, which means twists and turns every time I go to the beach, certain neighbourhoods or restaurants. I'm not saying the car needs to be drift ready, but it needs to be able to handle the corners comfortably and smoothly. This is all part of the driving experience. Best believe, that a 320d BMW/Lexus IS250/Benz C230 will handle those curves better than many Toyotas.

Horsepower does matter, it's just not the be all and end all to buying a car. Currently I've looked at the Lexus IS, The IS250 is a great engine, but for me the extra ponies in a IS350 doesn't make sense on my gas bill. With your logic it has to be the IS350F. Which is not what I need. I don't need those extra ponies. The 250 provides all of the luxury, comfort, security and ENOUGH horsepower for me to be happy.

Just because your aunt bought an X3 just for the name, doesn't mean all of us buy our cars for the name. Some of us buy our cars because it fits all of the aspects we look for in a car.

That's BS and you and I know it.

If you're going to claim that luxury brands are safer than non luxury brands, then I'll laugh in your face.

If you're going to claim that entry level luxury vehicles have better interiors than loaded non luxury vehicles (at a cheaper price), I'll laugh in your face.

If you're going to claim that you're so in tune as a car driver that how a car handles corners at  relatively low speeds ( read: non nascar speeds) actually matters then I'll laugh in your face. That is unless you claim and prove that you were a professional race car driver at some point.

There are substantial differences relegatedto certain models but they're limited to many fewer models among the luxury brands than common belief dictates.

If dude was saying higher end luxury brands have these things that non-luxury brands don't do, I'd agree. However, to say that the entry level luxury models are better than non-luxury vehicles is just complete hogwash.

At least on the mid-higher end luxury models, you are actually getting something that another automaker does not have or features that other cars don't have. For the lower end models, you are just paying extra to have that Benz or BMW emblem on non-luxury quality internals.
 
The poser Porsche? Its probably the best drivers car you can buy, def. better than a 911 because of the balance. :{ But, I only speak from experience :p .
 
^

But he didnt claim any of that in his post? (Wawawowee or whatever)


He just said what he needs in a car and none extra. Theres no reason to go for the V6 version of the Accord if youre fine with the i4. No reason to get an M3 if youre fine and can only comfortably afford the 335i.

Exactly.
 
Part of what's wrong with America is people reaching out of their comfort zones to buy depreciating assets. A car is the perfect example of one. Should commend those who recognize the importance of balanced finances and they follow through on that with their purchases. Calling someone else's vehicle a poser is the same mentality that usually leads to insurmountable debts and miserable financial conditions. I'm not even mad at people who first buy what they want while continuing to stack for the important stuff.....but can also afford a $60,000 car.
 
Part of what's wrong with America is people reaching out of their comfort zones to buy depreciating assets. A car is the perfect example of one. Should commend those who recognize the importance of balanced finances and they follow through on that with their purchases. Calling someone else's vehicle a poser is the same mentality that usually leads to insurmountable debts and miserable financial conditions. I'm not even mad at people who first buy what they want while continuing to stack for the important stuff.....but can also afford a $60,000 car.

well said.

As for the car being a poser, well it really depends. Personally I think Porsche's are ugly, that's why I don't like them, in addition I think that the SLK or the Z4 series' both look better. And are pretty much in the same range, at least the one's equipped with a larger engine. And a 370 Z is in the same category too, no?
SO there are plenty of alternatives I think look better and buying one to just have a Porsche isn't cool.
 
this dude i know just graduated school and copped this (2012 model tho)
this thing is alarming when it turns on and a beast when you step on the throttle.
 
yea you guys are using car lingo all wrong, theres no way a Cayman is a poser Porsche, it would be a poser car if he started smacking GT2 RS stickers and emblems on it, that's what poser means
 
and thats really da bottom line.

so many car makers, it hurts seeing people thirsting at da feet of benz and bimmer, and willing to drive da SUPER bottom totempole offerings

just to tell people "yea i push a benz, bimmer" smh.

thats how people are though. brand name/image matters to consumers. why do people cop nikes? they can just wear any shoes that serve the same purpose. or louis v belt? gucci wallets? its all da same...
 
EXACTLY! so much irony...this isn't to say it is the only thing people care about (brand & status that is) when it comes to what product to buy, but don't front as if it doesn't matter; were this a base model ford/honda/hyundai/toyota would people still like it as much? be willing to drop 50k on it??
 
Poser Porsche and Baby Rovers...

Next someone's going to post a Lambo Gallardo or Ferrari California pickup, and members are going to be saying they're baby Lambo's and Ferrari jr's.  
mean.gif


A Porsche is still a Porsche.  People acting like they have Veyrons and Aventadors in their garage.
 
Back
Top Bottom