ssgefiestoakagerger
Banned
- 755
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2007
Pic Request: MJ in Blue XIs
- Thread in 'Sneaker Showcase' Thread starter Started by p0tat0 5alad,
- Start date
- 4,718
- 15
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2007
like I said
emac291
Banned
- 128
- 11
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2007
DDDDDAAAAAMMMMMNNNN those r FRESH!!
I love the wizards colors the white/blue/gold i wish they made that color way for every J n released them.
I love the wizards colors the white/blue/gold i wish they made that color way for every J n released them.
- 3
- 10
- Joined
- May 10, 2005
????????? From Google......
- 3,311
- 53
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2007
OMG OMG OMG
Those are them!
This was debated for like 5 months in the Jordan forum.
Theyre not blue.
Those are them!
This was debated for like 5 months in the Jordan forum.
Theyre not blue.
- 2,212
- 61
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2006
I hope you're kidding.
If not, please log off.
- 195
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2007
Originally Posted by ssgefiestoakagerger
these are not blue....it is a reflection....lol
- 1,061
- 18
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2005
According to who? Did i miss when MJ logged on and told us?
- 3,311
- 53
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2007
the hater boxden
Banned
- 8,340
- 1,382
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2007
if they are really concords then they would appear to be blue all around...also black patent leather wont reflect a color that vividly
- 1,503
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
Here's another picture to help clarify the issue.....
- 199
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2006
Yeah. no way the reflection can be that perfect.
- 199
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2006
- 1,075
- 207
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2002
I can't believe this topic is posted again and again. They are concords. I'm sorry to all you believers that they are blue, but they're not. Thistopic was and has been debated over and over again for years. I mean YEARS . Every Jordan know-it-all and Nike insider confirmed they areconcords. Mclilbit's (I think those are his from shoe center) were look see samples.
- 4,271
- 267
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2005
still hard to believe those are concords
ballab87
Banned
- 115
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
yes they are blue as can be no parts of them is blackOriginally Posted by jhunterTwOThReE
- 187
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2003
- 141
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2000
When I first saw this picture, I was like
"MJ got on somewhite/blue xi's," but now I'm not so sure. I had seen MClilbit's sample pictures, but I didn't really think they looked like the color ofthe shoes MJ has on.
Now I'm not siding either way on this "debate," but there are a few ridiculous arguments being made. You can't seriously think that animperfectly black piece of leather can reflect the blue from his pants. If the shoes are in fact concords, the reflection would be from the floor or fromlights that you cannot see in this picture. And they are not a reflection of a blue color...it would just be a regular old shine like most clean pairs ofconcords pick up. But that shine combined with the black could give the illusion of an overall blue color. Take that shine out and you get something likethis:
Of course you have barely anything to look at, but it was a crappy picture to begin with
Like I said, I'm not taking either side. This picture is just too small. I just wanted to throw out another perspective
Now I'm not siding either way on this "debate," but there are a few ridiculous arguments being made. You can't seriously think that animperfectly black piece of leather can reflect the blue from his pants. If the shoes are in fact concords, the reflection would be from the floor or fromlights that you cannot see in this picture. And they are not a reflection of a blue color...it would just be a regular old shine like most clean pairs ofconcords pick up. But that shine combined with the black could give the illusion of an overall blue color. Take that shine out and you get something likethis:
Of course you have barely anything to look at, but it was a crappy picture to begin with
Like I said, I'm not taking either side. This picture is just too small. I just wanted to throw out another perspective
