Please lock this one up mods
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by stillin729,
- Start date
- 151,164
- 202,581
we trade for 1:
http://grantland.com/the-triangle/the-nfl-mock-trade-draft-part-1/
also, barnwell really doesn't do his homework with the eagles stuff (he was wrong previously when writing about the money for the RBs).. he has the rams trading a 2nd they receive from the eagles
but he has us trading Bradford to trade up to 1
we only trade a 2nd to the rams IF Bradford starts for us next season (cant remember if he has to start a certain number of games or not)
http://grantland.com/the-triangle/the-nfl-mock-trade-draft-part-1/
also, barnwell really doesn't do his homework with the eagles stuff (he was wrong previously when writing about the money for the RBs).. he has the rams trading a 2nd they receive from the eagles
but he has us trading Bradford to trade up to 1
we only trade a 2nd to the rams IF Bradford starts for us next season (cant remember if he has to start a certain number of games or not)
Last edited:
- 151,164
- 202,581
also.. just realized this dude barnwell has me blocked on twitter.. no clue for what
- 68,176
- 24,538
Watkins might be a solid safety
All indications is they don't like Collins, B Dawk basically said he won't be good here also
All indications is they don't like Collins, B Dawk basically said he won't be good here also
- 151,164
- 202,581
^ yea.. Collins would be better suited as a lb for what we do..
The safeties we looked at, were former CBs.. So that show the emphasis we put on coverage abilities
The safeties we looked at, were former CBs.. So that show the emphasis we put on coverage abilities
- 4,153
- 313
Apparently we were about to trade for dion jordan, thank god 
- 151,164
- 202,581
not THAT bad.. we were supposedly going give up a conditional late round pickApparently we were about to trade for dion jordan, thank god
- 151,164
- 202,581
this is one barnwell suggestion I might be able to get behind:
[h2]20. Philadelphia Eagles[/h2]
Eagles send: 2015-1-20, 2015-2-52, Sam Bradford
Washington sends: 2015-1-5, Robert Griffin
This trade will never, ever, ever happen for about 18 million reasons, but it does make a tiny bit of sense. Chip Kelly loves a project with upside, and Robert Griffin clearly qualifies there. RG3 would be a much better fit for Kelly’s system than Sam Bradford, owing to the success Griffin had as a zone-read quarterback at Baylor and during his debut season with Washington. While the pre-2015 arguments were that Griffin needed to become a more conventional quarterback, that logic clearly didn’t take. The Eagles have bought low on players with injury issues in the hopes that Kelly’s emphasis on sports science will help them to stay healthier, and Griffin could hardly be more injured.
Bradford, himself an injury risk, would fit far more comfortably into Jay Gruden’s West Coast offense than the downfield attack espoused by Kelly. And the picks work in each team’s favor. Washington trades down and acquires an extra second-rounder in the process while moving on from what’s become an organizational nightmare, while the Eagles move up to no. 5, where they could likely draft 6-foot-3 West Virginia wideout Kevin White to fill out their suddenly lackluster receiving corps. This would be crazy, and for sports radio reasons alone, it should never happen. But it’s not as crazy as it first sounds.
http://grantland.com/the-triangle/the-nfl-mock-trade-draft-part-2/
[h2]20. Philadelphia Eagles[/h2]
Eagles send: 2015-1-20, 2015-2-52, Sam Bradford
Washington sends: 2015-1-5, Robert Griffin
This trade will never, ever, ever happen for about 18 million reasons, but it does make a tiny bit of sense. Chip Kelly loves a project with upside, and Robert Griffin clearly qualifies there. RG3 would be a much better fit for Kelly’s system than Sam Bradford, owing to the success Griffin had as a zone-read quarterback at Baylor and during his debut season with Washington. While the pre-2015 arguments were that Griffin needed to become a more conventional quarterback, that logic clearly didn’t take. The Eagles have bought low on players with injury issues in the hopes that Kelly’s emphasis on sports science will help them to stay healthier, and Griffin could hardly be more injured.
Bradford, himself an injury risk, would fit far more comfortably into Jay Gruden’s West Coast offense than the downfield attack espoused by Kelly. And the picks work in each team’s favor. Washington trades down and acquires an extra second-rounder in the process while moving on from what’s become an organizational nightmare, while the Eagles move up to no. 5, where they could likely draft 6-foot-3 West Virginia wideout Kevin White to fill out their suddenly lackluster receiving corps. This would be crazy, and for sports radio reasons alone, it should never happen. But it’s not as crazy as it first sounds.
http://grantland.com/the-triangle/the-nfl-mock-trade-draft-part-2/
- 32,351
- 34,857
I'm cool with that. And if Mariota falls past 2, we can scoop him at 5 lol
- 151,164
- 202,581
If we cant move up for mm8.. I'd happily move down and try and get jones and agholor somehow..
Maybe move down slightly and pick up an extra pick we can package with our 2nd
Maybe move down slightly and pick up an extra pick we can package with our 2nd
Last edited:
District of Columbia
formerly dcmade
- 8,311
- 3,977
I've seen RG3 firsthand down here ..dude is a train wreck I don't want to see him anywhere near here I don't buy that change of scenery BS
And at this point I don't want Mariota tbh ..If it means future picks and a guy like Cox then extra hell no. I thick chip is arrogant enough to think he can turn Bradford around I'm excited to see it
Yall talk of giving up Cox is disturbing ..dude is the best interior linemen in the conference. And I'm honestly think we have to think of wat happens if Chip leaves ..I'm not willing to give up the house for Mariota then in 2 years he's gone ..he's strikes me as the type to bolt of we get another couple of years of 10-6 with no playoff sucess
And at this point I don't want Mariota tbh ..If it means future picks and a guy like Cox then extra hell no. I thick chip is arrogant enough to think he can turn Bradford around I'm excited to see it
Yall talk of giving up Cox is disturbing ..dude is the best interior linemen in the conference. And I'm honestly think we have to think of wat happens if Chip leaves ..I'm not willing to give up the house for Mariota then in 2 years he's gone ..he's strikes me as the type to bolt of we get another couple of years of 10-6 with no playoff sucess
Bruce Banner
formerly jetsetkev
- 6,341
- 3,187
Kendricks is an amazing player won't we be a different team if we trade him? Defense was clearly better with him. Cox and Kendricks are cornerstones of this defense. I'll be upset if they trade either of them even if it is for Mariota who I want us to get but not to this extinct .
Last edited:
Bruce Banner
formerly jetsetkev
- 6,341
- 3,187
dudes have been on this thread talking mad crazy with their trade scenarios .
- 68,176
- 24,538
If we can't get MM8, I'm rolling with Bradford and hopefully Hundley
District of Columbia
formerly dcmade
- 8,311
- 3,977
I hope they resigned Demeco as insurance policy for if Kiko or Kendricks go down ..please don't trade Kendricks
Bruce Banner
formerly jetsetkev
- 6,341
- 3,187
was watching him throw earlier Hundley is pretty good kinda remind me of Kaepernick idk if thats a good or bad thing .
- 68,176
- 24,538
Hundley is smarter which is def a good thing
District of Columbia
formerly dcmade
- 8,311
- 3,977
If we don't pick up MM8 Then I don't think we take Hundley ..did we pay Sanchez 9 mil to be 3rd string
Last edited:
District of Columbia
formerly dcmade
- 8,311
- 3,977
Can we talk about how much of bust Marcus Smith is already ..all of a sudden we have an influx of LBs ..dude might not be on the team come 2016 if he don't show up this year
Shades of Danny Watkins
Shades of Danny Watkins
Last edited:
- 68,176
- 24,538
Hundley in the 2nd to be your future QB
they are shopping Smith which tells me that pick was 100% on Howie
- 4,153
- 313
When we couldve traded up 1 spot for Haha 
- 68,176
- 24,538
When we couldve traded up 1 spot for Haha
when Verrett went off the board they scrambled
should have taken Deone Bucannon
Bruce Banner
formerly jetsetkev
- 6,341
- 3,187
When we couldve traded up 1 spot for Haha
Don't even bring this up smh every year we've had a chance to have an amazing backfield
- 151,164
- 202,581
Sanchez's contract is incentive based.. On playing time and all that jazz
And folks need to remember, we probably had the greatest defense ever with those Jerome brown/Reggie white teams.. And we should all know where that got us
I'm in the camp of calling the Titans and couple team's bluff.. My ideal world, Bradford 20 and maybe a 3rd (with browns helping us out.. Maybe we take whatever guaranteed money manziel has on his deal off their hands)
I'm perfectly happy trying to build up the rest of the team.. And seeing if we can get hundley in the 2nd, since I think mora is a terrible coach so would love to see him develop with us
But I just have little faith Bradford can stay healthy
And folks need to remember, we probably had the greatest defense ever with those Jerome brown/Reggie white teams.. And we should all know where that got us
I'm in the camp of calling the Titans and couple team's bluff.. My ideal world, Bradford 20 and maybe a 3rd (with browns helping us out.. Maybe we take whatever guaranteed money manziel has on his deal off their hands)
I'm perfectly happy trying to build up the rest of the team.. And seeing if we can get hundley in the 2nd, since I think mora is a terrible coach so would love to see him develop with us
But I just have little faith Bradford can stay healthy
Last edited:
