- 12,102
- 1,410
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
he (and the Cavs ) can do whatever they want on the floor this year, if the voters share the same views as most people have had towards him the past 7 or 8 months they will not give it to him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
I'm saying LeBron has unlimited range on his 3- ball, and has a ratchet. People use the fact that he'll put up an airball occasionally to mean he doesn't have a J. You have to be a deranged Laker fan to think Gasol has a better jumperOriginally Posted by Ace Rawstein
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
The LeBron doesn't have a jumper is honestly not just uninformed, its borderline ******ed.Originally Posted by Ace Rawstein
Pau Gasol gotta better jump shothow about your reading comprehension tho
I fell just short of saying he doesnt have a jumper...or are u saying Gasol doesnt have a J
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
I'm saying LeBron has unlimited range on his 3- ball, and has a ratchet. People use the fact that he'll put up an airball occasionally to mean he doesn't have a J. You have to be a deranged Laker fan to think Gasol has a better jumperOriginally Posted by Ace Rawstein
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
The LeBron doesn't have a jumper is honestly not just uninformed, its borderline ******ed.Originally Posted by Ace Rawstein
Pau Gasol gotta better jump shothow about your reading comprehension tho
I fell just short of saying he doesnt have a jumper...or are u saying Gasol doesnt have a J
Originally Posted by eNPHAN
why yall say he DEFINITELY isnt going to win?
Originally Posted by eNPHAN
why yall say he DEFINITELY isnt going to win?
Okay, can we FINALLY admit..... Lebron is the best player in the world?
It's been that way for like 3-4 years now.
Okay, can we FINALLY admit..... Lebron is the best player in the world?
It's been that way for like 3-4 years now.
Originally Posted by diew its james
in the cavs defense they don't have shaq this year, mo and anderson have been out frequently, and new coaching system. but still...24 straight losses is unacceptable
Some People actually HATE this guy now. And if they don't hate him, they at the least think he took the easy way out.
Id be almost certain that some voters are looking for any reason this year to give it to Rose or Durant.
while i understand this, ultimately, you're not going to be able to ignore the statistical edge + the cavs record without James...
i'd give it to rose, after james, tho...
even though, again, the MVP is supposed to signify the most valuable player to his respective team...
without rose the bulls wouldnt be GREAT, but they wouldnt be THE WORST EVER
without Durant, the thunder wouldnt be GREAT, but they wouldnt be THE WORST EVER
the cavs are literally THE WORST EVER
their star player is JJ Hixon....
he sat the bench last year's playoffs....
their head coach is their best player...
this is the exact reason bron left cleveland in the first place...
its a franchise of bums, from ownership to towel boys....
he's tired of people saying "so and so" is better because they played with other all-stars and had beasty teams...
every year the best TEAM wins a ring, so why are we using the ring in an argument of INDIVIDUAL DOMINANCE?
i mean, i understand what's being said, but there comes a point in which the bitterness and saltiness will be overrun with the facts...
you already hear it from annoucers that were all "hes going to dwade's team, hes a sidekick, blah blah"
now they're "its obviously his team...."
etc.
yall are seriously suggesting that derrick rose is the MVP over lebron james?
Originally Posted by diew its james
in the cavs defense they don't have shaq this year, mo and anderson have been out frequently, and new coaching system. but still...24 straight losses is unacceptable
Some People actually HATE this guy now. And if they don't hate him, they at the least think he took the easy way out.
Id be almost certain that some voters are looking for any reason this year to give it to Rose or Durant.
while i understand this, ultimately, you're not going to be able to ignore the statistical edge + the cavs record without James...
i'd give it to rose, after james, tho...
even though, again, the MVP is supposed to signify the most valuable player to his respective team...
without rose the bulls wouldnt be GREAT, but they wouldnt be THE WORST EVER
without Durant, the thunder wouldnt be GREAT, but they wouldnt be THE WORST EVER
the cavs are literally THE WORST EVER
their star player is JJ Hixon....
he sat the bench last year's playoffs....
their head coach is their best player...
this is the exact reason bron left cleveland in the first place...
its a franchise of bums, from ownership to towel boys....
he's tired of people saying "so and so" is better because they played with other all-stars and had beasty teams...
every year the best TEAM wins a ring, so why are we using the ring in an argument of INDIVIDUAL DOMINANCE?
i mean, i understand what's being said, but there comes a point in which the bitterness and saltiness will be overrun with the facts...
you already hear it from annoucers that were all "hes going to dwade's team, hes a sidekick, blah blah"
now they're "its obviously his team...."
etc.
yall are seriously suggesting that derrick rose is the MVP over lebron james?