- Sep 1, 2006
- 17,626
- 456
Me too.
Pearl White Foamposite Pro Fall 2010
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by 23mcpizzle23,
- Start date
- Nov 11, 2007
- 7,332
- 11
how do these joints run.. small?
- Sep 2, 2009
- 2,786
- 53
True to size...I'm glad stock hasn't run out yet.
- Nov 20, 2010
- 449
- 10
Want to cop, but def dont want to pay retail...
abstrakt
Banned
- Oct 15, 2008
- 1,353
- 12
Maybe you should try reading anything prior to your post.
- Apr 1, 2009
- 1,026
- 14
^^ dudes just posting anything for post count pay them no mind.
- Apr 3, 2008
- 6,367
- 40
i still think im going with my comment before these dropped, HOH Pearls >> 2010 pearls but 2010s are a nice addition to the collection
- Jun 1, 2007
- 9,714
- 3,630
Can anyone keep a lookout for a sz 7.5?!? If y'all find it PM me?
Thx bros!
Thx bros!
bigj505
Staff member
- Jan 23, 2007
- 42,582
- 21,771
try to stock locate them at footlocker/footaction and see if you can use the $30 off VIP coupon.
- Oct 8, 2005
- 9,953
- 7,147
wish i could get the eggplants for that low lol. i thought these would fly off shelves and never be seen except on ebay.
sour diesel
Banned
- Jul 3, 2010
- 570
- 10
Originally Posted by UPandCOMING32
i still think im going with my comment before these dropped, HOH Pearls >> 2010 pearls but 2010s are a nice addition to the collection
Am I missing something? Arent they identical?
- Apr 3, 2008
- 6,367
- 40
^ no. and yes you are missing something, the soles.
clear > blue on this colorway
clear > blue on this colorway
bigj505
Staff member
- Jan 23, 2007
- 42,582
- 21,771
Originally Posted by Sour Diesel
Originally Posted by UPandCOMING32
i still think im going with my comment before these dropped, HOH Pearls >> 2010 pearls but 2010s are a nice addition to the collection
Am I missing something? Arent they identical?
- Sep 2, 2009
- 2,786
- 53
well that takes care of that ^
- Nov 2, 2007
- 8,776
- 5,180
Best bet is to look on ebay, you aint finding that size for retail.
- May 24, 2008
- 4,164
- 1,070
I actually like all 3 for diffrent reasons.... All nice IMO !
sour diesel
Banned
- Jul 3, 2010
- 570
- 10
Thanks for the pic. So it looks like besides the tint of the sole and maybe the angle of the carbon fiber, the HOHs and 2010s are the same? I have the 2010s, but I am digging how that HOH sole looks a bit more similar to the OG. Don't mind the 2010s at all though, my soles aren't looking so blue anymore and I've always loved that champagne/cream tint since I first saw the HOH's. Just so unique and lovely
Oh, and I guess the HOHs are probably the nicer Taiwan made molds right? That's a pretty big difference, not so much aesthetically, but just overall. So yeah, I'll probably agree that HOHs > 2010s
Oh, and I guess the HOHs are probably the nicer Taiwan made molds right? That's a pretty big difference, not so much aesthetically, but just overall. So yeah, I'll probably agree that HOHs > 2010s
bigj505
Staff member
- Jan 23, 2007
- 42,582
- 21,771
Sour Diesel - u pretty much got everything right.
- Sep 18, 2006
- 967
- 12
Love DEXTER! hahaha...that animaged Gif is money! hahahaaa
- Jan 4, 2010
- 1,867
- 11
Yep, pretty much any Nike shoe made by Taiwan is going to be superior than China counterparts.
I do like the HOH pearls a lot, hopefully i will get a cop a pair in the future. They arent as limited as the HOH Army or HOH Royal, so i assume i can pick up a pair for cheaper.............or so i hope.
baby jumpman
Staff member
- Dec 25, 2006
- 5,377
- 495
^Nah not necessarily, any HOH pair rarely pops up for sale and when they do the price is usually high since they know what they're selling is limited.
Not to nitpick but it seems like everyone calls the armys a HOH release. I'm almost positive some boutiques got them when they released, I could be wrong but I remember hearing that.
Not to nitpick but it seems like everyone calls the armys a HOH release. I'm almost positive some boutiques got them when they released, I could be wrong but I remember hearing that.
- Mar 6, 2006
- 143
- 10
Me too I could have sworn I heard that some boutiques got them
- Jan 4, 2010
- 1,867
- 11
so much different information going on, its hard to distinguish between whats right and what isnt. I have also heard army was about as limited as HOH royals, but i am guessing that is false, since HOH royal was only dropped in NY? God i am just hoping i dont have to drop the same amount of money i did for a pair of army or royal....but i am a sucker for foam, so thats a problem.
baby jumpman
Staff member
- Dec 25, 2006
- 5,377
- 495
^Yea I mean I could be wrong but that's what I heard and read, just people always call them a HOH release. Not that big of a deal just something that I always see.
The Royals were definitely a HOH only release, everyone always throws out numbers around 84 for the royals and armies for some reason. I know in my size I haven't seen the pearls or royals go for nothing less then low $400. Except for the pair J grabbed
Hell even the armies for that matter go for that much, I've given up on even getting another pair to keep DS.
The Royals were definitely a HOH only release, everyone always throws out numbers around 84 for the royals and armies for some reason. I know in my size I haven't seen the pearls or royals go for nothing less then low $400. Except for the pair J grabbed
- Oct 6, 2009
- 7,072
- 11
you right a few boutiques did get the army's...so there's no way they were as limited as hoh royals...tho there were probably more hoh pearls produced than army's, you never see hoh pearls pop up on the bay unless its a huge size and they go for a hefty price tag regardless
